Procedure for Review of a Judicial Authorization: Difference between revisions
Created page with "==General Principles== {{seealso|Voir Dire#Challenging Warrant Validity}} When an accused person seeks to challenge an ITO supporting a warrant by cross-examination of the informant the procedure should go as follows:<ref> {{CanLIIRP|Wilson|fllg6|2011 BCCA 252 (CanLII)|272 CCC (3d) 269}}{{perBCCA|Frankel JA}} (3:0){{atsL|fllg6|62| to 67, 69}}<br> </ref> # The trial judge should determine whether a voir dire is necessary and, if so, whether the calling of evidence shoul..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==General Principles== | ==General Principles== | ||
{{seealso|Voir Dire#Challenging Warrant Validity}} | {{seealso|Voir Dire#Challenging Warrant Validity|Judicial Authorization Standard of Review}} | ||
When an accused person seeks to challenge an ITO supporting a warrant by cross-examination of the informant the procedure should go as follows:<ref> | When an accused person seeks to challenge an ITO supporting a warrant by cross-examination of the informant the procedure should go as follows:<ref> | ||