Warrantless Searches (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
No edit summary
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([^\']+)\'\',[\s]*\<[Bb][Rr]\>[\s]*\[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([^\s]+)\s([0-9]{4} [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(([^\)]+)\)[\s]*\|" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 ($4)}}|"
Line 125: Line 125:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Fierro|fpn4t|2012 ABPC 1 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| detailed review of law
|{{CanLIIR-S|Fierro|fpn4t|2012 ABPC 1 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| detailed review of law
|-
|-
|''R v Grunwald'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b29n 2010 BCCA 288] (CanLII) ||N||N||N||  traffic check set-up; stops accused's vehicle, smells marijuana, sees large bags in back of truck; no expectation of privacy
|{{CanLIIR-S|Grunwald|2b29n|2010 BCCA 288 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||  traffic check set-up; stops accused's vehicle, smells marijuana, sees large bags in back of truck; no expectation of privacy
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIR-S|Harding|2b3lw|2010 ABCA 180 (CanLII)}}|| N || N||N|| police stop car, obscured plates, rental car,  two large bags in the back, smell marijuana -- search incident to arrest finds drugs -- no breach of s.10(b)
| {{CanLIIR-S|Harding|2b3lw|2010 ABCA 180 (CanLII)}}|| N || N||N|| police stop car, obscured plates, rental car,  two large bags in the back, smell marijuana -- search incident to arrest finds drugs -- no breach of s.10(b)
Line 157: Line 157:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Duong|4z0q|2002 BCCA 43 (CanLII)}}|| N || || || no s.8 breach -- smell of marijuana coming out front door of house
|{{CanLIIR-S|Duong|4z0q|2002 BCCA 43 (CanLII)}}|| N || || || no s.8 breach -- smell of marijuana coming out front door of house
|-
|-
|''R v Zagar'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5rc4 1998 ABPC 59] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Zagar|5rc4|1998 ABPC 59 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||Y||  
||Y||-||Y||  
|-
|-
|''R v Lawrence'',<br> [1994] O.J. No. 3272 {{NOCANLII}} || N||N||N|| smell fresh burnt marijuana; allowed search down pants of accused
|''R v Lawrence'',<br> [1994] O.J. No. 3272 {{NOCANLII}} || N||N||N|| smell fresh burnt marijuana; allowed search down pants of accused
Line 175: Line 174:
|R v Gorman and Gorman,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fs99l 2012 ONSC 4605] (CanLII) ||N||-||N|| search warrant
|R v Gorman and Gorman,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fs99l 2012 ONSC 4605] (CanLII) ||N||-||N|| search warrant
|-
|-
|''R v Franko'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fr8f7 2012 ABQB 282] (CanLII) ||N||-||N|| confidential source reports drug dealers activities
|{{CanLIIR-S|Franko|fr8f7|2012 ABQB 282 (CanLII)}}||N||-||N|| confidential source reports drug dealers activities
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Perpeluk|frdgx|2012 SKQB 189 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||Y|| two confidential informers give tips  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Perpeluk|frdgx|2012 SKQB 189 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||Y|| two confidential informers give tips  
Line 181: Line 180:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Quach|fqhdh|2012 ABPC 57 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| evidence admitted, judge had no issue with motive of informer   
|{{CanLIIR-S|Quach|fqhdh|2012 ABPC 57 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| evidence admitted, judge had no issue with motive of informer   
|-
|-
|''R v Soto'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpf39 2011 ONCA 828] (CanLII) || N||N||N|| informer reports dealing out of a house; police corroborate with observations of house
|{{CanLIIR-S|Soto|fpf39|2011 ONCA 828 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| informer reports dealing out of a house; police corroborate with observations of house
|-
|-
|''R v Bick'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fncsc 2011 ONCJ 503] (CanLII)|| N ||N||N|| search of house based on tip  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Bick|fncsc|2011 ONCJ 503 (CanLII)}}|| N ||N||N|| search of house based on tip  
|-
|-
|''R v Hillgardener'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/28zrk 2010 ABCA 80] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Hillgardener|28zrk|2010 ABCA 80 (CanLII)}}|| N|| N||N|| anonymous informer was reliable
|| N|| N||N|| anonymous informer was reliable
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Jir|2d71m|2010 BCCA 497 (CanLII)}}|| Y||N||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Jir|2d71m|2010 BCCA 497 (CanLII)}}|| Y||N||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Safi'',  <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29m7q 2010 ABCA 151] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Safi|29m7q|2010 ABCA 151 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Raphael'',<br> [2010] O.J. No. 5916, 2010 ONSC 5709  
|''R v Raphael'',<br> [2010] O.J. No. 5916, 2010 ONSC 5709  
Line 199: Line 196:
||N||N||N||  
||N||N||N||  
|-
|-
|''R v Morris'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1xm66 2008 ONCJ 276] (CanLII)  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Morris|1xm66|2008 ONCJ 276 (CanLII)}}||Y|| ? || Y|| s. 487 search warrant invalid where based on anonymous tipster with "superficial confirmation". Shotgun evidence excluded.
||Y|| ? || Y|| s. 487 search warrant invalid where based on anonymous tipster with "superficial confirmation". Shotgun evidence excluded.
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Tetreault|1tnfs|2007 BCSC 1624 (CanLII)}}|| N ||-||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Tetreault|1tnfs|2007 BCSC 1624 (CanLII)}}|| N ||-||N||
Line 206: Line 202:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Wing|1wvg6|2007 BCSC 1959 (CanLII)}}||Y||?||N||  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Wing|1wvg6|2007 BCSC 1959 (CanLII)}}||Y||?||N||  
|-
|-
|''R v McCallum'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1nw48 2006 SKQB 287] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|McCallum|1nw48|2006 SKQB 287 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|''Goodine v R'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q247 2006 NBCA 109] (CanLII)|| N||?||N||
|''Goodine v R'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q247 2006 NBCA 109] (CanLII)|| N||?||N||
Line 289: Line 284:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Helary|fpql0|2012 SKPC 15 (CanLII)}}|| Y||?||Y||  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Helary|fpql0|2012 SKPC 15 (CanLII)}}|| Y||?||Y||  
|-
|-
|''R v Laliberte'', <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpg3p 2011 SKPC 190] (CanLII)|| Y||-||N|| source info brings police to house; they are invited into vestibule; smell marijuana; enter into reminder of house after accused runs away. No consent to enter.
|{{CanLIIR-S|Laliberte|fpg3p|2011 SKPC 190 (CanLII)}}|| Y||-||N|| source info brings police to house; they are invited into vestibule; smell marijuana; enter into reminder of house after accused runs away. No consent to enter.
|-
|-
|''R v Got'',<Br> 2011 BCPC 328 {{NOCANLII}}||Y||?||?|| warrantless entry into residence found in violation of s.8
|''R v Got'',<Br> 2011 BCPC 328 {{NOCANLII}}||Y||?||?|| warrantless entry into residence found in violation of s.8
Line 295: Line 290:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Stevens|fphjm|2011 ONCJ 794 (CanLII)}}|| Y ||-||Y|| police enter home without warrant and search house
|{{CanLIIR-S|Stevens|fphjm|2011 ONCJ 794 (CanLII)}}|| Y ||-||Y|| police enter home without warrant and search house
|-
|-
|''R v Thompson'', <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29sdv 2010 ONSC 2862] (CanLII) ||Y||-||N|| search of home found drugs  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Thompson|29sdv|2010 ONSC 2862 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||N|| search of home found drugs  
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIR-S|Watson|27q30|2010 ONSC 448 (CanLII)}}||Y|| || Y|| pat-down search finds drugs; followed by search of residence
| {{CanLIIR-S|Watson|27q30|2010 ONSC 448 (CanLII)}}||Y|| || Y|| pat-down search finds drugs; followed by search of residence
Line 306: Line 301:
! Case Name !! Summary
! Case Name !! Summary
|-
|-
| ''R v Mann'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fsdzc 2012 BCSC 1247] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Mann|fsdzc|2012 BCSC 1247 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| R v Munro & Munro,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fphhc 2012 ONSC 43] (CanLII) || cell phone search indicent to arrest -- admitted  
| R v Munro & Munro,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fphhc 2012 ONSC 43] (CanLII) || cell phone search indicent to arrest -- admitted  
Line 312: Line 307:
| {{CanLIIR-S|Groves|fm7j4|2011 ONCJ 350 (CanLII)}}||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Groves|fm7j4|2011 ONCJ 350 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| ''R v Dorey'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnvbd 2011 NSPC 85] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Dorey|fnvbd|2011 NSPC 85 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| ''R v Hiscoe'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnv9d 2011 NSPC 84] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Hiscoe|fnv9d|2011 NSPC 84 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| ''R v Manley'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2fpgj 2011 ONCA 128] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Manley|2fpgj|2011 ONCA 128 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| ''R v Fearon'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2f869 2010 ONCJ 645] (CanLII)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Fearon|2f869|2010 ONCJ 645 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIR-S|Zahrebelny|2ftfr|2010 NSPC 91 (CanLII)}}||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Zahrebelny|2ftfr|2010 NSPC 91 (CanLII)}}||

Revision as of 15:46, 28 February 2021