Similar Fact Evidence (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "C.C.C." to "CCC"
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
{{TCaseHeader}}
{{TCaseHeader}}


{{TCase|R v Edwards,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/g7jhm 2014 ONSC 3729] (CanLII) |admitted| multiple robberies }}
{{TCase|R v Edwards,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/g7jhm 2014 ONSC 3729] (CanLII){{perONSC|Donohue J}} |admitted| multiple robberies }}


{{TCase|R v Donszelmann, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g6t2f 2014 ABQB 284] (CanLII), | admitted | multiple fraudulent sales made by accused admissible across all charges  }}
{{TCase|R v Donszelmann, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g6t2f 2014 ABQB 284] (CanLII){{perABQB|Clackson J}} | admitted | multiple fraudulent sales made by accused admissible across all charges  }}


{{TCase|R v T.I.E., <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g6r8t 2014 MBCA 40] (CanLII)|admitted | sexual assault against two boys. }}
{{TCase|R v T.I.E., <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/g6r8t 2014 MBCA 40] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Monnin and Burnett JJA}}|admitted | sexual assault against two boys. }}


{{TCase|R v D.L.W.,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fz49v 2013 BCSC 1016] (CanLII) | admitted| detailed summary of law by Romilly J. multiple victims of sexual assault.}}
{{TCase|R v DLW,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fz49v 2013 BCSC 1016] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Romilly J}} | admitted| detailed summary of law by Romilly J. multiple victims of sexual assault.}}


{{TCase|R v J.W.,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw3mm 2013 ONCA 89] (CanLII) | admitted |Appeal court overrules failure to admit similar fact evidence}}
{{TCase|R v J.W.,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw3mm 2013 ONCA 89] (CanLII){{perONCA|Weiler JA}} | admitted |Appeal court overrules failure to admit similar fact evidence}}


{{TCase|R v Fletcher<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw8kj 2013 ABCA 74] (CanLII) | Not admitted | }}
{{TCase|R v Fletcher<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw8kj 2013 ABCA 74] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} | Not admitted | }}


{{TCase|R v JR<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fvf3m 2012 CanLII 81292] (NL SCTD) |  admitted| }}
{{TCase|R v JR<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fvf3m 2012 CanLII 81292] (NL SCTD){{perNLSC|Goodridge J}} |  admitted| }}


{{TCase|R v Edwards<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw0gv 2013 ONSC 835] (CanLII) | Not admitted| SFE of two prior incidents going to identity rejected}}
{{TCase|R v Edwards<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw0gv 2013 ONSC 835] (CanLII){{perONSC|Mennie J}} | Not admitted| SFE of two prior incidents going to identity rejected}}


{{TCase| R v O’Quinn<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/ftnz4 2012 CanLII 67731] (NL PC) | admitted ( limited purpose)|The accused was charged with domestic violence offences against girlfriend. There were 4 prior instances of violence against 4 prior girlfriends.}}
{{TCase| R v O’Quinn<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/ftnz4 2012 CanLII 67731] (NL PC){{perNLPC|}} | admitted ( limited purpose)|The accused was charged with domestic violence offences against girlfriend. There were 4 prior instances of violence against 4 prior girlfriends.}}


{{TCase| R v Patey<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frxxg 2012 CanLII 37589] (NL SCTD) | admitted| }}
{{TCase| R v Patey<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frxxg 2012 CanLII 37589] (NL SCTD){{perNLSC|Seaborn J}} | admitted| }}


{{TCase| R v Logan<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqcwp 2012 BCCA 102] (CanLII) | admitted | }}
{{TCase| R v Logan<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqcwp 2012 BCCA 102] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Saunders JA}} | admitted | }}


{{TCase| R v Webb<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpqw2 2012 CanLII 1972] (NL SCTD) | Not admitted| }}
{{TCase| R v Webb<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpqw2 2012 CanLII 1972] (NL SCTD){{perNLSC|Goodridge J}} | Not admitted| }}


{{TCase| R v Blea<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpw8w 2012 ABCA 41] (CanLII)| admitted | similar fact evidence admitted of two prior sexual assaults }}
{{TCase| R v Blea<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpw8w 2012 ABCA 41] (CanLII){{TheCourt}}| admitted | similar fact evidence admitted of two prior sexual assaults }}


{{TCase| R v Boden<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpmdx 2011 BCPC 366] (CanLII) | Not admitted| }}
{{TCase| R v Boden<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fpmdx 2011 BCPC 366] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Giardini J}} | Not admitted| }}


