Precedent - Agreed Statement of Fact: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{HeaderTemplates}}
{{Precedent Terms of Use}}
==Agreed Statement of Fact==
==Agreed Statement of Fact==
{|class="wikitable" style="width: 650px; background-color:white"
{|class="wikitable" style="width: 650px; background-color:white"

Revision as of 09:47, 20 April 2021

PRECEDENT TERMS OF USE

All forms, templates and precedents, including anything found on this page, can be used without the need for any attribution.

Agreed Statement of Fact

Agreed Statement of Facts

C A N A D A File# ________________
PROVINCE OF [PROVINCE]
COUNTY OF [COUNTY]

IN THE [LEVEL OF COURT] OF [PROVINCE]
([name] Region)

BETWEEN:

HIS MAJESTY THE KING


– and –

[ACCUSED NAME]




Agreed Statement of Facts
[describe whether it is for trial under s. 655 or for an Application]




This statement of facts is agreed to for the purposes of providing an evidentiary record for the [type hearing]. Any text within this agreed statement of fact that would tend to paraphrase, summarize or suggest a preferred interpretation of a source document, or contradict a source document, shout not be considered agreed upon as a fact beyond dispute but rather is merely a characterization and/or interpretation that is intended to assist the Court. Further, this agreed statement of facts is to be understood and interpreted in light of any viva voce testimony on issues before the court.

It should also be stressed that nothing in this should be considered acceptance of admissibility of the supporting documents on the basis of relevancy or hearsay. The parties agree to the authenticity of the supporting documents.

Statement of Facts
  1. ...


ALL OF WHICH IS AGREED UPON

_______________________
[Counsel 1]
Counsel for [party 1]

_______________________
[Counsel 2]
Counsel for [party 2]

_______________________
[Counsel 3]
Counsel for [party 3]

<gdoc id="1Et13GjPn4Lc4DSwollMQE26nqxc-eh7SQhUcL-zsYJM" width="900" height="1200" />