Child Pornography (Trial Verdicts): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\'\,<br> \[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-z0-9]+) ([0-9]+ [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \([a-zA-Z]+\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{"
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\'<br> \[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) ([1-2][0-9]+ [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(CanLII\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{"
Line 14: Line 14:
|''R v Douglas''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw4zq 2013 SKQB 33]] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}}|| guilty of poss'n and making avail. || through treatment of evidence and law
|''R v Douglas''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw4zq 2013 SKQB 33]] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}}|| guilty of poss'n and making avail. || through treatment of evidence and law
|-
|-
| ''R v Lorenz''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fsdc5 2012 SKQB 293] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}} || acquitted for making CP ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Lorenz|fsdc5|2012 SKQB 293 (CanLII)}}{{perSKQB|Schwann J}} || acquitted for making CP ||
|-
|-
''R v Jacques''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs3jm 2012 SKQB 277] (CanLII){{perSKQB|McMurtry J}} || guilty of possession and not guilty of making available || P2P case
{{CanLIIR-S|Jacques|fs3jm|2012 SKQB 277 (CanLII)}}{{perSKQB|McMurtry J}} || guilty of possession and not guilty of making available || P2P case
|-
|-
|  R v Clayton <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqr7d 2012 ABQB 196] (CanLII){{perABQB| Eidsvik J}} || conviction || gigatribe distribution
|  R v Clayton <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqr7d 2012 ABQB 196] (CanLII){{perABQB| Eidsvik J}} || conviction || gigatribe distribution
|-
|-
| ''R v Allart''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqc6k 2012 BCCA 100] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Groberman JA}} || conviction for poss’n CP ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Allart|fqc6k|2012 BCCA 100 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Groberman JA}} || conviction for poss’n CP ||
|-
|-
|  ''R v Jeffrey'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fpkt9 2012 SKPC 12] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Agnew J}} || guilty of distributing ||
|  ''R v Jeffrey'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fpkt9 2012 SKPC 12] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Agnew J}} || guilty of distributing ||
Line 28: Line 28:
| R v SS<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fm7rf 2011 SKPC 102] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Koskie J}} || not guilty ||judge could not determine age of youths in images
| R v SS<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fm7rf 2011 SKPC 102] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Koskie J}} || not guilty ||judge could not determine age of youths in images
|-
|-
''R v Carrano''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpgrn 2011 ONSC 7718] (CanLII){{perONSC|Trotter J}} || acquittal for innocent possession of CP||
{{CanLIIR-S|Carrano|fpgrn|2011 ONSC 7718 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Trotter J}} || acquittal for innocent possession of CP||
|-
|-
|  ''R v Jones''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fncds 2011 ONCA 632] (CanLII){{perONCA|Blair JA}} ||  || new trial ordered
|  ''R v Jones''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fncds 2011 ONCA 632] (CanLII){{perONCA|Blair JA}} ||  || new trial ordered
|-
|-
''R v Smith''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fq71j 2011 BCSC 1826] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Brown J}} || ||
{{CanLIIR-S|Smith|fq71j|2011 BCSC 1826 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Brown J}} || ||
|-
|-
''R v Love''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2fl9j 2011 ABPC 40] (CanLII){{perABPC|Philp J}} ||not guilty || not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession
{{CanLIIR-S|Love|2fl9j|2011 ABPC 40 (CanLII)}}{{perABPC|Philp J}} ||not guilty || not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession
|-
|-
|  R v R.D.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b7hh 2010 BCCA 313] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bennett JA}} || not guilty||
|  R v R.D.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b7hh 2010 BCCA 313] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bennett JA}} || not guilty||
Line 40: Line 40:
|  ''R v Garbett''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29qq4 2010 ONSC 2762] (CanLII){{perONSC|Tulloch J}} || ||
|  ''R v Garbett''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29qq4 2010 ONSC 2762] (CanLII){{perONSC|Tulloch J}} || ||
|-
|-
''R v Spencer''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp3pb 2011 SKCA 144] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Caldwell JA}} || conviction upheld ||
{{CanLIIR-S|Spencer|fp3pb|2011 SKCA 144 (CanLII)}}{{perSKCA|Caldwell JA}} || conviction upheld ||
|-
|-
''R v Leugner''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpf08 2011 SKQB 469] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Keene J}} || ||accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books
