Kienapple (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "perSCC| " to "perSCC|"
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
| R v Ramage,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bkq5 2010 ONCA 488] (CanLII){{perONCA|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
| R v Ramage,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bkq5 2010 ONCA 488] (CanLII){{perONCA|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
|-
|-
| John v The Queen,<br> [1985] 2 SCR 476, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftxp 1985 CanLII 15] (SCC){{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}||  
|John v The Queen,<br> [1985] 2 SCR 476, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftxp 1985 CanLII 15] (SCC){{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}||  
|-
|-
| R v Davis,<br>[1999] 3 SCR 759, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fql7 1999 CanLII 638] (SCC){{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}||
| R v Davis,<br>[1999] 3 SCR 759, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fql7 1999 CanLII 638] (SCC){{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}||

Revision as of 22:04, 6 January 2019

Kienapple

See also: Kienapple Principle
Case Name Summary
R v Hope,
2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII), per Stack J
sexual assault and sexual interference
R v Ramage,
2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII), per Doherty JA
Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
John v The Queen,
[1985] 2 SCR 476, 1985 CanLII 15 (SCC), per Estey and Lamer JJ
R v Davis,
[1999] 3 SCR 759, 1999 CanLII 638 (SCC), per Lamer CJ
R v Prince,
[1986] 2 SCR 480, 1986 CanLII 40 (SCC), per Dickson CJ
R v Pringle,
[1989] 1 SCR 1645, 1989 CanLII 65 (SCC), per Lamer J
R v Wigman,
[1987] 1 SCR 246, 1985 CanLII 1 (SCC), per curiam