Sources of Criminal Law: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Constitutionally, criminal law in its simplest form is a "prohibited" act with "penal consequences".<Ref>
Constitutionally, criminal law in its simplest form is a "prohibited" act with "penal consequences".<Ref>
Proprietary Articles Trade Association v Attorney General of Canada, [1931] A.C. 310 at p.324 per Lord Atkin <br>
Proprietary Articles Trade Association v Attorney General of Canada, [1931] A.C. 310 at p.324 per Lord Atkin <br>
Reference re Firearms Act (Can.), [2000] 1 SCR 783, [http://canlii.ca/t/5251 2000 SCC 31] (CanLII)<br>
Reference re Firearms Act (Can.), [2000] 1 SCR 783, [http://canlii.ca/t/5251 2000 SCC 31] (CanLII){{perSCC| J}}<br>
</ref> Jurisprudence mandated a further requirement that there be a criminal "public purpose"<ref>
</ref> Jurisprudence mandated a further requirement that there be a criminal "public purpose"<ref>
Margarine Reference, [1949] SCR 1, [http://canlii.ca/t/1nmzn 1948 CanLII 2] (SCC) at p. 50</ref>, which includes goals such as "public peace, order, security, health" and "morality".<ref>
Margarine Reference, [1949] SCR 1, [http://canlii.ca/t/1nmzn 1948 CanLII 2] (SCC){{perSCC| J}} at p. 50</ref>, which includes goals such as "public peace, order, security, health" and "morality".<ref>
Margarine Reference{{ibid}}<br>
Margarine Reference{{ibid}}<br>
Reference re Firearms Act{{supra}} at para 27</ref>
Reference re Firearms Act{{supra}} at para 27</ref>


It is said to only apply to conduct that "is so inconsistent with the shared morality of society so as to warrant public condemnation and punishment".<Ref>
It is said to only apply to conduct that "is so inconsistent with the shared morality of society so as to warrant public condemnation and punishment".<Ref>
R v Greenwood, [http://canlii.ca/t/1p78s 1991 CanLII 2730] (ON CA)<br>
R v Greenwood, [http://canlii.ca/t/1p78s 1991 CanLII 2730] (ON CA){{perONCA| JA}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Line 18: Line 18:


There is no necessary requirement that criminal law be for the purpose of harm prevention.<Ref>
There is no necessary requirement that criminal law be for the purpose of harm prevention.<Ref>
R v Malmo-Levine, [2003] 3 SCR 571, [http://canlii.ca/t/1gbdn 2003 SCC 74] (CanLII)</ref>
R v Malmo-Levine, [2003] 3 SCR 571, [http://canlii.ca/t/1gbdn 2003 SCC 74] (CanLII){{perSCC| J}}</ref>


It is suggested that the purpose of criminal law is to preserve the well being and general order of society.<ref>
It is suggested that the purpose of criminal law is to preserve the well being and general order of society.<ref>
Line 24: Line 24:
</ref>
</ref>
It is to protect the public.<ref>
It is to protect the public.<ref>
R v B.(S.J.), [http://canlii.ca/t/5k1v 2002 ABCA 143] (CanLII) at para 65
R v B.(S.J.), [http://canlii.ca/t/5k1v 2002 ABCA 143] (CanLII){{perABCA| JA}} at para 65
</ref>
</ref>


One of primary concerns of the proper functioning of the system is toe ensure that "the innocent must not be convicted".<ref>
One of primary concerns of the proper functioning of the system is toe ensure that "the innocent must not be convicted".<ref>
R v Mills, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fqkl 1999 CanLII 637] (SCC), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 668 at para 71<br>
R v Mills, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fqkl 1999 CanLII 637] (SCC), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 668{{perSCC| J}} at para 71<br>
R v Leipert, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fr41 1997 CanLII 367] (SCC), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 281 at para 24<br>
R v Leipert, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fr41 1997 CanLII 367] (SCC), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 281{{perSCC| J}} at para 24<br>
</ref>
</ref>


One of the essential requirements for a properly functioning justice system is that it must have "public confidence", which is necessary for the integrity of the rule of law.<ref>
One of the essential requirements for a properly functioning justice system is that it must have "public confidence", which is necessary for the integrity of the rule of law.<ref>
R v Hall, [http://canlii.ca/t/51rq 2002 SCC 64] ("Public confidence is essential to the proper functioning of ... the justice system as a whole... Indeed, public confidence and the integrity of the rule of law are inextricably intertwined.")  
R v Hall, [http://canlii.ca/t/51rq 2002 SCC 64] (CanLII){{perSCC| J}} ("Public confidence is essential to the proper functioning of ... the justice system as a whole... Indeed, public confidence and the integrity of the rule of law are inextricably intertwined.")  
</reF>
</reF>


Line 40: Line 40:
==Source of Criminal Law==
==Source of Criminal Law==
The Parliament of Canada has the sole power to enact criminal prohibitions and determine their punishments.<ref>
The Parliament of Canada has the sole power to enact criminal prohibitions and determine their punishments.<ref>
R v Lloyd, [http://canlii.ca/t/gpg9t 2016 SCC 13] (CanLII) at para 1
R v Lloyd, [http://canlii.ca/t/gpg9t 2016 SCC 13] (CanLII){{perSCC| J}} at para 1
</ref>
</ref>