{{CanLIIR-S|Leugner|fpf08|2011 SKQB 469 (CanLII)}}{{perSKQB|Keene J}} || ||accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books
|-
|-
| ''R v Leugner''<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/29p3f 2010 SKPC 50] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kovatch J}} || guilty of importing and possession|| fictional stories of child sexual abuse
| ''R v Leugner''<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/29p3f 2010 SKPC 50] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kovatch J}} || guilty of importing and possession|| fictional stories of child sexual abuse
|-
|-
''R v Rudiger''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c72l 2010 BCPC 182] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Blaskovits J}} || guilty || possession; considered definition
{{CanLIIR-S|Rudiger|2c72l|2010 BCPC 182 (CanLII)}}{{perBCPC|Blaskovits J}} || guilty || possession; considered definition
|-
|-
''R v Pressacco''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2919s 2010 SKQB 114] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Currie J}} || guilty of possessing and accessing CP ||
{{CanLIIR-S|Pressacco|2919s|2010 SKQB 114 (CanLII)}}{{perSKQB|Currie J}} || guilty of possessing and accessing CP ||
|-
|-
|  R v C.M.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/24f51 2009 MBPC 35] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Martin J}} || guilty of making and possessing CP ||
|  R v C.M.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/24f51 2009 MBPC 35] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Martin J}} || guilty of making and possessing CP ||
Line 54: Line 54:
|  ''R v Grant''<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/22kq2 2009 BCCA 72] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty ||
|  ''R v Grant''<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/22kq2 2009 BCCA 72] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty ||
|-
|-
''R v Trapp''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/26h9x 2009 SKPC 109] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kolenick J}} || conviction for making CP available ||
{{CanLIIR-S|Trapp|26h9x|2009 SKPC 109 (CanLII)}}{{perSKPC|Kolenick J}} || conviction for making CP available ||
|-
|-
|  {{CanLIIR-S|Ballendine|fmdm1|2009 BCSC 1938 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC| Cullen J}} || not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else||
|  {{CanLIIR-S|Ballendine|fmdm1|2009 BCSC 1938 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC| Cullen J}} || not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else||
|-
|-
''R v Johannson''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/223vf 2008 SKQB 451] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Gabrielson J}} || guilty of making available ||
{{CanLIIR-S|Johannson|223vf|2008 SKQB 451 (CanLII)}}{{perSKQB|Gabrielson J}} || guilty of making available ||
|-
|-
|  ''R v Dittrich''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wr2f 2008 CanLII 19217] (ON SC){{perONSC|Jenkins J}} || guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making||
|  ''R v Dittrich''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wr2f 2008 CanLII 19217] (ON SC){{perONSC|Jenkins J}} || guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making||
|-
|-
''R v Dabrowski''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1sw9b 2007 ONCA 619] (CanLII){{perONCA|MacPherson JA}}|| ||
{{CanLIIR-S|Dabrowski|1sw9b|2007 ONCA 619 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|MacPherson JA}}|| ||
|-
|-
''R v Tripp''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ssbc 2007 NBPC 32] (CanLII){{perNBPC|Arseneault J}} || not guilty for possession||
{{CanLIIR-S|Tripp|1ssbc|2007 NBPC 32 (CanLII)}}{{perNBPC|Arseneault J}} || not guilty for possession||
|-
|-
|  ''R v Horvat''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n42j 2006 CanLII 13426] (ON SC){{perONSC|Lack J}} || guilty||
|  ''R v Horvat''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n42j 2006 CanLII 13426] (ON SC){{perONSC|Lack J}} || guilty||
Line 74: Line 74:
|  R v S. (V.P.)<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4xh7 2001 BCSC 619] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Bauman J}} || guilty  ||considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose
|  R v S. (V.P.)<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4xh7 2001 BCSC 619] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Bauman J}} || guilty  ||considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose
|-
|-
| ''R v Nedelec''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4wvm 2001 BCSC 1334] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Wedge J}} || guilty of possession || considers definition
| {{CanLIIR-S|Nedelec|4wvm|2001 BCSC 1334 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Wedge J}} || guilty of possession || considers definition
|-
|-
''R v Weir''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5qng 1998 ABQB 56] (CanLII){{perABQB|PLJ Smith J}} || guilty of distribution||
{{CanLIIR-S|Weir|5qng|1998 ABQB 56 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB|PLJ Smith J}} || guilty of distribution||


{{SCaseEnd}}
{{SCaseEnd}}

Revision as of 08:44, 1 February 2021

Case Digests

Case Name Result Summary
R v Tyler Perkins,
2013 ONSC 1807 (CanLII), per Ferguson J
evidence excluded S. 8, 9, 10(b) of Charter raised.
