Warrantless Searches: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]*)\'\', \[http\:\/\/canlii\.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) ([1-2][0-9]{3} CanLII [0-9]+)\] (\([A-Z]+\)){" to "{{CanLIIR|$1|$2|$3 $4}}{" |
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\'\, \[http\:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9]+) ([1-2][0-9]+ CanLII [0-9]+)\] \(SCC\)\, (\[[0-9]+\] [0-9]+ SCR [0-9]+)\{" to "{{CanLIIR|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{" |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
''R v Golden'', [2001] 3 SCR 679, [http://canlii.ca/t/51xm 2001 SCC 83] (CanLII){{perSCC| Iacobucci and Arbour JJ}}<br> | ''R v Golden'', [2001] 3 SCR 679, [http://canlii.ca/t/51xm 2001 SCC 83] (CanLII){{perSCC| Iacobucci and Arbour JJ}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIR|Mann|1hmp1|2004 SCC 52 (CanLII)}}{{perSCC| Iacobucci J}}<br> | {{CanLIIR|Mann|1hmp1|2004 SCC 52 (CanLII)}}{{perSCC| Iacobucci J}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIR|Feeney|1fr1w|1997 CanLII 342 (CanLII)}}{{atL|1fr1w|54}}<br> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
The Crown then must prove the reasonableness of the search on a balance of probabilities. <ref> | The Crown then must prove the reasonableness of the search on a balance of probabilities. <ref> | ||
see | see {{CanLIIR|Caslake|1fqww|1998 CanLII 838 (CanLII)}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}{{AtL|1fqww|11}}</ref> | ||
Reasonableness of a search has both a subjective and objective component.<ref> | Reasonableness of a search has both a subjective and objective component.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIR|Bernshaw|1frmf|1995 CanLII 150 (SCC)}}{{perSCC|Sopinka J}}</ref> | {{CanLIIR|Bernshaw|1frmf|1995 CanLII 150 (SCC)}}{{perSCC|Sopinka J}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 09:42, 29 January 2021
Introduction
Police can be authorized to intrude on a person's right to privacy either through statute or by common law power.
Generally speaking, a lawful search can only be done when under judicial authorization where it is feasible to get one.[1]
- Burden of Proof
An individual alleging a breach of his or her Charter rights bears the burden of proving that violation on a balance of probabilities. That being said, if the individual can demonstrate that a police search was conducted without a warrant, that search will be presumed to be unreasonable unless shown to be justified.[2] The Crown then must prove the reasonableness of the search on a balance of probabilities. [3] Reasonableness of a search has both a subjective and objective component.[4]
- Entey to a Residence
The Police cannot enter into a private dwelling without a warrant, consent of the homeower(s), or without exigent circumstances.[5]
- ↑ Hunter v Southam Inc., [1984] 2 SCR 145, 1984 CanLII 33, per Dickson J ("where it is feasible to obtain prior authorization, ... such authorization is a precondition for a valid search and seizure ... ")
- ↑
Hunter v Southam Inc., supra
R v Golden, [2001] 3 SCR 679, 2001 SCC 83 (CanLII), per Iacobucci and Arbour JJ
R v Mann, 2004 SCC 52 (CanLII), per Iacobucci J
R v Feeney, 1997 CanLII 342 (CanLII), at para 54
- ↑ see R v Caslake, 1998 CanLII 838 (CanLII), per Lamer CJ, at para 11
- ↑ R v Bernshaw, 1995 CanLII 150 (SCC), per Sopinka J
- ↑ Feeney, supra, at para 44
Categories of Searches
There are several types of warrantless searches:
- Search by Consent
- Search Incident to Investigative Detention
- Search Incident to Arrest
- Search of Abandoned Property
- Search in Plain View
- Exigent Circumstances
- Statutory Warrantless Search Powers