Child Pornography (Trial Verdicts): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\'\,<br> \[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-z0-9]+) ([0-9]+ [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \([a-zA-Z]+\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{" |
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\'<br> \[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) ([1-2][0-9]+ [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(CanLII\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{" |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|''R v Douglas''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw4zq 2013 SKQB 33]] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}}|| guilty of poss'n and making avail. || through treatment of evidence and law | |''R v Douglas''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw4zq 2013 SKQB 33]] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}}|| guilty of poss'n and making avail. || through treatment of evidence and law | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Lorenz|fsdc5|2012 SKQB 293 (CanLII)}}{{perSKQB|Schwann J}} || acquitted for making CP || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Jacques|fs3jm|2012 SKQB 277 (CanLII)}}{{perSKQB|McMurtry J}} || guilty of possession and not guilty of making available || P2P case | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Clayton <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqr7d 2012 ABQB 196] (CanLII){{perABQB| Eidsvik J}} || conviction || gigatribe distribution | | R v Clayton <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqr7d 2012 ABQB 196] (CanLII){{perABQB| Eidsvik J}} || conviction || gigatribe distribution | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Allart|fqc6k|2012 BCCA 100 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Groberman JA}} || conviction for poss’n CP || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v Jeffrey'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpkt9 2012 SKPC 12] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Agnew J}} || guilty of distributing || | | ''R v Jeffrey'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpkt9 2012 SKPC 12] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Agnew J}} || guilty of distributing || | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| R v SS<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm7rf 2011 SKPC 102] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Koskie J}} || not guilty ||judge could not determine age of youths in images | | R v SS<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm7rf 2011 SKPC 102] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Koskie J}} || not guilty ||judge could not determine age of youths in images | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Carrano|fpgrn|2011 ONSC 7718 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC|Trotter J}} || acquittal for innocent possession of CP|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v Jones''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fncds 2011 ONCA 632] (CanLII){{perONCA|Blair JA}} || || new trial ordered | | ''R v Jones''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fncds 2011 ONCA 632] (CanLII){{perONCA|Blair JA}} || || new trial ordered | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Smith|fq71j|2011 BCSC 1826 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Brown J}} || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Love|2fl9j|2011 ABPC 40 (CanLII)}}{{perABPC|Philp J}} ||not guilty || not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v R.D.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b7hh 2010 BCCA 313] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bennett JA}} || not guilty|| | | R v R.D.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b7hh 2010 BCCA 313] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bennett JA}} || not guilty|| | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| ''R v Garbett''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29qq4 2010 ONSC 2762] (CanLII){{perONSC|Tulloch J}} || || | | ''R v Garbett''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29qq4 2010 ONSC 2762] (CanLII){{perONSC|Tulloch J}} || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Spencer|fp3pb|2011 SKCA 144 (CanLII)}}{{perSKCA|Caldwell JA}} || conviction upheld || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Leugner|fpf08|2011 SKQB 469 (CanLII)}}{{perSKQB|Keene J}} || ||accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v Leugner''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/29p3f 2010 SKPC 50] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kovatch J}} || guilty of importing and possession|| fictional stories of child sexual abuse | | ''R v Leugner''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/29p3f 2010 SKPC 50] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kovatch J}} || guilty of importing and possession|| fictional stories of child sexual abuse | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Rudiger|2c72l|2010 BCPC 182 (CanLII)}}{{perBCPC|Blaskovits J}} || guilty || possession; considered definition | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Pressacco|2919s|2010 SKQB 114 (CanLII)}}{{perSKQB|Currie J}} || guilty of possessing and accessing CP || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v C.M.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/24f51 2009 MBPC 35] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Martin J}} || guilty of making and possessing CP || | | R v C.M.