Adjournments (Cases): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - " C.R. " to " CR " Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| {{CanLIIR-N|Warren|(1973), 14 CCC 188}}|| | | {{CanLIIR-N|Warren|(1973), 14 CCC 188}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Darville|hsqkr|1956 CanLII 463 (SCC)|, 116 CCC 113, 25 | | {{CanLIIRP-S|Darville|hsqkr|1956 CanLII 463 (SCC)|, 116 CCC 113, 25 CR 1}}{{perSCC|Taschereau J}}|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 20:37, 9 March 2021
Case Digests
| Case Name | Summary |
|---|---|
| R v Kandola and Johal, 2012 BCSC 1012 (CanLII), per Romilly J | adjournment for pre-sentence report denied |
| R v Sanborn, 2012 BCPC 41 (CanLII), per Skilnick J | crown not opposed -- adjournment denied |
| R v Downey, 2011 ABQB 805 (CanLII), per Tilleman J | failure to grant an adjournment for a self-rep overturned |
| R v Cole, 2010 NSCA 59 (CanLII), per curiam | crown adjournment of trial refused |
| R v Marshall, 2009 NSPC 6 (CanLII), per Tax J | Trial adjournment granted |
| R v Oliver and Morrison, 2005 CanLII 3582 (2005), 194 CCC (3d) 92 (Ont. CA), per Doherty JA |
|
| R v Brundia, 2007 ONCA 725 (CanLII), per curiam | |
| R v Roebuck, 2001 ABQB 111 (CanLII), per Lee J | |
| R v Nichols, 2001 CanLII 5680 (ON C.A.), per Laskin JA | refusal of adjournment mid-trial for firing counsel |
| R v JEB, 1989 CanLII 1495 (NS CA), , 52 CCC 224 (NSCA) |
|
| R v Smith, 1989 CanLII 7222 (ON CA), , 52 CCC (3d) 90 (Ont. C.A.), per R MacDonald JA |
|
| R v Manhas, 1980 CanLII 72 (SCC), , [1980] 1 SCR 591, per Martland J |
|
| R v Barrette, 1976 CanLII 80 (SCC), [1977] 2 SCR 121, per Pigeon J |
|
| R v Spataro, 1972 CanLII 25 (SCC), , [1974] SCR 253, per Judson J |
|
| R v Warren(1973), 14 CCC 188(*no CanLII links) | |
| R v Darville, 1956 CanLII 463 (SCC), , 116 CCC 113, 25 CR 1, per Taschereau J |