Guilty Pleas (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([^\']+)\'\',[\s]*<[Bb][Rr]\>[\s]*\[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9]+) ([0-9]{4} [a-zA-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(([^\)]+)\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 ($4)}}{" |
No edit summary |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Hector|1fb50|2000 CanLII 5725 (ON CA)}}{{perONCA|Finlayson J}} | upheld | }} | {{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Hector|1fb50|2000 CanLII 5725 (ON CA)}}{{perONCA|Finlayson J}} | upheld | }} | ||
{{TCase| | {{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Clermont|234d8|1996 CanLII 10244 (NS CA)|, (1996) NSJ 170}}{{perNSCA|Clarke CJ}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Pottie|1mpvm|1996 CanLII 5604 (NSCA)}}{{perNSCA|Puglsey JA}}| | }} | {{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Pottie|1mpvm|1996 CanLII 5604 (NSCA)}}{{perNSCA|Puglsey JA}}| | }} | ||
{{TCase| | {{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Murphy|1mqdm|1995 CanLII 4329 (NSCA)|, [1995] NSJ No. 41}}{{perNSCA|Chipman JA}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|SK|231v4|1995 CanLII 8926 (ON CA)}}{{perONCA|Carthy JA}} | granted | }} | {{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|SK|231v4|1995 CanLII 8926 (ON CA)}}{{perONCA|Carthy JA}} | granted | }} | ||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Morris|1dd0p|1994 CanLII 1669 (BC CA}}{{perBCCA|Legg JA}} | granted | }} | {{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Morris|1dd0p|1994 CanLII 1669 (BC CA}}{{perBCCA|Legg JA}} | granted | }} | ||
{{TCase| | {{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Porter|1mqmv|1994 CanLII 4019 (NS CA)|, (1994) 132 NSR 107}}{{perNSCA|Puglsey JA}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase| | {{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|RT|1p793|1992 CanLII 2834 (ON CA)|, (1992) 10 OR (3d) 514 (Ont. CA)}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}} | appeal dismissed| }} | ||
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Gautreau|1thb5|1991 CanLII 4232 (NB CA)}}{{TheCourt}} | dismissed | appeal of failed withdraw dismissed - plea with experienced counsel and confirmed in court}} | {{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Gautreau|1thb5|1991 CanLII 4232 (NB CA)}}{{TheCourt}} | dismissed | appeal of failed withdraw dismissed - plea with experienced counsel and confirmed in court}} | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
{{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Rubenstein|22kn1|1987 CanLII 2834 (ON CA)}}{{perONCA|Zuber JA}} | denied| The guilty plea made with counsel. There was a joint statement of fact submitted. Joint recommendation was rejected. }} | {{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Rubenstein|22kn1|1987 CanLII 2834 (ON CA)}}{{perONCA|Zuber JA}} | denied| The guilty plea made with counsel. There was a joint statement of fact submitted. Joint recommendation was rejected. }} | ||
{{TCase| | {{TCase|{{CanLIIR-SN|Melanson| (1983) NSJ 453}}| | }} | ||
{{TCase| | {{TCase|{{CanLIIRP-S|Igoe| (1982) 54 NSR 113}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase| {{CanLIIR-SN|MacNeil|(1982) 51 NSR 2d 541}}| | }} | {{TCase| {{CanLIIR-SN|MacNeil|(1982) 51 NSR 2d 541}}| | }} | ||
{{TCaseEnd}} | {{TCaseEnd}} |
Revision as of 08:04, 4 March 2021
Withdraw of Guilty Plea
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Granados, 2017 MBQB 69 (CanLII), per Menzies J | Granted | The judge found that the plea was not fully informed of consequences of the plea. |
R v Fiske, 2014 SKQB 152 (CanLII), per Konkin J | Granted | |
R v Meadus, 2014 ONCA 445 (CanLII), per curiam, per curiam | Denied | charged with sexual interference. |
R v Gililov, 2014 ONCJ 94 (CanLII), per Bourque J | Denied | |
R v Dupin, 2013 SKPC 119 (CanLII), per Cardinal J | Denied | Charged with drug trafficking. Plead guilty with counsel in open court. Judge did not confirm elements of plea, no facts were read. |
R v McLaughlin, 2013 NBCA 38 (CanLII), per curiam | denied | |
R v Wiebe, 2012 BCCA 519 (CanLII), per Ryan JA | denied | |
R v Lewis, 2012 SKCA 81 (CanLII), per Jackson JA | Granted | accused changed plea with lawyer on day of trial. He never admitted offence and appeared confused. |
R v Williams, 2012 BCCA 314 (CanLII), per Frankel JA | denied | |
R v Sutton, 2012 NLCA 35 (CanLII), per Rowe JA | Granted | |
R v Downes, 2012 ONCJ 45 (CanLII), per Marin J | denied | |
R v Greenall and Collins, 2011 BCPC 28 (CanLII), per Skilnick J | withdraw denied | |
R v Lamontagne, 2011 QCCA 1486 (CanLII), per curiam | GP upheld | |
R v Chisholm, 2010 ONSC 3877 (CanLII), per Mulligan J | denied | argued that was not given an option but to plead guilty |
R v Messervey, 2010 NSCA 55 (CanLII), per Beveridge JA | ||
R v IBB, 2009 SKPC 76 (CanLII), per Whelan J | detailed summary of law | |
R v White, 2009 NSSC 313 (CanLII), per Cacchione J | ||
R v Maniaol, 2009 ABPC 390 (CanLII), per Allen J | granted | |
R v McCollum, 2008 NSCA 36 (CanLII), per Bateman JA | ||
R v DWS, 2008 BCCA 453 (CanLII), per Bauman JA | upheld | |
R v KDH, 2007 ABPC 264 (CanLII), per LeGrandeur J | withdraw granted | |
R v Leonard, 2007 SKCA 128 (CanLII), per Richards JA | updheld | |
R v Nevin, 2006 NSCA 72 (CanLII), per Bateman JA | ||
R v Dodge, 2005 NSPC 24 (CanLII), per Gibson J | guilty plea withdrawn due to false acceptance to help another (see para 22 to 25) | |
R v Moore, 2004 BCPC 560 (CanLII), per Brecknell J | withdraw denied | |
R v Gold, 2004 BCCA 179 (CanLII), per Finch CJ | ||
R v McIntosh, 2004 NSCA 19 (CanLII), per Hamilton JA | ||
R v Barry, 2004 NSCA 145 (CanLII), per Bateman JA | ||
R v Wetmore, 2003 ABQB 350 (CanLII), per Macklin J | denied | |
R v Hallam, 2003 BCPC 201 (CanLII), per Brecknell J | withdraw denied | |
R v Moser, 2002 CanLII 49649 (ON SC), per Hill J | withdraw denied | |
R v Hector, 2000 CanLII 5725 (ON CA), per Finlayson J | upheld | |
R v Clermont, 1996 CanLII 10244 (NS CA), , (1996) NSJ 170, per Clarke CJ |
||
R v Pottie, 1996 CanLII 5604 (NSCA), per Puglsey JA | ||
R v Murphy, 1995 CanLII 4329 (NSCA), , [1995] NSJ No. 41, per Chipman JA |
||
R v SK, 1995 CanLII 8926 (ON CA), per Carthy JA | granted | |
R v Morris, 1994 CanLII 1669 (BC CA, per Legg JA | granted | |
R v Porter, 1994 CanLII 4019 (NS CA), , (1994) 132 NSR 107, per Puglsey JA |
||
R v RT, 1992 CanLII 2834 (ON CA), , (1992) 10 OR (3d) 514 (Ont. CA), per Doherty JA |
appeal dismissed | |
R v Gautreau, 1991 CanLII 4232 (NB CA), per curiam | dismissed | appeal of failed withdraw dismissed - plea with experienced counsel and confirmed in court |
R v Rubenstein, 1987 CanLII 2834 (ON CA), per Zuber JA | denied | The guilty plea made with counsel. There was a joint statement of fact submitted. Joint recommendation was rejected. |
R v Melanson, (1983) NSJ 453(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Igoe, (1982) 54 NSR 113 {{{3}}}, {{{4}}} |
||
R v MacNeil, (1982) 51 NSR 2d 541(*no CanLII links) |