Adjournments (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]*)\'\', <br> \[http\:\/\/canlii\.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) ([1-2][0-9]{3} [A-Z]+ [0-9]+\] \(CanLII\))\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3}}{" |
m Text replacement - "] (CanLII)}}" to " (CanLII)}}" |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ''R v Sanborn'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqcmp 2012 BCPC 41] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Skilnick J}} || crown not opposed -- adjournment denied | | ''R v Sanborn'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqcmp 2012 BCPC 41] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Skilnick J}} || crown not opposed -- adjournment denied | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Downey|fpf09|2011 ABQB 805 | | {{CanLIIR-S|Downey|fpf09|2011 ABQB 805 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB|Tilleman J}} ||failure to grant an adjournment for a self-rep overturned | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v Cole'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2bgp3 2010 NSCA 59] (CanLII){{TheCourtNSCA}} || crown adjournment of trial refused | | ''R v Cole'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2bgp3 2010 NSCA 59] (CanLII){{TheCourtNSCA}} || crown adjournment of trial refused | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| R v Brundia <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1tc1g 2007 ONCA 725] (CanLII){{TheCourtONCA}} || | | R v Brundia <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1tc1g 2007 ONCA 725] (CanLII){{TheCourtONCA}} || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Roebuck|5mh4|2001 ABQB 111 | | {{CanLIIR-S|Roebuck|5mh4|2001 ABQB 111 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB|Lee J}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v Nichols'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1ffww 2001 CanLII 5680] (ON C.A.){{perONCA|Laskin JA}} || refusal of adjournment mid-trial for firing counsel | | ''R v Nichols'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1ffww 2001 CanLII 5680] (ON C.A.){{perONCA|Laskin JA}} || refusal of adjournment mid-trial for firing counsel | ||
Revision as of 00:37, 28 January 2021
Case Digests
| Case Name | Summary |
|---|---|
| R v Kandola and Johal, 2012 BCSC 1012 (CanLII), per Romilly J |
adjournment for pre-sentence report denied |
| R v Sanborn, 2012 BCPC 41 (CanLII), per Skilnick J |
crown not opposed -- adjournment denied |
| R v Downey, 2011 ABQB 805 (CanLII), per Tilleman J | failure to grant an adjournment for a self-rep overturned |
| R v Cole, 2010 NSCA 59 (CanLII), per curiam |
crown adjournment of trial refused |
| R v Marshall, 2009 NSPC 6 (CanLII), per Tax J |
Trial adjournment granted |
| R v Oliver and Morrison, 2005 CanLII 3582 (2005) 194 CCC (3d) 92 (Ont. CA), per Doherty JA |
|
| R v Brundia 2007 ONCA 725 (CanLII), per curiam |
|
| R v Roebuck, 2001 ABQB 111 (CanLII), per Lee J | |
| R v Nichols, 2001 CanLII 5680 (ON C.A.), per Laskin JA |
refusal of adjournment mid-trial for firing counsel |
| R v JEB (1989), 1989 CanLII 1495 (NS CA), 52 CCC 224 (NSCA) |
|
| R v Smith, (1989), 52 CCC (3d) 90 (Ont. C.A.), 1989 CanLII 7222 (ON CA), per R MacDonald JA |
|
| R v Manhas, [1980] 1 SCR 591 1980 CanLII 72 (SCC), per Martland J |
|
| R v Barrette, [1977] 2 SCR 121, 1976 CanLII 80 (SCC), per Pigeon J |
|
| R v Spataro, 1972 CanLII 25 (SCC), [1974] SCR 253, per Judson J |
|
| R v Warren (1973), 14 CCC 188 (*no CanLII links) |
|
| Darville v The Queen (1956), 1956), 116 CCC 113, 25 C.R. 1, 1956 CanLII 463 (SCC), per Taschereau J |