R v Giuseppe Michienzi,
2013 ONSC 1025 (CanLII), per Bryant J
guilt of poss'n, not guilty of making available
R v Douglas
2013 SKQB 33] (CanLII), per Schwann J
guilty of poss'n and making avail. through treatment of evidence and law
R v Lorenz, 2012 SKQB 293 (CanLII), per Schwann J acquitted for making CP
R v Jacques, 2012 SKQB 277 (CanLII), per McMurtry J guilty of possession and not guilty of making available P2P case
R v Clayton
2012 ABQB 196 (CanLII), per Eidsvik J
conviction gigatribe distribution
R v Allart, 2012 BCCA 100 (CanLII), per Groberman JA conviction for poss’n CP
R v Jeffrey,
2012 SKPC 12 (CanLII), per Agnew J
guilty of distributing
R v Wanamaker
2011 ABQB 310 (CanLII), per H McDonald J
guilty
R v SS
2011 SKPC 102 (CanLII), per Koskie J
not guilty judge could not determine age of youths in images
R v Carrano, 2011 ONSC 7718 (CanLII), per Trotter J acquittal for innocent possession of CP
R v Jones
2011 ONCA 632 (CanLII), per Blair JA
new trial ordered
R v Smith, 2011 BCSC 1826 (CanLII), per Brown J
R v Love, 2011 ABPC 40 (CanLII), per Philp J not guilty not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession
R v R.D.
2010 BCCA 313 (CanLII), per Bennett JA
not guilty
R v Garbett
2010 ONSC 2762 (CanLII), per Tulloch J
R v Spencer, 2011 SKCA 144 (CanLII), per Caldwell JA conviction upheld
R v Leugner, 2011 SKQB 469 (CanLII), per Keene J accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books
R v Leugner
2010 SKPC 50 (CanLII), per Kovatch J
guilty of importing and possession fictional stories of child sexual abuse
R v Rudiger, 2010 BCPC 182 (CanLII), per Blaskovits J guilty possession; considered definition
R v Pressacco, 2010 SKQB 114 (CanLII), per Currie J guilty of possessing and accessing CP
R v C.M.
2009 MBPC 35 (CanLII), per Martin J
guilty of making and possessing CP
R v Grant
2009 BCCA 72 (CanLII), per Finch CJ
guilty
R v Trapp, 2009 SKPC 109 (CanLII), per Kolenick J conviction for making CP available
R v Ballendine, 2009 BCSC 1938 (CanLII), per Cullen J not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else
R v Johannson, 2008 SKQB 451 (CanLII), per Gabrielson J guilty of making available
R v Dittrich
2008 CanLII 19217 (ON SC), per Jenkins J
guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making
R v Dabrowski, 2007 ONCA 619 (CanLII), per MacPherson JA
R v Tripp, 2007 NBPC 32 (CanLII), per Arseneault J not guilty for possession
R v Horvat
2006 CanLII 13426 (ON SC), per Lack J
guilty
R v Beattie
2005 CanLII 10273 (ON CA), per Laskin JA
acquittal overturned pornographic stories
R v J.E.I.
2005 BCCA 584 (CanLII), per Finch CJ
guilty considers dominant purpose
R v S. (V.P.)
2001 BCSC 619 (CanLII), per Bauman J
guilty considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose
R v Nedelec, 2001 BCSC 1334 (CanLII), per Wedge J guilty of possession considers definition
R v Weir, 1998 ABQB 56 (CanLII), per PLJ Smith J guilty of distribution