Hearsay (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "<Br>" to "<br>" |
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1''," |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Keewatin, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fvs3q 2013 ABPC 1] (CanLII){{perABPC|Sully J}}|| rejected | | ''R v Keewatin'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fvs3q 2013 ABPC 1] (CanLII){{perABPC|Sully J}}|| rejected | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Villeda, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fkpsx 2011 ABCA 85] (CanLII){{TheCourtABCA}} || complainant's 911 call admitted in evidence as res gestae hearsay dispite issues with impairment | | ''R v Villeda'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fkpsx 2011 ABCA 85] (CanLII){{TheCourtABCA}} || complainant's 911 call admitted in evidence as res gestae hearsay dispite issues with impairment | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Khan, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2drvw 2010 ONCJ 580] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Schwarzl J}} || complainant's 911 call admissible for prosecution as res gestae | | ''R v Khan'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2drvw 2010 ONCJ 580] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Schwarzl J}} || complainant's 911 call admissible for prosecution as res gestae | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Alcantara,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqvb2 2012 ABQB 219] (CanLII){{perABQB|Greckol J}} || ||prelim evidence was admitted under s. 715 | | ''R v Alcantara'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqvb2 2012 ABQB 219] (CanLII){{perABQB|Greckol J}} || ||prelim evidence was admitted under s. 715 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Beah, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fx8jd 2013 ONSC 2490] (CanLII){{perONSC|Strathy J}} || application under .715(1)(d) granted|| | | ''R v Beah'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fx8jd 2013 ONSC 2490] (CanLII){{perONSC|Strathy J}} || application under .715(1)(d) granted|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Frederickson,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fxb22 2013 BCSC 779] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Grist J}} || rejected in part|| | |''R v Frederickson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fxb22 2013 BCSC 779] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Grist J}} || rejected in part|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Clarke, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fvxcd 2013 MBQB 26] (CanLII){{perMBQB|Saull J}} || admitted || | | ''R v Clarke'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fvxcd 2013 MBQB 26] (CanLII){{perMBQB|Saull J}} || admitted || | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v House, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/ftxzg 2012 ONSC 6749] (CanLII){{perONSC|Broad J}} || rejected (agreed stmt)<br> admitted (interview)|| | |''R v House'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/ftxzg 2012 ONSC 6749] (CanLII){{perONSC|Broad J}} || rejected (agreed stmt)<br> admitted (interview)|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Serre<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frvhv 2012 ONSC 3210] (CanLII){{perONSC|Aitken J}} || admitted || guilty plea and agreed statement of facts of a co-accused are admitted only as far as it covers first-hand knowledge. | |R v Serre<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/frvhv 2012 ONSC 3210] (CanLII){{perONSC|Aitken J}} || admitted || guilty plea and agreed statement of facts of a co-accused are admitted only as far as it covers first-hand knowledge. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Deelespp,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4qnp 2002 ABPC 85] (CanLII){{perABPC|Allen J}} || admitted|| | | ''R v Deelespp'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4qnp 2002 ABPC 85] (CanLII){{perABPC|Allen J}} || admitted|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Agwa and Ojulu,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fkp4c 2011 MBPC 21] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Elliott J}} || admitted|| | | R v Agwa and Ojulu,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fkp4c 2011 MBPC 21] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Elliott J}} || admitted|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Sasakamoose,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/223vn 2008 SKPC 164] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kolenick J}} || rejected|| | | ''R v Sasakamoose'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/223vn 2008 SKPC 164] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kolenick J}} || rejected|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v EC'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1sr4m 2007 SKPC 27] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Gray J}}|||| | | ''R v EC'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1sr4m 2007 SKPC 27] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Gray J}}|||| | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| ''R v KPH'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wn82 2007 ABQB 728] (CanLII){{perABQB|Thomas J}}|||| | | ''R v KPH'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wn82 2007 ABQB 728] (CanLII){{perABQB|Thomas J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Kontzamanis,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1tggk 2007 BCSC 1603] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Dillon J}} || dismissed|| | | ''R v Kontzamanis'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1tggk 2007 BCSC 1603] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Dillon J}} || dismissed|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Williams,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1mngl 2006 NSCA 23] (CanLII), [2006] NSJ No. 63 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Oland JA}}|||| | | ''R v Williams'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1mngl 2006 NSCA 23] (CanLII), [2006] NSJ No. 63 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Oland JA}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Sigovin<br> [2006] OJ No 1967 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}||admitted|| | | R v Sigovin<br> [2006] OJ No 1967 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}||admitted|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v White, [http://canlii.ca/t/1q4pf 2006 ABQB 888] (CanLII){{perABQB|Moreau J}} || dismissed|| | | ''R v White'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1q4pf 2006 ABQB 888] (CanLII){{perABQB|Moreau J}} || dismissed|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Adam et al, [http://canlii.ca/t/1p876 2006 BCSC 1355] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Romilly J}} |||| | | R v Adam et al, [http://canlii.ca/t/1p876 2006 BCSC 1355] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Romilly J}} |||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Aronis, [http://canlii.ca/t/1jp70 2005 CanLII 2057] (ON SC), [2005] OJ No 286 (Ont. S.C.){{perONSC|Howden J}}|||| | | ''R v Aronis'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1jp70 2005 CanLII 2057] (ON SC), [2005] OJ No 286 (Ont. S.C.){{perONSC|Howden J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Beckmann, [http://canlii.ca/t/1k4j1 2005 ABQB 227] (CanLII), [2005] AJ No 385 (Alta. QB){{perABQB|Lee J}} |||| | | ''R v Beckmann'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1k4j1 2005 ABQB 227] (CanLII), [2005] AJ No 385 (Alta. QB){{perABQB|Lee J}} |||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Levesque [2004] OJ No 2528 (Ont. S.C.){{NOCANLII}}|| || | | R v Levesque [2004] OJ No 2528 (Ont. S.C.){{NOCANLII}}|| || | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
| ''R v AM'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1hsh0 2004 ONCJ 185] (CanLII), [2004] O.J. No 3770 (Ont. S.C.){{perONSC|Hackett J}}|||| | | ''R v AM'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1hsh0 2004 ONCJ 185] (CanLII), [2004] O.J. No 3770 (Ont. S.C.){{perONSC|Hackett J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Johnson, [http://canlii.ca/t/1hjwq 2004 NSCA 91] (CanLII), [2004] NSJ No. 280 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Oland JA}}|||| | | ''R v Johnson'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1hjwq 2004 NSCA 91] (CanLII), [2004] NSJ No. 280 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Oland JA}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Michaud, [http://canlii.ca/t/1h4tx 2004 CanLII 7714] (ON CA), [2004] OJ No 2098, (Ont. C.A.){{TheCourt}}|||| | | ''R v Michaud'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1h4tx 2004 CanLII 7714] (ON CA), [2004] OJ No 2098, (Ont. C.A.){{TheCourt}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v PSB'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1x6bd 2004 NSCA 25] (CanLII), [2004] NSJ No. 49 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Cromwell JA}}|||| | | ''R v PSB'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1x6bd 2004 NSCA 25] (CanLII), [2004] NSJ No. 49 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Cromwell JA}}|||| | ||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
| R v Singh [2004] OJ No 1799 (Ont. Ct. Jus){{NOCANLII}} ||admitted ||Domestic offence | | R v Singh [2004] OJ No 1799 (Ont. Ct. Jus){{NOCANLII}} ||admitted ||Domestic offence | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Scott, [http://canlii.ca/t/1jddq 2004 NSCA 141] (CanLII), [2004] NSJ No. 451 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Fichaud JA}}|||| | | ''R v Scott'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1jddq 2004 NSCA 141] (CanLII), [2004] NSJ No. 451 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Fichaud JA}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Malik, [http://canlii.ca/t/1gnbq 2004 BCSC 299] (CanLII), [2004] BCJ No. 456 (BCSC){{perBCSC|Josephson J}}|||| | | ''R v Malik'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1gnbq 2004 BCSC 299] (CanLII), [2004] BCJ No. 456 (BCSC){{perBCSC|Josephson