Adjournments (Cases): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1''," |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| R v Kandola and Johal, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs0h9 2012 BCSC 1012] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Romilly J}} || adjournment for pre-sentence report denied | | R v Kandola and Johal, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs0h9 2012 BCSC 1012] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Romilly J}} || adjournment for pre-sentence report denied | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Sanborn, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqcmp 2012 BCPC 41] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Skilnick J}} || crown not opposed -- adjournment denied | | ''R v Sanborn'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqcmp 2012 BCPC 41] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Skilnick J}} || crown not opposed -- adjournment denied | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Downey, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpf09 2011 ABQB 805] (CanLII){{perABQB|Tilleman J}} ||failure to grant an adjournment for a self-rep overturned | | ''R v Downey'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpf09 2011 ABQB 805] (CanLII){{perABQB|Tilleman J}} ||failure to grant an adjournment for a self-rep overturned | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Cole, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2bgp3 2010 NSCA 59] (CanLII){{TheCourtNSCA}} || crown adjournment of trial refused | | ''R v Cole'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2bgp3 2010 NSCA 59] (CanLII){{TheCourtNSCA}} || crown adjournment of trial refused | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Marshall,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/22jrb 2009 NSPC 6] (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} || Trial adjournment granted | | ''R v Marshall'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/22jrb 2009 NSPC 6] (CanLII){{perNSPC|Tax J}} || Trial adjournment granted | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Oliver and Morrison, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1jspp 2005 CanLII 3582] (2005) 194 CCC (3d) 92 (Ont. CA){{perONCA|Doherty JA}}|| | | R v Oliver and Morrison, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1jspp 2005 CanLII 3582] (2005) 194 CCC (3d) 92 (Ont. CA){{perONCA|Doherty JA}}|| | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| R v Brundia <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1tc1g 2007 ONCA 725] (CanLII){{TheCourtONCA}} || | | R v Brundia <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1tc1g 2007 ONCA 725] (CanLII){{TheCourtONCA}} || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Roebuck, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5mh4 2001 ABQB 111] (CanLII){{perABQB|Lee J}}|| | | ''R v Roebuck'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5mh4 2001 ABQB 111] (CanLII){{perABQB|Lee J}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Nichols, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1ffww 2001 CanLII 5680] (ON C.A.){{perONCA|Laskin JA}} || refusal of adjournment mid-trial for firing counsel | | ''R v Nichols'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1ffww 2001 CanLII 5680] (ON C.A.){{perONCA|Laskin JA}} || refusal of adjournment mid-trial for firing counsel | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v J.E.B. <br> (1989), [http://canlii.ca/t/1zg4q 1989 CanLII 1495] (NS CA), 52 CCC 224 (NSCA)|| | | R v J.E.B. <br> (1989), [http://canlii.ca/t/1zg4q 1989 CanLII 1495] (NS CA), 52 CCC 224 (NSCA)|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Smith, <br>(1989), 52 CCC (3d) 90 (Ont. C.A.), [http://canlii.ca/t/gb20m 1989 CanLII 7222] (ON CA){{perNSCA|R MacDonald JA}}|| | | ''R v Smith'', <br>(1989), 52 CCC (3d) 90 (Ont. C.A.), [http://canlii.ca/t/gb20m 1989 CanLII 7222] (ON CA){{perNSCA|R MacDonald JA}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Manhas, <br>[1980] 1 SCR 591 [http://canlii.ca/t/1z46h 1980 CanLII 72] (SCC){{perSCC|Martland J}} || | | ''R v Manhas'', <br>[1980] 1 SCR 591 [http://canlii.ca/t/1z46h 1980 CanLII 72] (SCC){{perSCC|Martland J}} || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Barrette,<br> [1977] 2 SCR 121, [http://canlii.ca/t/1z6cp 1976 CanLII 80] (SCC){{perSCC|Pigeon J}} || | | Barrette,<br> [1977] 2 SCR 121, [http://canlii.ca/t/1z6cp 1976 CanLII 80] (SCC){{perSCC|Pigeon J}} || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Spataro, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1twvw 1972 CanLII 25] (SCC), [1974] SCR 253{{perSCC|Judson J}}|| | | ''R v Spataro'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1twvw 1972 CanLII 25] (SCC), [1974] SCR 253{{perSCC|Judson J}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Warren <br>(1973), 14 CCC 188 {{NOCANLII}}|| | | R v Warren <br>(1973), 14 CCC 188 {{NOCANLII}}|| | ||
Revision as of 21:21, 12 January 2019
Case Digests
| Case Name | Summary |
|---|---|
| R v Kandola and Johal, 2012 BCSC 1012 (CanLII), per Romilly J |
adjournment for pre-sentence report denied |
| R v Sanborn, 2012 BCPC 41 (CanLII), per Skilnick J |
crown not opposed -- adjournment denied |
| R v Downey, 2011 ABQB 805 (CanLII), per Tilleman J |
failure to grant an adjournment for a self-rep overturned |
| R v Cole, 2010 NSCA 59 (CanLII), per curiam |
crown adjournment of trial refused |
| R v Marshall, 2009 NSPC 6 (CanLII), per Tax J |
Trial adjournment granted |
| R v Oliver and Morrison, 2005 CanLII 3582 (2005) 194 CCC (3d) 92 (Ont. CA), per Doherty JA |
|
| R v Brundia 2007 ONCA 725 (CanLII), per curiam |
|
| R v Roebuck, 2001 ABQB 111 (CanLII), per Lee J |
|
| R v Nichols, 2001 CanLII 5680 (ON C.A.), per Laskin JA |
refusal of adjournment mid-trial for firing counsel |
| R v J.E.B. (1989), 1989 CanLII 1495 (NS CA), 52 CCC 224 (NSCA) |
|
| R v Smith, (1989), 52 CCC (3d) 90 (Ont. C.A.), 1989 CanLII 7222 (ON CA), per R MacDonald JA |
|
| R v Manhas, [1980] 1 SCR 591 1980 CanLII 72 (SCC), per Martland J |
|
| Barrette, [1977] 2 SCR 121, 1976 CanLII 80 (SCC), per Pigeon J |
|
| R v Spataro, 1972 CanLII 25 (SCC), [1974] SCR 253, per Judson J |
|
| R v Warren (1973), 14 CCC 188 (*no CanLII links) |
|
| Darville v The Queen (1956), 1956), 116 CCC 113, 25 C.R. 1, 1956 CanLII 463 (SCC), per Taschereau J |