{{TCase|R v Carpenter<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/27k3l 2010 BCCA 27] (CanLII) | admitted | Two complainants reported similar sexual assaults involving an attack by a man without pants who would put a pillow case over the complainant's head. DNA linking the accused was found at scene of one of two assaults. }}
{{TCase|R v Carpenter<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/27k3l 2010 BCCA 27] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Hall JA}} | admitted | Two complainants reported similar sexual assaults involving an attack by a man without pants who would put a pillow case over the complainant's head. DNA linking the accused was found at scene of one of two assaults. }}


{{TCase|R v Jesse,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28gkd 2010 BCCA 108] (CanLII) |admitted |  Upheld at 2012 SCC 21.}}
{{TCase|R v Jesse,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28gkd 2010 BCCA 108] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Chiasson JA}} |admitted |  Upheld at 2012 SCC 21.}}


{{TCase| R v J. H.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q3wl 2006 CanLII 40664] (ONCA) | Not admitted| the accused was alleged to have sexually assault his 12 year old step-sister---SFE was of victim's report of consensual oral sex years before--court said consensual sex separate from sexual assault }}
{{TCase| R v J. H.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q3wl 2006 CanLII 40664] (ONCA){{perONCA|Lang JA}} | Not admitted| the accused was alleged to have sexually assault his 12 year old step-sister---SFE was of victim's report of consensual oral sex years before--court said consensual sex separate from sexual assault }}


{{TCase|R v Brown, <br>[2006] OJ No 5276 (ONCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/1v3h4 2006 CanLII 60340] (ON CA)|admitted | }}
{{TCase|R v Brown, <br>[2006] OJ No 5276 (ONCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/1v3h4 2006 CanLII 60340] (ON CA){{TheCourt}}|admitted | }}


{{TCase|R v Morin, <br>[2005] OJ No 4402 (ONCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/1lsh9 2005 CanLII 37252] (ON CA) |admitted | }}
{{TCase|R v Morin, <br>[2005] OJ No 4402 (ONCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/1lsh9 2005 CanLII 37252] (ON CA){{TheCourt}} |admitted | }}


{{TCase|R v W(S), <br>[2004] OJ No 4164 (ONCA) |admitted | }}
{{TCase|R v W(S), <br>[2004] OJ No 4164 (ONCA){{NOCANLII}} |admitted | }}


{{TCase|R v Grabowski, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1pp2l 2004 BCSC 328] (CanLII) | admitted  | 5 instances of arson in the same geographical area within 2 hours.}}
{{TCase|R v Grabowski, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1pp2l 2004 BCSC 328] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Bennett J}} | admitted  | 5 instances of arson in the same geographical area within 2 hours.}}


{{TCase|R v Stewart,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1gclz 2004 BCCA 56] (CanLII) | admitted | The accused was a doctor accused of touching female patients. He claimed the touching was accidental.  }}
{{TCase|R v Stewart,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1gclz 2004 BCCA 56] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Hall JA}} | admitted | The accused was a doctor accused of touching female patients. He claimed the touching was accidental.  }}


{{TCase|R v Blake (2003), <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1fzl6  2003 CanLII 13682] (ON CA), 181 CCC (3d) 169 (Ont. C.A.), aff'd [http://canlii.ca/t/1j0wd 2004 SCC 69] (CanLII) | rejected | The evidence consisted of prior touching of children aged 10 years or under on two occasions in the past. Both prior incidents involved genital touching and occurred in private. The accused told one of the children that he was sorry and that it would not happen again. The court found the similarities lacking in detail and non-specific conduct.}}
{{TCase|R v Blake (2003), <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1fzl6  2003 CanLII 13682] (ON CA), 181 CCC (3d) 169 (Ont. C.A.){{perONCA|Simmons JA}} (2:1) aff'd [http://canlii.ca/t/1j0wd 2004 SCC 69] (CanLII){{TheCourtSCC}} | rejected | The evidence consisted of prior touching of children aged 10 years or under on two occasions in the past. Both prior incidents involved genital touching and occurred in private. The accused told one of the children that he was sorry and that it would not happen again. The court found the similarities lacking in detail and non-specific conduct.}}


{{TCase|R v Shearing,<br>[2002] 3 SCR 33, [http://canlii.ca/t/51rb 2002 SCC 58] (CanLII) | | }}
{{TCase|R v Shearing,<br>[2002] 3 SCR 33, [http://canlii.ca/t/51rb 2002 SCC 58] (CanLII){{perSCC|Binnie J}} | | }}


