Definition of Dwelling House: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
* the character of the building.
* the character of the building.


Detached building on private property does not usually amount to dwelling. <ref>R v N.M.,  [http://canlii.ca/t/1sg9k 2007 CanLII 31570] (ON S.C.)</ref>  
Detached building on private property does not usually amount to dwelling. <ref>R v NM,  [http://canlii.ca/t/1sg9k 2007 CanLII 31570] (ON S.C.){{perONSC|Hill J}}</ref>  


An incomplete building does not constitute a dwelling.<ref>R v Sappier</ref> However, an abandoned building however is one.<ref>R v DeWolfe (1988), 82 N.S.R.(2d) 175 (CA){{NOCANLII}}</ref>
An incomplete building does not constitute a dwelling.<ref>R v Sappier</ref> However, an abandoned building however is one.<ref>R v DeWolfe (1988), 82 N.S.R.(2d) 175 (CA){{NOCANLII}}</ref>


A driveway is not a dwelling house; it is a place where people drive and park their vehicles.<ref>
A driveway is not a dwelling house; it is a place where people drive and park their vehicles.<ref>
R v Evans, [http://canlii.ca/t/1frf4 1996 CanLII 248] (SCC), [1996] 1 SCR 8 at para 32
R v Evans, [http://canlii.ca/t/1frf4 1996 CanLII 248] (SCC), [1996] 1 SCR 8{{Plurality}} at para 32
</ref>
</ref>


A motel room,<ref> R v Henderson, [1975] 1 WWR 360 (BCPC)</ref> camp,<ref>
A motel room,<ref> R v Henderson, [1975] 1 WWR 360 (BCPC){{NOCANLII}}</ref> camp,<ref>
R v Nowlan,  [http://canlii.ca/t/23c2s 2009 NBQB 117] (CanLII)</ref> can be a dwelling.
R v Nowlan,  [http://canlii.ca/t/23c2s 2009 NBQB 117] (CanLII){{perNBQB|Ferguson J}}</ref> can be a dwelling.


A house which is not occupied can still retain its character as a dwelling-house.<ref>
A house which is not occupied can still retain its character as a dwelling-house.<ref>
R v DeWolfe - a house that was emptied a month prior was a dwelling</ref>
DeWolfe{{supra}} - a house that was emptied a month prior was a dwelling</ref>


A garage or parkade under the residential building is also a dwelling-house.<ref>
A garage or parkade under the residential building is also a dwelling-house.<ref>
R v Chomik, [http://canlii.ca/t/flb4s 2011 ABPC 152] (CanLII)
R v Chomik, [http://canlii.ca/t/flb4s 2011 ABPC 152] (CanLII){{perABPC|Kerby J}}
</ref>
</ref>


Certain types places will lose their dwelling-house status from non-use. A house may be abandoned for a period of time, dilapidated, boarded-up, and "not intending to be live[d] in ...again" rendering it a non-dwelling.<ref>
Certain types places will lose their dwelling-house status from non-use. A house may be abandoned for a period of time, dilapidated, boarded-up, and "not intending to be live[d] in ...again" rendering it a non-dwelling.<ref>
R v Paquet [1978] O.J. No 980 (O.C.A.), [http://canlii.ca/t/htwb2 1978 CanLII 2510] (ON CA) - abandoned three years, falling apart<br>
R v Paquet [1978] O.J. No 980 (O.C.A.), [http://canlii.ca/t/htwb2 1978 CanLII 2510] (ON CA){{perONCA|Martin JA}} - abandoned three years, falling apart<br>
R v Tapley, [http://canlii.ca/t/fwx33 2013 NBPC 8] (CanLII) - 3 months abandoned
R v Tapley, [http://canlii.ca/t/fwx33 2013 NBPC 8] (CanLII){{perNBPC|Brien J}} - 3 months abandoned
</ref>
</ref>


A "dwelling-house" for the purpose of a conviction under s. 348 for a break and enter will ''not'' include a building under construction that has not been occupied as a residence.<ref>
A "dwelling-house" for the purpose of a conviction under s. 348 for a break and enter will ''not'' include a building under construction that has not been occupied as a residence.<ref>
R v Sappier, [http://canlii.ca/t/1m1t3 2005 NBPC 37] (CanLII)
R v Sappier, [http://canlii.ca/t/1m1t3 2005 NBPC 37] (CanLII){{perNBPC|FErguson J}}
</ref>
</ref>


Line 57: Line 57:


The meaning of curtilage has been defined in domestic courts as "the land or yard adjoining a house, usually within an enclosure".<Ref>
The meaning of curtilage has been defined in domestic courts as "the land or yard adjoining a house, usually within an enclosure".<Ref>
R v Le (TD), [http://canlii.ca/t/frj5d 2011 MBCA 83] (CanLII) at para 83<br>
R v Le (TD), [http://canlii.ca/t/frj5d 2011 MBCA 83] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Scott CJ}} at para 83<br>
R v Beune, [http://canlii.ca/t/1knr3 2005 BCPC 175] (CanLII) at para31<br>
R v Beune, [http://canlii.ca/t/1knr3 2005 BCPC 175] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Dhillon J}} at para 31<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Revision as of 22:28, 11 November 2018

