From Criminal Law Notebook
|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{HeaderProcedure}} |
| | |
| ==Section 24(1) of the Charter== | | ==Section 24(1) of the Charter== |
| {{seealso|Stay of Proceedings}} | | {{seealso|Stay of Proceedings}} |
Revision as of 18:42, 3 July 2020
Section 24(1) of the Charter
- See also: Stay of Proceedings
The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.[1]
Where there is an error in principle, relies on irrelevant factors, or is unreasonable, the appellate court may intervene.[2]
- ↑
R. v Simpson, 1995 CanLII 120 (SCC), [1995] 1 SCR 449 rev’g (1994), 1994 CanLII 4528 (NL CA), 117 Nfld & PEIR 110 at paras. 67-9, 88 CCC (3d) 377 (CA)(complete citation pending)
- ↑
R. v Babos, 2014 SCC 16 at paras. 48-9, [2014] 1 SCR 309(complete citation pending)
Section 24(2)
- See also: Discretionary Exclusion of Evidence
See Also
