Circumstantial Evidence (Case Digests): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([^\']+)\'\', \[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([^\s]+) ([0-9]{4} [^\s]+ [0-9]+)\] \(([^\)]+\))([^\{]+)\{" to "{{CanLIIRP|$1|$2|$3 ($4|$5}}{" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
*{{ | * {{CanLIIR|Frank|fpbqh|2011 BCSC 1716 (CanLII){{fix}} -- circumstantial case -- single fingerprint on duct tape used to bind victims -- guilty | ||
* | * {{CanLIIR|Grant|1pzxw|2006 ABPC 306 (CanLII)}}{{fix}} | ||
* | * {{CanLIIR|SWM|1m1b0|2005 BCSC 1601 (CanLII)}}{{fix}} -- conviction -- father was last person with child before discovery of injuries, coupled with evidence of past bad acts | ||
* Tsigaridas | * {{CanLIIRP|Tsigaridas|6k70|1994 CanLII 1289 (ON CA)|, [1994] O.J. No 1999 (Ont C.A.)}}{{fix}} -- acquittal -- evidence showing that keys to restaurant were shared with employees negates exclusive opportunity of owner to burn down business | ||
* | * {{CanLIIR-N|Keller|(1970) 1 CCC (2d) 203}} -- convicted -- fingerprint on matchbook found at scene sufficient to connect accused with break and enter. | ||
--> | --> | ||