Racial Identity in Sentencing: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: wikieditor |
No edit summary Tag: wikieditor |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{HeaderPrinciples}} | {{HeaderPrinciples}} | ||
==General Principles== | ==General Principles== | ||
{{seealso|Aboriginal Sentencing Principles and Factors}} | |||
Persons of African descent may be entitled to request an "Impact of Race and Culture Assessment" (IRCA) report to assist the sentencing judge.<ref> | Persons of African descent may be entitled to request an "Impact of Race and Culture Assessment" (IRCA) report to assist the sentencing judge.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Anderson|jhjwd|2021 NSCA 62 (CanLII)|405 CCC (3d) 1}}{{perNSCA|Derrick JA}} | {{CanLIIRP|Anderson|jhjwd|2021 NSCA 62 (CanLII)|405 CCC (3d) 1}}{{perNSCA|Derrick JA}} | ||
Revision as of 19:35, 24 April 2023
| This page was last substantively updated or reviewed December 2021. (Rev. # 83479) |
General Principles
Persons of African descent may be entitled to request an "Impact of Race and Culture Assessment" (IRCA) report to assist the sentencing judge.[1] The IRCA report is able to provide relevant systemic and background factors to the court.[2]
Moral culpability must be assessed in the context of "historic factors and systemic racism," which may provide a mitigating effect on moral blameworthiness.[3]
A sentencing judge should consider the "impact that social and economic deprivation, historical disadvantage, diminished and non-existent opportunities, and restricted options may have had on the offender’s moral responsibility." [4] They can also use that background to "better understand how to view" the index offence.[5]
Failure to inquire into race-related factors may be an error of law.[6]