Kienapple (Cases): Difference between revisions
m 1 revision imported |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Hope,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnjm2 2011 NLTD 143] (CanLII) ||sexual assault and sexual interference | | R v Hope,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fnjm2 2011 NLTD 143] (CanLII){{perNLSC|Stack J}} ||sexual assault and sexual interference | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Ramage,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bkq5 2010 ONCA 488] (CanLII)|| Impaired & Dangerous driving valid | | R v Ramage,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bkq5 2010 ONCA 488] (CanLII){{perONCA|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid | ||
|- | |- | ||
| John v The Queen,<br> [1985] 2 SCR 476, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftxp 1985 CanLII 15] (SCC)|| | | John v The Queen,<br> [1985] 2 SCR 476, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftxp 1985 CanLII 15] (SCC){{perSCC| Estey and Lamer JJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Davis,<br>[1999] 3 SCR 759, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fql7 1999 CanLII 638] (SCC)|| | | R v Davis,<br>[1999] 3 SCR 759, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fql7 1999 CanLII 638] (SCC){{perSCC| Lamer CJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Prince,<br> [1986] 2 SCR 480, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftr3 1986 CanLII 40] (SCC)|| | | R v Prince,<br> [1986] 2 SCR 480, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftr3 1986 CanLII 40] (SCC){{perSCC| Dickson CJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Pringle,<br> [1989] 1 SCR 1645, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ft4b 1989 CanLII 65] (SCC)|| | | R v Pringle,<br> [1989] 1 SCR 1645, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ft4b 1989 CanLII 65] (SCC){{perSCC|Lamer J}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Wigman,<br> [1987] 1 SCR 246, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftnb 1985 CanLII 1] (SCC)|| | | R v Wigman,<br> [1987] 1 SCR 246, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftnb 1985 CanLII 1] (SCC){{TheCourt}}|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 19:56, 25 November 2018
Kienapple
| Case Name | Summary |
|---|---|
| R v Hope, 2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII), per Stack J |
sexual assault and sexual interference |
| R v Ramage, 2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII), per Doherty JA |
Impaired & Dangerous driving valid |
| John v The Queen, [1985] 2 SCR 476, 1985 CanLII 15 (SCC), per Estey and Lamer JJ |
|
| R v Davis, [1999] 3 SCR 759, 1999 CanLII 638 (SCC), per Lamer CJ |
|
| R v Prince, [1986] 2 SCR 480, 1986 CanLII 40 (SCC), per Dickson CJ |
|
| R v Pringle, [1989] 1 SCR 1645, 1989 CanLII 65 (SCC), per Lamer J |
|
| R v Wigman, [1987] 1 SCR 246, 1985 CanLII 1 (SCC), per curiam |