Regulatory Motor Vehicle Offences: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
'''Onus and Standard of Proof'''<Br>
'''Onus and Standard of Proof'''<Br>
The standard of proof is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt".<Ref>
The standard of proof is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt".<Ref>
R v Beauchamp, [1953] OR 422-434 (ONCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/g1jf8 1952 CanLII 60] (ON CA)<Br>
R v Beauchamp, [1953] OR 422-434 (ONCA), [http://canlii.ca/t/g1jf8 1952 CanLII 60] (ON CA){{perONCA|MacKay JA}}<Br>
</ref>
</ref>


Line 17: Line 17:
==See Also==
==See Also==
* [http://prosecutors.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/2014-NFC-Careless_Driving_PAO_Fall_2014.ppt Ontario Prosecutor Presentation]
* [http://prosecutors.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/2014-NFC-Careless_Driving_PAO_Fall_2014.ppt Ontario Prosecutor Presentation]
[[Category:Offences]]

Revision as of 14:29, 18 December 2018

Careless Driving

All provinces have some form of motor vehicle offence relating to careless driving.[1]

Onus and Standard of Proof
The standard of proof is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt".[2]

Proving careless driving will usually require:

  1. the accused drove in a manner prohibited by the section
    1. the accused drove without "due care and attention"
  1. ON: s. 130 (careless driving) Highway Traffic Act
  2. R v Beauchamp, [1953] OR 422-434 (ONCA), 1952 CanLII 60 (ON CA), per MacKay JA

See Also