Warrantless Searches (Cases): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([^\']+)\'\',[\s]*\<[Bb][Rr]\>[\s]*\[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([^\s]+)\s([0-9]{4} [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(([^\)]+)\)[\s]*\|" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 ($4)}}|" |
||
Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Fierro|fpn4t|2012 ABPC 1 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| detailed review of law | |{{CanLIIR-S|Fierro|fpn4t|2012 ABPC 1 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| detailed review of law | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Grunwald|2b29n|2010 BCCA 288 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| traffic check set-up; stops accused's vehicle, smells marijuana, sees large bags in back of truck; no expectation of privacy | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Harding|2b3lw|2010 ABCA 180 (CanLII)}}|| N || N||N|| police stop car, obscured plates, rental car, two large bags in the back, smell marijuana -- search incident to arrest finds drugs -- no breach of s.10(b) | | {{CanLIIR-S|Harding|2b3lw|2010 ABCA 180 (CanLII)}}|| N || N||N|| police stop car, obscured plates, rental car, two large bags in the back, smell marijuana -- search incident to arrest finds drugs -- no breach of s.10(b) | ||
Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Duong|4z0q|2002 BCCA 43 (CanLII)}}|| N || || || no s.8 breach -- smell of marijuana coming out front door of house | |{{CanLIIR-S|Duong|4z0q|2002 BCCA 43 (CanLII)}}|| N || || || no s.8 breach -- smell of marijuana coming out front door of house | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Zagar|5rc4|1998 ABPC 59 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||Y|| | ||
||Y||-||Y|| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|''R v Lawrence'',<br> [1994] O.J. No. 3272 {{NOCANLII}} || N||N||N|| smell fresh burnt marijuana; allowed search down pants of accused | |''R v Lawrence'',<br> [1994] O.J. No. 3272 {{NOCANLII}} || N||N||N|| smell fresh burnt marijuana; allowed search down pants of accused | ||
Line 175: | Line 174: | ||
|R v Gorman and Gorman,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fs99l 2012 ONSC 4605] (CanLII) ||N||-||N|| search warrant | |R v Gorman and Gorman,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fs99l 2012 ONSC 4605] (CanLII) ||N||-||N|| search warrant | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Franko|fr8f7|2012 ABQB 282 (CanLII)}}||N||-||N|| confidential source reports drug dealers activities | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Perpeluk|frdgx|2012 SKQB 189 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||Y|| two confidential informers give tips | |{{CanLIIR-S|Perpeluk|frdgx|2012 SKQB 189 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||Y|| two confidential informers give tips | ||
Line 181: | Line 180: | ||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Quach|fqhdh|2012 ABPC 57 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| evidence admitted, judge had no issue with motive of informer | |{{CanLIIR-S|Quach|fqhdh|2012 ABPC 57 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| evidence admitted, judge had no issue with motive of informer | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Soto|fpf39|2011 ONCA 828 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| informer reports dealing out of a house; police corroborate with observations of house | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Bick|fncsc|2011 ONCJ 503 (CanLII)}}|| N ||N||N|| search of house based on tip | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Hillgardener|28zrk|2010 ABCA 80 (CanLII)}}|| N|| N||N|| anonymous informer was reliable | ||
|| N|| N||N|| anonymous informer was reliable | |||
|- | |- | ||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Jir|2d71m|2010 BCCA 497 (CanLII)}}|| Y||N||N|| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Jir|2d71m|2010 BCCA 497 (CanLII)}}|| Y||N||N|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Safi|29m7q|2010 ABCA 151 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| | ||
||N||N||N|| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|''R v Raphael'',<br> [2010] O.J. No. 5916, 2010 ONSC 5709 | |''R v Raphael'',<br> [2010] O.J. No. 5916, 2010 ONSC 5709 | ||
Line 199: | Line 196: | ||
||N||N||N|| | ||N||N||N|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Morris|1xm66|2008 ONCJ 276 (CanLII)}}||Y|| ? || Y|| s. 487 search warrant invalid where based on anonymous tipster with "superficial confirmation". Shotgun evidence excluded. | ||
||Y|| ? || Y|| s. 487 search warrant invalid where based on anonymous tipster with "superficial confirmation". Shotgun evidence excluded. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Tetreault|1tnfs|2007 BCSC 1624 (CanLII)}}|| N ||-||N|| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Tetreault|1tnfs|2007 BCSC 1624 (CanLII)}}|| N ||-||N|| | ||
Line 206: | Line 202: | ||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Wing|1wvg6|2007 BCSC 1959 (CanLII)}}||Y||?||N|| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Wing|1wvg6|2007 BCSC 1959 (CanLII)}}||Y||?||N|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|McCallum|1nw48|2006 SKQB 287 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N|| | ||
||N||N||N|| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|''Goodine v R'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q247 2006 NBCA 109] (CanLII)|| N||?||N|| | |''Goodine v R'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q247 2006 NBCA 109] (CanLII)|| N||?||N|| | ||
Line 289: | Line 284: | ||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Helary|fpql0|2012 SKPC 15 (CanLII)}}|| Y||?||Y|| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Helary|fpql0|2012 SKPC 15 (CanLII)}}|| Y||?||Y|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Laliberte|fpg3p|2011 SKPC 190 (CanLII)}}|| Y||-||N|| source info brings police to house; they are invited into vestibule; smell marijuana; enter into reminder of house after accused runs away. No consent to enter. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''R v Got'',<Br> 2011 BCPC 328 {{NOCANLII}}||Y||?||?|| warrantless entry into residence found in violation of s.8 | |''R v Got'',<Br> 2011 BCPC 328 {{NOCANLII}}||Y||?||?|| warrantless entry into residence found in violation of s.8 | ||
Line 295: | Line 290: | ||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Stevens|fphjm|2011 ONCJ 794 (CanLII)}}|| Y ||-||Y|| police enter home without warrant and search house | |{{CanLIIR-S|Stevens|fphjm|2011 ONCJ 794 (CanLII)}}|| Y ||-||Y|| police enter home without warrant and search house | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |{{CanLIIR-S|Thompson|29sdv|2010 ONSC 2862 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||N|| search of home found drugs | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Watson|27q30|2010 ONSC 448 (CanLII)}}||Y|| || Y|| pat-down search finds drugs; followed by search of residence | | {{CanLIIR-S|Watson|27q30|2010 ONSC 448 (CanLII)}}||Y|| || Y|| pat-down search finds drugs; followed by search of residence | ||
Line 306: | Line 301: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Mann|fsdzc|2012 BCSC 1247 (CanLII)}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Munro & Munro,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fphhc 2012 ONSC 43] (CanLII) || cell phone search indicent to arrest -- admitted | | R v Munro & Munro,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fphhc 2012 ONSC 43] (CanLII) || cell phone search indicent to arrest -- admitted | ||
Line 312: | Line 307: | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Groves|fm7j4|2011 ONCJ 350 (CanLII)}}|| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Groves|fm7j4|2011 ONCJ 350 (CanLII)}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Dorey|fnvbd|2011 NSPC 85 (CanLII)}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Hiscoe|fnv9d|2011 NSPC 84 (CanLII)}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Manley|2fpgj|2011 ONCA 128 (CanLII)}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Fearon|2f869|2010 ONCJ 645 (CanLII)}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Zahrebelny|2ftfr|2010 NSPC 91 (CanLII)}}|| | | {{CanLIIR-S|Zahrebelny|2ftfr|2010 NSPC 91 (CanLII)}}|| |