General Principles

See also: Break and Enter (Offence)

"Dwelling house" is defined in section 2:

s. 2
...
“dwelling-house” means the whole or any part of a building or structure that is kept or occupied as a permanent or temporary residence, and includes

(a) a building within the curtilage of a dwelling-house that is connected to it by a doorway or by a covered and enclosed passage-way, and
(b) a unit that is designed to be mobile and to be used as a permanent or temporary residence and that is being used as such a residence;

...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 2; R.S., 1985, c. 11 (1st Supp.), s. 2, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 2, 203, c. 31 (1st Supp.), s. 61, c. 1 (2nd Supp.), s. 213, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 10, c. 35 (2nd Supp.), s. 34, c. 32 (4th Supp.), s. 55, c. 40 (4th Supp.), s. 2; 1990, c. 17, s. 7; 1991, c. 1, s. 28, c. 40, s. 1, c. 43, ss. 1, 9; 1992, c. 20, s. 216, c. 51, s. 32; 1993, c. 28, s. 78, c. 34, s. 59; 1994, c. 44, s. 2; 1995, c. 29, ss. 39, 40, c. 39, s. 138; 1997, c. 23, s. 1; 1998, c. 30, s. 14; 1999, c. 3, s. 25, c. 5, s. 1, c. 25, s. 1(Preamble), c. 28, s. 155; 2000, c. 12, s. 91, c. 25, s. 1(F); 2001, c. 32, s. 1, c. 41, ss. 2, 131; 2002, c. 7, s. 137, c. 22, s. 324; 2003, c. 21, s. 1; 2004, c. 3, s. 1; 2005, c. 10, s. 34, c. 38, s. 58, c. 40, ss. 1, 7; 2006, c. 14, s. 1; 2007, c. 13, s. 1; 2012, c.1, s. 160, c. 19, s. 371.


– CCC

Factors to consider include:[1]

  • the intention of the builder;
  • the traditional use;
  • the type of temporary use;
  • the seasonal use;
  • the actual use; and
  • the character of the building.

Detached building on private property does not usually amount to dwelling. [2]

An incomplete building does not constitute a dwelling.[3] However, an abandoned building however is one.[4]

A driveway is not a dwelling house; it is a place where people drive and park their vehicles.[5]

A motel room,[6] camp,[7] can be a dwelling.

A house which is not occupied can still retain its character as a dwelling-house.[8]

A garage or parkade under the residential building is also a dwelling-house.[9]

Certain types places will lose their dwelling-house status from non-use. A house may be abandoned for a period of time, dilapidated, boarded-up, and "not intending to be live[d] in ...again" rendering it a non-dwelling.[10]

A "dwelling-house" for the purpose of a conviction under s. 348 for a break and enter will not include a building under construction that has not been occupied as a residence.[11]

Curtilage
"Curtilage" in US law is meant to "include all buildings in close proximity to a dwelling, which are continually used for carrying on domestic employment; or such place as is necessary and convenient to a dwelling and is habitually used for family purposes".[12]

The meaning of curtilage has been defined in domestic courts as "the land or yard adjoining a house, usually within an enclosure".[13]

  1. ↑ R v Sappier, 2005 NBPC 37 (CanLII)
  2. ↑ R v NM, 2007 CanLII 31570 (ON S.C.), per Hill J
  3. ↑ R v Sappier
  4. ↑ R v DeWolfe (1988), 82 N.S.R.(2d) 175 (CA)(*no CanLII links)
  5. ↑ R v Evans, 1996 CanLII 248 (SCC), [1996] 1 SCR 8 at para 32
  6. ↑ R v Henderson, [1975] 1 WWR 360 (BCPC)(*no CanLII links)
  7. ↑ R v Nowlan, 2009 NBQB 117 (CanLII), per Ferguson J
  8. ↑ DeWolfe, supra - a house that was emptied a month prior was a dwelling
  9. ↑ R v Chomik, 2011 ABPC 152 (CanLII), per Kerby J
  10. ↑ R v Paquet [1978] O.J. No 980 (O.C.A.), 1978 CanLII 2510 (ON CA), per Martin JA - abandoned three years, falling apart
    R v Tapley, 2013 NBPC 8 (CanLII), per Brien J - 3 months abandoned
  11. ↑ R v Sappier, 2005 NBPC 37 (CanLII), per FErguson J
  12. ↑ United States v Potts, 297 F.2d 68 [6th Cir. 1961]
  13. ↑ R v Le (TD), 2011 MBCA 83 (CanLII), per Scott CJ at para 83
    R v Beune, 2005 BCPC 175 (CanLII), per Dhillon J at para 31
Retrieved from "https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php?title=Definition_of_Dwelling_House&oldid=10527"