Business Records: Difference between revisions
m 1 revision imported |
m Text replacement - "R v ([A-Z])\.([A-Z])\.," to "''R v $1$2''," Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
==Case Digests== | ==Case Digests== | ||
* R v | * ''R v CM'', [http://canlii.ca/t/frn13 2012 ABPC 139] (CanLII) - phone bill and text messages admissible for truth on short notice. | ||
* R v Oster, [http://canlii.ca/t/fvzsm 2013 ONCJ 38] (CanLII) - IP address provided by a website administrator is admissible as business record under s. 30 CEA | * R v Oster, [http://canlii.ca/t/fvzsm 2013 ONCJ 38] (CanLII) - IP address provided by a website administrator is admissible as business record under s. 30 CEA | ||
* R v Vader, [http://canlii.ca/t/gs01w 2016 ABQB 287] (CanLII) - text messages on cell phone admitted for truth of its contents. | * R v Vader, [http://canlii.ca/t/gs01w 2016 ABQB 287] (CanLII) - text messages on cell phone admitted for truth of its contents. | ||
Revision as of 17:26, 12 January 2019
General Principles
There are two methods of admitting business records into evidence: