Warrant Searches (Cases): Difference between revisions
m 1 revision imported |
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1''," |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary | ! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Mahmood,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnr5s 2011 ONCA 693] (CanLII) | |''R v Mahmood'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnr5s 2011 ONCA 693] (CanLII) | ||
||N||-|| warrant for cell phone number log upheld | ||N||-|| warrant for cell phone number log upheld | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Ngo,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnsl3 2011 ONSC 6676] (CanLII) | |''R v Ngo'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnsl3 2011 ONSC 6676] (CanLII) | ||
||N||-|| search warrant upheld on s. 8 challenge | ||N||-|| search warrant upheld on s. 8 challenge | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Nguyen,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/flxb7 2011 ONCA 465] (CanLII) | |''R v Nguyen'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/flxb7 2011 ONCA 465] (CanLII) | ||
|| || ||search warrant challenged; no violation | || || ||search warrant challenged; no violation | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
||Y||?|| | ||Y||?|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Darby,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fps2j 2012 ABCA 27] (CanLII) || |||| ITO upheld anonymous informer | |''R v Darby'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fps2j 2012 ABCA 27] (CanLII) || |||| ITO upheld anonymous informer | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Dionisi,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fprmp 2012 ABCA 20] (CanLII) || |||| ITO upheld, based on anonymous informer | |''R v Dionisi'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fprmp 2012 ABCA 20] (CanLII) || |||| ITO upheld, based on anonymous informer | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Morgan,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpmhg 2012 ONCA 28] (CanLII) |||||| ITO found valid despite errors in affidavit | |''R v Morgan'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpmhg 2012 ONCA 28] (CanLII) |||||| ITO found valid despite errors in affidavit | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary | ! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Afshar,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/274z7 2009 ABPC 368] (CanLII) ||Y||Y|| The search warrant to find cocaine and money was founded valid. The ITO contained "conclusory statements" and the informants credibility could not be tested. Certain information was a general knowledge. Such as ownership of the vehicle and occupancy of the residence. | |''R v Afshar'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/274z7 2009 ABPC 368] (CanLII) ||Y||Y|| The search warrant to find cocaine and money was founded valid. The ITO contained "conclusory statements" and the informants credibility could not be tested. Certain information was a general knowledge. Such as ownership of the vehicle and occupancy of the residence. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Fan,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fwk7p 2013 BCSC 445] (CanLII) ||N||N|| search warrant of residence based on informer upheld | |''R v Fan'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fwk7p 2013 BCSC 445] (CanLII) ||N||N|| search warrant of residence based on informer upheld | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Odette<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw5kq 2013 ONCJ 62] (CanLII) ||N||N|| residental search on a drug warrant | |R v Odette<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw5kq 2013 ONCJ 62] (CanLII) ||N||N|| residental search on a drug warrant | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary | ! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Bulatci, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqxsv 2012 NWTCA 6] (CanLII)||Y || N|| wiretap of accused in prison violated s.8 but admissible | |''R v Bulatci'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqxsv 2012 NWTCA 6] (CanLII)||Y || N|| wiretap of accused in prison violated s.8 but admissible | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Martin, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2b3ls 2010 NBCA 41] (CanLII) ||Y ||N|| | |''R v Martin'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2b3ls 2010 NBCA 41] (CanLII) ||Y ||N|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Della Penna,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpl3t 2012 BCCA 3] (CanLII) || || || wiretap allowed on appeal | |R v Della Penna,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpl3t 2012 BCCA 3] (CanLII) || || || wiretap allowed on appeal | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary | ! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.24 !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Ramage,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bkq5 2010 ONCA 488] (CanLII) ||Y||N|| | |''R v Ramage'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bkq5 2010 ONCA 488] (CanLII) ||Y||N|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Emshey,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bmxc 2010 ABPC 237] (CanLII) ||Y||N|| | |''R v Emshey'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bmxc 2010 ABPC 237] (CanLII) ||Y||N|| | ||
|} | |} | ||