Kienapple (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\'\,<br> \[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-z0-9]+) ([0-9]+ [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \([a-zA-Z]+\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{" |
m Text replacement - "\|[\s]*\'\'R v ([^\']+)\'\',\<[Bb][Rr]\>[\s]*(\[[0-9]{4}\][\s]*[^,]+)\,[\s]*\[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9]+) ([0-9]{4} [a-zA-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(([^\)]*)\)\{\{" to "{{CanLIIRP-S|$1|$3|$4 ($5)|, $2}}{{" |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|''John v The Queen'',<br> [1985] 2 SCR 476, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftxp 1985 CanLII 15] (SCC){{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}|| | |''John v The Queen'',<br> [1985] 2 SCR 476, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftxp 1985 CanLII 15] (SCC){{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | {{CanLIIRP-S|Davis|1fql7|1999 CanLII 638 (SCC)|, [1999] 3 SCR 759}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | {{CanLIIRP-S|Prince|1ftr3|1986 CanLII 40 (SCC)|, [1986] 2 SCR 480}}{{perSCC|Dickson CJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | {{CanLIIRP-S|Pringle|1ft4b|1989 CanLII 65 (SCC)|, [1989] 1 SCR 1645}}{{perSCC|Lamer J}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | {{CanLIIRP-S|Wigman|1ftnb|1985 CanLII 1 (SCC)|, [1987] 1 SCR 246}}{{TheCourtSCC}}|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 14:02, 3 March 2021
Kienapple
1999 CanLII 638 (SCC), , [1999] 3 SCR 759, perLamer CJ|| R v Prince,
1986 CanLII 40 (SCC), , [1986] 2 SCR 480, perDickson CJ|| R v Pringle,
1989 CanLII 65 (SCC), , [1989] 1 SCR 1645, perLamer J|| R v Wigman,
1985 CanLII 1 (SCC), , [1987] 1 SCR 246, per curiam||
| Case Name | Summary |
|---|---|
| R v Hope, 2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII), per Stack J | sexual assault and sexual interference |
| R v Ramage, 2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII), per Doherty JA | Impaired & Dangerous driving valid |
| John v The Queen, [1985] 2 SCR 476, 1985 CanLII 15 (SCC), per Estey and Lamer JJ |