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/24f51 2009 MBPC 35] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Martin J}} || guilty of making and possessing CP || | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| ''R v Grant''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/22kq2 2009 BCCA 72] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty || | | ''R v Grant''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/22kq2 2009 BCCA 72] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Trapp|26h9x|2009 SKPC 109 (CanLII)}}{{perSKPC|Kolenick J}} || conviction for making CP available || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Ballendine|fmdm1|2009 BCSC 1938 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC| Cullen J}} || not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else|| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Ballendine|fmdm1|2009 BCSC 1938 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC| Cullen J}} || not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Johannson|223vf|2008 SKQB 451 (CanLII)}}{{perSKQB|Gabrielson J}} || guilty of making available || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v Dittrich''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wr2f 2008 CanLII 19217] (ON SC){{perONSC|Jenkins J}} || guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making|| | | ''R v Dittrich''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wr2f 2008 CanLII 19217] (ON SC){{perONSC|Jenkins J}} || guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Dabrowski|1sw9b|2007 ONCA 619 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|MacPherson JA}}|| || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Tripp|1ssbc|2007 NBPC 32 (CanLII)}}{{perNBPC|Arseneault J}} || not guilty for possession|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v Horvat''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n42j 2006 CanLII 13426] (ON SC){{perONSC|Lack J}} || guilty|| | | ''R v Horvat''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n42j 2006 CanLII 13426] (ON SC){{perONSC|Lack J}} || guilty|| | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
| R v S. (V.P.)<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4xh7 2001 BCSC 619] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Bauman J}} || guilty ||considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose | | R v S. (V.P.)<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4xh7 2001 BCSC 619] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Bauman J}} || guilty ||considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Nedelec|4wvm|2001 BCSC 1334 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Wedge J}} || guilty of possession || considers definition | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Weir|5qng|1998 ABQB 56 (CanLII)}}{{perABQB|PLJ Smith J}} || guilty of distribution|| | ||
{{SCaseEnd}} | {{SCaseEnd}} |
Revision as of 08:44, 1 February 2021
- < Criminal Law
- < Cases
|
Case Digests
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Tyler Perkins, 2013 ONSC 1807 (CanLII), per Ferguson J |
evidence excluded | S. 8, 9, 10(b) of Charter raised. |
R v Giuseppe Michienzi, 2013 ONSC 1025 (CanLII), per Bryant J |
guilt of poss'n, not guilty of making available | |
R v Douglas 2013 SKQB 33] (CanLII), per Schwann J |
guilty of poss'n and making avail. | through treatment of evidence and law |
R v Lorenz, 2012 SKQB 293 (CanLII), per Schwann J | acquitted for making CP | |
R v Jacques, 2012 SKQB 277 (CanLII), per McMurtry J | guilty of possession and not guilty of making available | P2P case |
R v Clayton 2012 ABQB 196 (CanLII), per Eidsvik J |
conviction | gigatribe distribution |
R v Allart, 2012 BCCA 100 (CanLII), per Groberman JA | conviction for poss’n CP | |
R v Jeffrey, 2012 SKPC 12 (CanLII), per Agnew J |
guilty of distributing | |
R v Wanamaker 2011 ABQB 310 (CanLII), per H McDonald J |
guilty | |
R v SS 2011 SKPC 102 (CanLII), per Koskie J |
not guilty | judge could not determine age of youths in images |
R v Carrano, 2011 ONSC 7718 (CanLII), per Trotter J | acquittal for innocent possession of CP | |
R v Jones 2011 ONCA 632 (CanLII), per Blair JA |
new trial ordered | |
R v Smith, 2011 BCSC 1826 (CanLII), per Brown J | ||
R v Love, 2011 ABPC 40 (CanLII), per Philp J | not guilty | not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession |
R v R.D. 2010 BCCA 313 (CanLII), per Bennett JA |
not guilty | |
R v Garbett 2010 ONSC 2762 (CanLII), per Tulloch J |
||
R v Spencer, 2011 SKCA 144 (CanLII), per Caldwell JA | conviction upheld | |
R v Leugner, 2011 SKQB 469 (CanLII), per Keene J | accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books | |
R v Leugner 2010 SKPC 50 (CanLII), per Kovatch J |
guilty of importing and possession | fictional stories of child sexual abuse |
R v Rudiger, 2010 BCPC 182 (CanLII), per Blaskovits J | guilty | possession; considered definition |
R v Pressacco, 2010 SKQB 114 (CanLII), per Currie J | guilty of possessing and accessing CP | |
R v C.M. 2009 MBPC 35 (CanLII), per Martin J |
guilty of making and possessing CP | |
R v Grant 2009 BCCA 72 (CanLII), per Finch CJ |
guilty | |
R v Trapp, 2009 SKPC 109 (CanLII), per Kolenick J | conviction for making CP available | |
R v Ballendine, 2009 BCSC 1938 (CanLII), per Cullen J | not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else | |
R v Johannson, 2008 SKQB 451 (CanLII), per Gabrielson J | guilty of making available | |
R v Dittrich 2008 CanLII 19217 (ON SC), per Jenkins J |
guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making | |
R v Dabrowski, 2007 ONCA 619 (CanLII), per MacPherson JA | ||
R v Tripp, 2007 NBPC 32 (CanLII), per Arseneault J | not guilty for possession | |
R v Horvat 2006 CanLII 13426 (ON SC), per Lack J |
guilty | |
R v Beattie 2005 CanLII 10273 (ON CA), per Laskin JA |
acquittal overturned | pornographic stories |
R v J.E.I. 2005 BCCA 584 (CanLII), per Finch CJ |
guilty | considers dominant purpose |
R v S. (V.P.) 2001 BCSC 619 (CanLII), per Bauman J |
guilty | considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose |
R v Nedelec, 2001 BCSC 1334 (CanLII), per Wedge J | guilty of possession | considers definition |
R v Weir, 1998 ABQB 56 (CanLII), per PLJ Smith J | guilty of distribution |