Line 51: Line 51:


The federal power over criminal law includes the power to create substantive law relating to crimes.<ref>
The federal power over criminal law includes the power to create substantive law relating to crimes.<ref>
Reference Re Young Offenders Act (PEI), [http://canlii.ca/t/1fsnh 1990 CanLII 19] (SCC), [1991] 1 SCR 252
Reference Re Young Offenders Act (PEI), [http://canlii.ca/t/1fsnh 1990 CanLII 19] (SCC), [1991] 1 SCR 252{{perSCC| J}}
</ref>
</ref>
It also empowers the federal government to grant jurisdiction to specific courts, including those constituted by the provinces, over certain offences.<ref>
It also empowers the federal government to grant jurisdiction to specific courts, including those constituted by the provinces, over certain offences.<ref>
Line 61: Line 61:
===Common Law===
===Common Law===
Section 9 of the Criminal Code provides that there can be no common law criminal offences.<ref>
Section 9 of the Criminal Code provides that there can be no common law criminal offences.<ref>
see also R v Amato,  [1982] 2 SCR 418, [http://canlii.ca/t/1lpcs 1982 CanLII 31] (SCC) </ref> However, under s. 8 common law defences have a role in criminal law.<ref> See [http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec8 s. 8] and Levis (City) v Tétrault, [http://canlii.ca/t/1n0zk 2006 SCC 12] (CanLII)<br>
see also R v Amato,  [1982] 2 SCR 418, [http://canlii.ca/t/1lpcs 1982 CanLII 31] (SCC){{perSCC| J}} </ref> However, under s. 8 common law defences have a role in criminal law.<ref> See [http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2#sec8 s. 8] and Levis (City) v Tétrault, [http://canlii.ca/t/1n0zk 2006 SCC 12] (CanLII){{perSCC| J}}<br>
Frey v Fedoruk et al., [1950] SCR 517, [http://canlii.ca/t/21v52 1950 CanLII 24] (SCC)<br>
Frey v Fedoruk et al., [1950] SCR 517, [http://canlii.ca/t/21v52 1950 CanLII 24] (SCC){{perSCC| J}}<br>
Amato{{supra}}<br>
Amato{{supra}}<br>
Note that s. 8(2) permits the English criminal law as it was immediately before April 1, 1955 to still apply</ref>
Note that s. 8(2) permits the English criminal law as it was immediately before April 1, 1955 to still apply</ref>
Line 81: Line 81:
'''Equity Has No Status in Criminal Law'''<br>
'''Equity Has No Status in Criminal Law'''<br>
The principles of the laws of equity have no relevance to criminal law.<Ref>
The principles of the laws of equity have no relevance to criminal law.<Ref>
R v Steinkey, [http://canlii.ca/t/h4930 2017 ABQB 378] (CanLII), at para 33<br>
R v Steinkey, [http://canlii.ca/t/h4930 2017 ABQB 378] (CanLII){{perABQB| J}}, at para 33<br>
</ref>
</ref>


Revision as of 11:35, 24 December 2018

What is Criminal Law

Constitutionally, criminal law in its simplest form is a "prohibited" act with "penal consequences".[1] Jurisprudence mandated a further requirement that there be a criminal "public purpose"[2], which includes goals such as "public peace, order, security, health" and "morality".[3]

It is said to only apply to conduct that "is so inconsistent with the shared morality of society so as to warrant public condemnation and punishment".[4]

Acts that are considered "innocent or morally neutral" should not be included.[5]

There is no necessary requirement that criminal law be for the purpose of harm prevention.[6]

It is suggested that the purpose of criminal law is to preserve the well being and general order of society.[7] It is to protect the public.[8]

One of primary concerns of the proper functioning of the system is toe ensure that "the innocent must not be convicted".[9]

One of the essential requirements for a properly functioning justice system is that it must have "public confidence", which is necessary for the integrity of the rule of law.[10]

  1. ↑ Proprietary Articles Trade Association v Attorney General of Canada, [1931] A.C. 310 at p.324 per Lord Atkin
    Reference re Firearms Act (Can.), [2000] 1 SCR 783, 2000 SCC 31 (CanLII), per J
  2. ↑ Margarine Reference, [1949] SCR 1, 1948 CanLII 2 (SCC), per J at p. 50
  3. ↑ Margarine Reference, ibid.
    Reference re Firearms Act, supra at para 27
  4. ↑ R v Greenwood, 1991 CanLII 2730 (ON CA), per JA
  5. ↑ Greenwood, ibid.
  6. ↑ R v Malmo-Levine, [2003] 3 SCR 571, 2003 SCC 74 (CanLII), per J
  7. ↑ R v Chisholm, (1985), 18 CCC (3d) 518, 1985 CanLII 3587 (NS CA), per Macdonald JA at p. 531
  8. ↑ R v B.(S.J.), 2002 ABCA 143 (CanLII), per JA at para 65
  9. ↑ R v Mills, 1999 CanLII 637 (SCC), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 668, per J at para 71
    R v Leipert, 1997 CanLII 367 (SCC), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 281, per J at para 24
  10. ↑ R v Hall, 2002 SCC 64 (CanLII), per J ("Public confidence is essential to the proper functioning of ... the justice system as a whole... Indeed, public confidence and the integrity of the rule of law are inextricably intertwined.")

