Charter Remedies: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\)\|, \[([0-9]{4})\] ([0-9]+) SCR" to ")|[$1] $2 SCR" |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.<ref> | The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Simpson|1frmt|1995 CanLII 120 (SCC)| | {{CanLIIRP|Simpson|1frmt|1995 CanLII 120 (SCC)|[1995] 1 SCR 449 rev’g (1994), [http://canlii.ca/t/1nplw 1994 CanLII 4528 (NL CA)], 117 Nfld & PEIR 110}}{{atsL|1nplw|67| to 69}} (CCC)<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Where there is an error in principle, relies on irrelevant factors, or is unreasonable, the appellate court may intervene.<Ref> | Where there is an error in principle, relies on irrelevant factors, or is unreasonable, the appellate court may intervene.<Ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Babos|g36g4|2014 SCC 16 (CanLII)| | {{CanLIIRP|Babos|g36g4|2014 SCC 16 (CanLII)|[2014] 1 SCR 309}}{{perSCC|Moldaver J}}{{atsL|g36g4|48| to 49}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Revision as of 19:47, 22 March 2021
Section 24(1) of the Charter
The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.[1]
Where there is an error in principle, relies on irrelevant factors, or is unreasonable, the appellate court may intervene.[2]
- Unreasonable Detention
Where an officer detains someone for longer than what is permitted under s. 503(1)(a), the remedies include sentence credit at sentencing.[3]
- ↑
R v Simpson, 1995 CanLII 120 (SCC), [1995] 1 SCR 449 rev’g (1994), 1994 CanLII 4528 (NL CA), 117 Nfld & PEIR 110, at paras 67 to 69 (CCC)
- ↑ R v Babos, 2014 SCC 16 (CanLII), [2014] 1 SCR 309, per Moldaver J, at paras 48 to 49
- ↑
R v B(S), 2014 ONCA 527 (CanLII), 121 OR (3d) 145, per Rosenberg JA, at para 13
R v Rashid, 2010 ONCA 591 (CanLII), 259 CCC (3d) 289, per curiam, at paras 6-7