{{TCase|R v KW, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/6hxm 1996 CanLII 396] (ON CA)| not admitted | The accused was charged with two counts of sexual assault in relation to two complainants. Few facts are given by Court of Appeal. Judge admitted the similar fact evidence. Court of Appeal disagreed and found it as "insufficiently similar".}}
{{TCase|R v KW, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/6hxm 1996 CanLII 396] (ON CA){{TheCourt}}| not admitted | The accused was charged with two counts of sexual assault in relation to two complainants. Few facts are given by Court of Appeal. Judge admitted the similar fact evidence. Court of Appeal disagreed and found it as "insufficiently similar".}}


{{TCaseEnd}}
{{TCaseEnd}}

Revision as of 21:00, 1 December 2018

Similar Fact Evidence

Case Name Result Summary
R v Edwards,
2014 ONSC 3729 (CanLII), per Donohue J
admitted multiple robberies
R v Donszelmann,
2014 ABQB 284 (CanLII), per Clackson J
admitted multiple fraudulent sales made by accused admissible across all charges
R v T.I.E.,
2014 MBCA 40 (CanLII), per Monnin and Burnett JJA
admitted sexual assault against two boys.
R v DLW,
2013 BCSC 1016 (CanLII), per Romilly J
admitted detailed summary of law by Romilly J. multiple victims of sexual assault.
R v J.W.,
2013 ONCA 89 (CanLII), per Weiler JA
admitted Appeal court overrules failure to admit similar fact evidence
R v Fletcher
2013 ABCA 74 (CanLII), per curiam
Not admitted
R v JR
2012 CanLII 81292 (NL SCTD), per Goodridge J
admitted
R v Edwards
2013 ONSC 835 (CanLII), per Mennie J
Not admitted SFE of two prior incidents going to identity rejected
R v O’Quinn
2012 CanLII 67731 (NL PC), per [[Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador|]]
admitted ( limited purpose) The accused was charged with domestic violence offences against girlfriend. There were 4 prior instances of violence against 4 prior girlfriends.
R v Patey
2012 CanLII 37589 (NL SCTD), per Seaborn J
admitted
R v Logan
2012 BCCA 102 (CanLII), per Saunders JA
admitted
R v Webb
2012 CanLII 1972 (NL SCTD), per Goodridge J
Not admitted
R v Blea
2012 ABCA 41 (CanLII), per curiam
admitted similar fact evidence admitted of two prior sexual assaults
R v Boden
2011 BCPC 366 (CanLII), per Giardini J
Not admitted
R v Carpenter
2010 BCCA 27 (CanLII), per Hall JA
admitted Two complainants reported similar sexual assaults involving an attack by a man without pants who would put a pillow case over the complainant's head. DNA linking the accused was found at scene of one of two assaults.
R v Jesse,
2010 BCCA 108 (CanLII), per Chiasson JA
admitted Upheld at 2012 SCC 21.
R v J. H.
2006 CanLII 40664 (ONCA), per Lang JA
Not admitted the accused was alleged to have sexually assault his 12 year old step-sister---SFE was of victim's report of consensual oral sex years before--court said consensual sex separate from sexual assault
R v Brown,
[2006] OJ No 5276 (ONCA), 2006 CanLII 60340 (ON CA), per curiam
admitted
R v Morin,
[2005] OJ No 4402 (ONCA), 2005 CanLII 37252 (ON CA), per curiam
admitted
R v W(S),
[2004] OJ No 4164 (ONCA)(*no CanLII links)
admitted
R v Grabowski,
2004 BCSC 328 (CanLII), per Bennett J
admitted 5 instances of arson in the same geographical area within 2 hours.
R v Stewart,
2004 BCCA 56 (CanLII), per Hall JA
admitted The accused was a doctor accused of touching female patients. He claimed the touching was accidental.
R v Blake (2003),
2003 CanLII 13682 (ON CA), 181 CCC (3d) 169 (Ont. C.A.), per Simmons JA (2:1) aff'd 2004 SCC 69 (CanLII), per curiam
rejected The evidence consisted of prior touching of children aged 10 years or under on two occasions in the past. Both prior incidents involved genital touching and occurred in private. The accused told one of the children that he was sorry and that it would not happen again. The court found the similarities lacking in detail and non-specific conduct.
R v Shearing,
[2002] 3 SCR 33, 2002 SCC 58 (CanLII), per Binnie J
R v KW,
1996 CanLII 396 (ON CA), per curiam
not admitted The accused was charged with two counts of sexual assault in relation to two complainants. Few facts are given by Court of Appeal. Judge admitted the similar fact evidence. Court of Appeal disagreed and found it as "insufficiently similar".