Source of Criminal Law

The Parliament of Canada has the sole power to enact criminal prohibitions and determine their punishments.[1]

  1. ↑ R v Lloyd, 2016 SCC 13 (CanLII), per J at para 1

Constitutional Authority to Create Law

The Constitution Act, 1867 sets out the divisions of powers between the federal and provincial governments. Section 91(27) bestows the authority upon the federal government to create legislation in relation to criminal law.[1] However, when it comes to matters relating to the investigation and prosecution of criminal offences, s. 92(14) bestows authority upon the provincial government to administer.[2] This power permits the provinces to constitute provincial and territorial courts which are created by the provincial court act or equivalent.

The federal power over criminal law includes the power to create substantive law relating to crimes.[3] It also empowers the federal government to grant jurisdiction to specific courts, including those constituted by the provinces, over certain offences.[4]

  1. ↑ More specifically, in relation to "the criminal law, except the constitution of courts of criminal jurisdiction, but including the procedure in criminal matters."
  2. ↑ s. 92(14) authorizes the province to makes laws in relation to "the administration of justice in the province, including the constitution, maintenance, and organization of provincial courts, both of civil and of criminal jurisdiction, and including procedure in civil matters in those courts."
    see also exception in wording of 91(27)
  3. ↑ Reference Re Young Offenders Act (PEI), 1990 CanLII 19 (SCC), [1991] 1 SCR 252, per J
  4. ↑ References Re Young Offenders Act (PEI), ibid.

Common Law

Section 9 of the Criminal Code provides that there can be no common law criminal offences.[1] However, under s. 8 common law defences have a role in criminal law.[2]

8 ...
Common law principles continued
(3) Every rule and principle of the common law that renders any circumstance a justification or excuse for an act or a defence to a charge continues in force and applies in respect of proceedings for an offence under this Act or any other Act of Parliament except in so far as they are altered by or are inconsistent with this Act or any other Act of Parliament.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 8; 1993, c. 28, s. 78; 2002, c. 7, s. 138.


– CCC

Section 11(g) of the Charter provides that no person can be found guilty of an offence other than those that constitute an offence under Canadian law or international law.[3]

Equity Has No Status in Criminal Law
The principles of the laws of equity have no relevance to criminal law.[4]

Criminal Legislation

All criminal offences are created by statute of Parliament. Most are found within the Criminal Code of Canada, with additional criminal offences in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and several others.

  1. ↑ see also R v Amato, [1982] 2 SCR 418, 1982 CanLII 31 (SCC), per J
  2. ↑ See s. 8 and Levis (City) v Tétrault, 2006 SCC 12 (CanLII), per J
    Frey v Fedoruk et al., [1950] SCR 517, 1950 CanLII 24 (SCC), per J
    Amato, supra
    Note that s. 8(2) permits the English criminal law as it was immediately before April 1, 1955 to still apply
  3. ↑ See section 11(g) of the Charter
  4. ↑ R v Steinkey, 2017 ABQB 378 (CanLII), per J, at para 33

Law Must Comply with Charter Rights

Criminal law is only valid where it complies with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Offences that are in violation of the Charter or criminal procedures that violate the Charter cannot be enforced.

Rules of evidence and procedure in criminal matters are governed by federal law under s. 91(27). Accordingly, criminal courts must apply the Canada Evidence Act and enact rules of court pursuant to the Criminal Code.[1]

  1. ↑ for example see s. 482(1) and (2)
    see also Role of Trial Judge and Case Management

Laws of England

8
...
Application of criminal law of England
(2) The criminal law of England that was in force in a province immediately before April 1, 1955 continues in force in the province except as altered, varied, modified or affected by this Act or any other Act of the Parliament of Canada.
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 8; 1993, c. 28, s. 78; 2002, c. 7, s. 138.


– CCC

Criminal offences to be under law of Canada
9 Notwithstanding anything in this Act or any other Act, no person shall be convicted or discharged under section 730

(a) of an offence at common law,
(b) of an offence under an Act of the Parliament of England, or of Great Britain, or of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, or
(c) of an offence under an Act or ordinance in force in any province, territory or place before that province, territory or place became a province of Canada,

but nothing in this section affects the power, jurisdiction or authority that a court, judge, justice or provincial court judge had, immediately before April 1, 1955, to impose punishment for contempt of court. R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 9; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 6, c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 18(F); 1995, c. 22, s. 10.


– CCC

See Also

Retrieved from "https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php?title=Sources_of_Criminal_Law&oldid=11937"