J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Morehouse, [http://canlii.ca/t/1gfpp 2004 ABQB 97] (CanLII), [2004] AJ No 123 (Alta. Q.B.){{perABQB|Rooke J}}|||| | | ''R v Morehouse'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1gfpp 2004 ABQB 97] (CanLII), [2004] AJ No 123 (Alta. Q.B.){{perABQB|Rooke J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Strauss, [http://canlii.ca/t/1jp7d 2004 SKPC 146] (CanLII), [2004] S.J. No. 846 (Sask. Prov. Ct.){{perSKPC|Carter J}}|||| | | ''R v Strauss'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1jp7d 2004 SKPC 146] (CanLII), [2004] S.J. No. 846 (Sask. Prov. Ct.){{perSKPC|Carter J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Wodage [2004] M.J. No. 61 (Man. Prov. Ct.){{NOCANLII}}|||| | | R v Wodage [2004] M.J. No. 61 (Man. Prov. Ct.){{NOCANLII}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Prince, [http://canlii.ca/t/1hd9s 2004 BCPC 163] (CanLII), [2004] BCJ No. 1277 (BC. Prov. Ct.){{perBCPC|Brecknell J}}|||| | | ''R v Prince'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1hd9s 2004 BCPC 163] (CanLII), [2004] BCJ No. 1277 (BC. Prov. Ct.){{perBCPC|Brecknell J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Czibulka, [http://canlii.ca/t/1hsbz 2004 CanLII 22985] (ON CA), [2004] OJ No 3273 (Ont. C.A.){{perONCA|Rosenberg JA}}|||| | | ''R v Czibulka'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1hsbz 2004 CanLII 22985] (ON CA), [2004] OJ No 3273 (Ont. C.A.){{perONCA|Rosenberg JA}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Nolin, [http://canlii.ca/t/41 2003 CanLII 5923] (MB PC), [2003] M.J. No. 270 (Man. Prov. Ct.){{perMBPC|Sandhu J}}|||| | | ''R v Nolin'', [http://canlii.ca/t/41 2003 CanLII 5923] (MB PC), [2003] M.J. No. 270 (Man. Prov. Ct.){{perMBPC|Sandhu J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Wilder, [http://canlii.ca/t/1gn9x 2003 BCSC 1840] (CanLII), [2003] BCJ No. 2884{{perBCSC|Romilly J}}|||| | | ''R v Wilder'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1gn9x 2003 BCSC 1840] (CanLII), [2003] BCJ No. 2884{{perBCSC|Romilly J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Campbell, [http://canlii.ca/t/4v1j 2002 NSCA 35] (CanLII), [2002] NSJ No. 120 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Bateman JA}}|||| | | ''R v Campbell'', [http://canlii.ca/t/4v1j 2002 NSCA 35] (CanLII), [2002] NSJ No. 120 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Bateman JA}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Nazareth [2002] OJ No 4085 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}|| || | | R v Nazareth [2002] OJ No 4085 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}|| || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Nejad, [http://canlii.ca/t/5ccb 2002 BCPC 617] (CanLII), [2002] BCJ No. 3067 (B.C. Prov. Ct.){{perBCPC|Chen J}} ||statement admitted|| domestic violence -- gave different story from handwritten statement--statement consistent with 911 call and other evidence--no duress in statement, written over 45 minutes | | ''R v Nejad'', [http://canlii.ca/t/5ccb 2002 BCPC 617] (CanLII), [2002] BCJ No. 3067 (B.C. Prov. Ct.){{perBCPC|Chen J}} ||statement admitted|| domestic violence -- gave different story from handwritten statement--statement consistent with 911 call and other evidence--no duress in statement, written over 45 minutes | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v EJF'', [http://canlii.ca/t/4v2n 2001 NSCA 158] (CanLII), [2001] NSJ No. 434 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Bateman JA}}|||| | | ''R v EJF'', [http://canlii.ca/t/4v2n 2001 NSCA 158] (CanLII), [2001] NSJ No. 434 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Bateman JA}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Oakley, [http://canlii.ca/t/5fcd 2001 NSPC 36] (CanLII), [2001] NSJ No. 537 (NS Prov. Ct.){{perNSPC|C Williams J}}|||| | | ''R v Oakley'', [http://canlii.ca/t/5fcd 2001 NSPC 36] (CanLII), [2001] NSJ No. 537 (NS Prov. Ct.){{perNSPC|C Williams J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Pennell, [http://canlii.ca/t/4v28 2001 NSPC 12] (CanLII), [2001] NSJ No. 211(NS Prov. Ct.){{perNSPC|C Williams J}}|||| | | ''R v Pennell'', [http://canlii.ca/t/4v28 2001 NSPC 12] (CanLII), [2001] NSJ No. 211(NS Prov. Ct.){{perNSPC|C Williams J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Nguyen, [http://canlii.ca/t/5rkq 2001 ABCA 98] (CanLII), [2001] AJ No 513 (Alta. C.A.){{TheCourtABCA}}|||| | | ''R v Nguyen'', [http://canlii.ca/t/5rkq 2001 ABCA 98] (CanLII), [2001] AJ No 513 (Alta. C.A.){{TheCourtABCA}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Glowatski, [http://canlii.ca/t/4z3x 2001 BCCA 678] (CanLII), [2001] BCJ No. 2499 (BCCA){{perBCCA|Hall JA}}|||| | | ''R v Glowatski'', [http://canlii.ca/t/4z3x 2001 BCCA 678] (CanLII), [2001] BCJ No. 2499 (BCCA){{perBCCA|Hall JA}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Auger, [http://canlii.ca/t/5brp 2001 NWTSC 30] (CanLII), [2001] N.W.T.J. No. 45 (NWT Sup. Ct.){{perNWTSC|Schuler J}}|||| | | ''R v Auger'', [http://canlii.ca/t/5brp 2001 NWTSC 30] (CanLII), [2001] N.W.T.J. No. 45 (NWT Sup. Ct.){{perNWTSC|Schuler J}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Morrissey [2001] OJ No 498 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}|||| | | R v Morrissey [2001] OJ No 498 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}|||| | ||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
