Guilty Pleas (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "([A-Z][a-z]+ v R)," to "''$1''," |
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z][A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1''," |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
{{TCase|R v Maniaol, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/274zc 2009 ABPC 390] (CanLII){{perABPC|Allen J}} || granted ||withdraw permitted due to misapprehension on admission of intent. Accused believed he was admitting willful blindness in intent when plea required actual intent.(see R v Maniaol, 2009 ABPC 390 at para 23) }} | {{TCase|R v Maniaol, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/274zc 2009 ABPC 390] (CanLII){{perABPC|Allen J}} || granted ||withdraw permitted due to misapprehension on admission of intent. Accused believed he was admitting willful blindness in intent when plea required actual intent.(see R v Maniaol, 2009 ABPC 390 at para 23) }} | ||
{{TCase|R v McCollum, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1ww90 2008 NSCA 36] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Bateman JA}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v McCollum'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1ww90 2008 NSCA 36] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Bateman JA}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|''R v DWS'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/21qz6 2008 BCCA 453] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bauman JA}} | upheld| }} | {{TCase|''R v DWS'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/21qz6 2008 BCCA 453] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bauman JA}} | upheld| }} | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
{{TCase|R v Gold, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1gvkw 2004 BCCA 179] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} | | }} | {{TCase|R v Gold, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1gvkw 2004 BCCA 179] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v McIntosh, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1gmn0 2004 NSCA 19] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Hamilton JA}} | | }} | {{TCase|''R v McIntosh'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1gmn0 2004 NSCA 19] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Hamilton JA}} | | }} | ||
{{TCase|R v Barry, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1jfdz 2004 NSCA 145] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Bateman JA}} | | }} | {{TCase|R v Barry, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1jfdz 2004 NSCA 145] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Bateman JA}} | | }} | ||
Revision as of 04:01, 13 January 2019
Withdraw of Guilty Plea
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Granados, 2017 MBQB 69 (CanLII), per Menzies J |
Granted | The judge found that the plea was not fully informed of consequences of the plea. |
| R v Fiske, 2014 SKQB 152 (CanLII), per Konkin J |
Granted | |
| R v Meadus, [2014 ONCA 445] (CanLII), per curiam |
Denied | charged with sexual interference. |
| R v Gililov, 2014 ONCJ 94 (CanLII), per Bourque J |
Denied | |
| R v Dupin, 2013 SKPC 119 (CanLII), per Cardinal J |
Denied | Charged with drug trafficking. Plead guilty with counsel in open court. Judge did not confirm elements of plea, no facts were read. |
| McLaughlin v R, 2013 NBCA 28 (CanLII), per curiam |
denied | |
| R v Wiebe, 2012 BCCA 519 (CanLII), per Ryan JA |
denied | |
| R v Lewis, 2012 SKCA 81 (CanLII), per Jackson JA |
Granted | accused changed plea with lawyer on day of trial. He never admitted offence and appeared confused. |
| R v Williams, 2012 BCCA 314 (CanLII), per Frankel JA |
denied | |
| R v Sutton, 2012 NLCA 35 (CanLII), per Rowe JA |
Granted | |
| R v Downes, 2012 ONCJ 45 (CanLII), per Marin J |
denied | |
| R v Greenall and Collins 2011 BCPC 28 (CanLII), per Skilnick J |
withdraw denied | |
| R v Lamontagne, 2011 QCCA 1486 (CanLII), per curiam |
GP upheld | |
| R v Chisholm, 2010 ONSC 3877 (CanLII), per Mulligan J |
denied | argued that was not given an option but to plead guilty |
| R v Messervey, 2010 NSCA 55 (CanLII), per Beveridge JA |
||
| R v IBB, 2009 SKPC 76 (CanLII), per Whelan J |
detailed summary of law | |
| R v White, 2009 NSSC 313 (CanLII), per Cacchione J |
||
| R v Maniaol, 2009 ABPC 390 (CanLII), per Allen J |
granted | |
| R v McCollum, 2008 NSCA 36 (CanLII), per Bateman JA |
||
| R v DWS, 2008 BCCA 453 (CanLII), per Bauman JA |
upheld | |
| R v KDH, 2007 ABPC 264 (CanLII), per LeGrandeur J |
withdraw granted | |
| R v Leonard, 2007 SKCA 128 (CanLII), per Richards JA |
updheld | |
| R v Nevin, 2006 NSCA 72 (CanLII), per Bateman JA |
||
| R v Dodge, 2005 NSPC 24 (CanLII), per Gibson J |
guilty plea withdrawn due to false acceptance to help another (see para 22 to 25) | |
| R v Moore, 2004 BCPC 560 (CanLII), per Brecknell J |
withdraw denied | |
| R v Gold, 2004 BCCA 179 (CanLII), per Finch CJ |
||
| R v McIntosh, 2004 NSCA 19 (CanLII), per Hamilton JA |
||
| R v Barry, 2004 NSCA 145 (CanLII), per Bateman JA |
||
| R v Wetmore, 2003 ABQB 350 (CanLII), per Macklin J |
denied | |
| R v Hallam, 2003 BCPC 201 (CanLII), per Brecknell J |
withdraw denied | |
| R v Moser, 2002 CanLII 49649 (ON SC), per Hill J |
withdraw denied | |
| R v Hector, 2000 CanLII 5725 (ON CA), per Finlayson J |
upheld | |
| R v Clermont, 1996 CanLII 10244 (NS CA), (1996) NSJ 170, per Clarke CJ |
||
| R v Pottie, 1996 CanLII 5604 (NSCA), per Puglsey JA |
||
| R v Murphy, 1995 CanLII 4329, [1995] NSJ No.41, per Chipman JA |
||
| R v SK, 1995 CanLII 8926 (ON CA), per Carthy JA |
granted | |
| R v Morris, 1994 CanLII 1669 (BC CA), per Legg JA |
granted | |
| R v Porter, 1994 CanLII 4019 (NS CA), (1994) 132 NSR 107, per Puglsey JA |
||
| R v RT, 1992 CanLII 2834 (ON CA), (1992) 10 OR (3d) 514 (Ont. C.A.), per Doherty JA |
appeal dismissed | |
| R v Gautreau, 1991 CanLII 4232 (NB CA), per curiam |
dismissed | appeal of failed withdraw dismissed - plea with experienced counsel and confirmed in court |
| R v Rubenstein, 1987 CanLII 2834 (ON CA), per Zuber JA |
denied | The guilty plea made with counsel. There was a joint statement of fact submitted. Joint recommendation was rejected. |
| R v Melanson, (1983) NSJ 453(*no CanLII links) |
||
| R v Igoe, (1982) 54 NSR 113(*no CanLII links) |
||
| R v MacNeil, (1982) 51 NSR 2d 541(*no CanLII links) |