Immigration Consequences from a Conviction: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 206: Line 206:
; "Term of Imprisonment"
; "Term of Imprisonment"
The phrase "term of imprisonment" found in s. 36 of the IRPA has a different meaning than in the Criminal Code. Under IRPA it ''does not'' refer conditional sentence orders.<ref>
The phrase "term of imprisonment" found in s. 36 of the IRPA has a different meaning than in the Criminal Code. Under IRPA it ''does not'' refer conditional sentence orders.<ref>
{{CanLIIRC|Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)|h6pmh|2017 SCC 50 (CanLII)}}{{perSCC|Côté J}}<br>
{{CanLIIRPC|Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)|h6pmh|2017 SCC 50 (CanLII)|[2017] 2 SCR 289}}{{perSCC|Côté J}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Line 249: Line 249:


Under s. 50 IRPA, the imposition of a term of imprisonment will have the effect of staying any removal orders. But a probation order stay removal.<ref>
Under s. 50 IRPA, the imposition of a term of imprisonment will have the effect of staying any removal orders. But a probation order stay removal.<ref>
{{CanLIIRC|Cuskic c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration)|4kq3|2000 CanLII 16271 (CAF)|[2001] 2 RCF 3}}, ''per'' Létourneau JA
{{CanLIIRPC|Cuskic c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration)|4kq3|2000 CanLII 16271 (CAF)|[2001] 2 RCF 3}}, ''per'' Létourneau JA
</ref>
</ref>


Section 50 IRPA also has the effect of staying removal while the accused has pending charges in Canada.
Section 50 IRPA also has the effect of staying removal while the accused has pending charges in Canada.
{{CanLIIRC|Collins v Canada (Attorney General)|fqf07|2012 FC 268 (CanLII)}}, ''per'' Near J<br>
{{CanLIIRPC|Collins v Canada (Attorney General)|fqf07|2012 FC 268 (CanLII)|406 FTR 87}}, ''per'' Near J<br>
</ref>
</ref>