Stay of Proceedings (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]*)\'\', <br> \[http\:\/\/canlii\.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) ([1-2][0-9]{3} [A-Z]+ [0-9]+\] \(CanLII\))\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3}}{"
m Text replacement - "] (CanLII)}}" to " (CanLII)}}"
Line 35: Line 35:
! Case Name !! Result !! Summary
! Case Name !! Result !! Summary
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Maskell|fm5zv|2011 ABPC 176] (CanLII)}}{{perABPC|Groves J}} || stay || force used while arresting for driving while disqualified
|{{CanLIIR-S|Maskell|fm5zv|2011 ABPC 176 (CanLII)}}{{perABPC|Groves J}} || stay || force used while arresting for driving while disqualified
|-
|-
|''R v Steele'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28z27 2010 ABQB 191] (CanLII){{perABQB| Macklin J}} || stay ||excessive force in arresting accused
|''R v Steele'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28z27 2010 ABQB 191] (CanLII){{perABQB| Macklin J}} || stay ||excessive force in arresting accused

Revision as of 23:31, 27 January 2021

Section 7: Prosecutor Abuse of Process

Case Name Result Summary
R v Chen,
2009 ONCJ 453 (CanLII), per Fairgrieve J
stayed breach s. 7 for crown changing mind to stay charges. Stay upheld.
R v Arcand,
2008 ONCA 595 (CanLII), per Cronk JA
denied alleged disclosure issues, laying additional charges, differential treatment of accused.

Section 7 - Disclosure

Case Name Result Summary
R v Vader,
2013 ABQB 68 (CanLII), per Ross J
not stayed
R v Tweedly,
2013 BCSC 910 (CanLII), per Greyell J
stayed Two police witnesses lost their notes. The notes were used in the ITO of a search warrant.

Section 12 - Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Case Name Result Summary
R v Tang
2011 ONCJ 525 (CanLII), per Reinhardt J
stay granted

Abuse by Police

Case Name Result Summary
R v Maskell, 2011 ABPC 176 (CanLII), per Groves J stay force used while arresting for driving while disqualified
R v Steele,
2010 ABQB 191 (CanLII), per Macklin J
stay excessive force in arresting accused

Delay