Stay of Proceedings (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]*)\'\', <br> \[http\:\/\/canlii\.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) ([1-2][0-9]{3} [A-Z]+ [0-9]+\] \(CanLII\))\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3}}{" |
m Text replacement - "] (CanLII)}}" to " (CanLII)}}" |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Maskell|fm5zv|2011 ABPC 176 | |{{CanLIIR-S|Maskell|fm5zv|2011 ABPC 176 (CanLII)}}{{perABPC|Groves J}} || stay || force used while arresting for driving while disqualified | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''R v Steele'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28z27 2010 ABQB 191] (CanLII){{perABQB| Macklin J}} || stay ||excessive force in arresting accused | |''R v Steele'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28z27 2010 ABQB 191] (CanLII){{perABQB| Macklin J}} || stay ||excessive force in arresting accused |
Revision as of 23:31, 27 January 2021
Section 7: Prosecutor Abuse of Process
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Chen, 2009 ONCJ 453 (CanLII), per Fairgrieve J |
stayed | breach s. 7 for crown changing mind to stay charges. Stay upheld. |
R v Arcand, 2008 ONCA 595 (CanLII), per Cronk JA |
denied | alleged disclosure issues, laying additional charges, differential treatment of accused. |
Section 7 - Disclosure
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Vader, 2013 ABQB 68 (CanLII), per Ross J |
not stayed | |
R v Tweedly, 2013 BCSC 910 (CanLII), per Greyell J |
stayed | Two police witnesses lost their notes. The notes were used in the ITO of a search warrant. |
Section 12 - Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Tang 2011 ONCJ 525 (CanLII), per Reinhardt J |
stay granted |
Abuse by Police
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Maskell, 2011 ABPC 176 (CanLII), per Groves J | stay | force used while arresting for driving while disqualified |
R v Steele, 2010 ABQB 191 (CanLII), per Macklin J |
stay | excessive force in arresting accused |