Offences Found to be Unconstitutional: Difference between revisions
m 1 revision imported |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The provision under s. 230 relating to constructive murder was found to be unconstitutional.<ref> | The provision under s. 230 relating to constructive murder was found to be unconstitutional.<ref> | ||
R v Vaillancourt, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fthw 1987 CanLII 2] (SCC), [1987] 2 SCR 636<br> | R v Vaillancourt, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fthw 1987 CanLII 2] (SCC), [1987] 2 SCR 636{{perSCC|Lamer J}}<br> | ||
R v Martineau, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fssd 1990 CanLII 80] (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 633<br> | R v Martineau, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fssd 1990 CanLII 80] (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 633{{perSCC|Lamer J}}<br> | ||
see [[Murder (Offence)]] for details<Br> | see [[Murder (Offence)]] for details<Br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
In December 2013, s. 210, 212(1)(j), and 213(1)(c) were found to be unconstitutional.<ref> | In December 2013, s. 210, 212(1)(j), and 213(1)(c) were found to be unconstitutional.<ref> | ||
Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford, [2013] 3 SCR 1101, [http://canlii.ca/t/g2f56 2013 SCC 72] (CanLII) | Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford, [2013] 3 SCR 1101, [http://canlii.ca/t/g2f56 2013 SCC 72] (CanLII){{perSCC| McLachlin CJ}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
{{seealso|Counselling or Aiding Suicide (Offence)}} | {{seealso|Counselling or Aiding Suicide (Offence)}} | ||
Both s. 14 and 241 are unconstitutional insofar as they "prohibit physician‑assisted dying for competent adults who seek such assistance as a result of a grievous and irremediable medical condition that causes enduring and intolerable suffering".<ref> | Both s. 14 and 241 are unconstitutional insofar as they "prohibit physician‑assisted dying for competent adults who seek such assistance as a result of a grievous and irremediable medical condition that causes enduring and intolerable suffering".<ref> | ||
Carter v Canada (Attorney General), [http://canlii.ca/t/gg5z4 2015 SCC 5] (CanLII) | Carter v Canada (Attorney General), [http://canlii.ca/t/gg5z4 2015 SCC 5] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 18 November 2018
- < Procedure and Practice
- < Pre-Trial and Trial Matters
Introduction
Several offences that were found to be unconstitutional by the court remain within the Code but are deemed to have no force and effect.
Anal Intercourse
Constructive Murder
The provision under s. 230 relating to constructive murder was found to be unconstitutional.[1]
- ↑
R v Vaillancourt, 1987 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1987] 2 SCR 636, per Lamer J
R v Martineau, 1990 CanLII 80 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 633, per Lamer J
see Murder (Offence) for details
Abortion
Prostitution
In December 2013, s. 210, 212(1)(j), and 213(1)(c) were found to be unconstitutional.[1]
- ↑ Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford, [2013] 3 SCR 1101, 2013 SCC 72 (CanLII), per McLachlin CJ
Assisted Suicide
Both s. 14 and 241 are unconstitutional insofar as they "prohibit physician‑assisted dying for competent adults who seek such assistance as a result of a grievous and irremediable medical condition that causes enduring and intolerable suffering".[1]
- ↑ Carter v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5 (CanLII), per curiam
Defamatory Libel
- Defamatory Libel (Offence) - one form of defamatory libel described in s. 301 was found unconstitutional.