| R v J.M. [2001] OJ No 1748 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}|||| | | R v J.M. [2001] OJ No 1748 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Lavallee, [http://canlii.ca/t/1l7p6 2000 CanLII 19585] (SK PC), [2000] S.J. No. 43 (Sask. Prov. Ct.){{perSKPC|Ebert J}} |||| | | ''R v Lavallee'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1l7p6 2000 CanLII 19585] (SK PC), [2000] S.J. No. 43 (Sask. Prov. Ct.){{perSKPC|Ebert J}} |||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Diu, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fb7m 2000 CanLII 4535] (ON CA), [2000] OJ No 1770 (Ont. C.A.){{perONCA|Sharpe JA}}|||| | | ''R v Diu'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1fb7m 2000 CanLII 4535] (ON CA), [2000] OJ No 1770 (Ont. C.A.){{perONCA|Sharpe JA}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Deschenes [2000] OJ No 4658 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}|||| | | R v Deschenes [2000] OJ No 4658 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}|||| | ||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
| R v Duong [1999] OJ No 1651 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}|||| | | R v Duong [1999] OJ No 1651 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Merz, [http://canlii.ca/t/1f9tv 1999 CanLII 1647] (ON CA), (1999) 140 CCC (3d) 259 (Ont. C.A.){{perONCA|Doherty JA}}|||| | | ''R v Merz'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1f9tv 1999 CanLII 1647] (ON CA), (1999) 140 CCC (3d) 259 (Ont. C.A.){{perONCA|Doherty JA}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Bartlett [1999] OJ No 3313 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}||statement admitted ||domestic offence--statement given within an hour of incident, detailed and signed--witness agreed contents were reliable to what was said-- | | R v Bartlett [1999] OJ No 3313 (Ont. Ct. Jus.){{NOCANLII}}||statement admitted ||domestic offence--statement given within an hour of incident, detailed and signed--witness agreed contents were reliable to what was said-- | ||
Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
| R v S.H. [1998] O.J. No 613 (Ont. Prov. Ct.){{NOCANLII}}|| || | | R v S.H. [1998] O.J. No 613 (Ont. Prov. Ct.){{NOCANLII}}|| || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Fraser, [http://canlii.ca/t/1gmp9 1997 CanLII 2562] (NS SC), [1997] NSJ No. 541 (NSSC){{perNSSC|Carver J}}|| || | | ''R v Fraser'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1gmp9 1997 CanLII 2562] (NS SC), [1997] NSJ No. 541 (NSSC){{perNSSC|Carver J}}|| || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Conway, [http://canlii.ca/t/4rfx 1997 CanLII 2726] (ON CA), (1997) 121 CCC (3d) 397 (Ont C.A.){{perONCA|Labrosse JA}}|| || | | ''R v Conway'', [http://canlii.ca/t/4rfx 1997 CanLII 2726] (ON CA), (1997) 121 CCC (3d) 397 (Ont C.A.){{perONCA|Labrosse JA}}|| || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v O’Keefe [1997] N.J. No. 314 (Nfld. Prov. Ct.){{NOCANLII}}|| || | | R v O’Keefe [1997] N.J. No. 314 (Nfld. Prov. Ct.){{NOCANLII}}|| || | ||
Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
| R v Leopold [1996] NSJ No. 544 (NS Prov. Ct){{NOCANLII}}|| || | | R v Leopold [1996] NSJ No. 544 (NS Prov. Ct){{NOCANLII}}|| || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Pottie, [http://canlii.ca/t/1mpvm 1996 CanLII 5604] (NS CA), [1996] NSJ No. 138 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Puglsey JA}}|||| | | ''R v Pottie'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1mpvm 1996 CanLII 5604] (NS CA), [1996] NSJ No. 138 (NSCA){{perNSCA|Puglsey JA}}|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Collins [1996] OJ No 2881 (Ont Prov. Ct.){{NOCANLII}}||statement admitted||recanted witness | | R v Collins [1996] OJ No 2881 (Ont Prov. Ct.){{NOCANLII}}||statement admitted||recanted witness | ||
Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Chretien,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/22p4d 2009 CanLII 9390] (ON SC){{perONSC|Aitken J}} || video statement admitted for truth of contents under KGB | | ''R v Chretien'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/22p4d 2009 CanLII 9390] (ON SC){{perONSC|Aitken J}} || video statement admitted for truth of contents under KGB | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Kociuk, <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2413m 2009 MBQB 162] (CanLII){{perMBQB|Joyal ACJ}} || confession to murder by a deceased third party held admissible | | ''R v Kociuk'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2413m 2009 MBQB 162] (CanLII){{perMBQB|Joyal ACJ}} || confession to murder by a deceased third party held admissible | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v McCotter'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpvlp 2012 BCCA 54] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Ryan JA}} || statements made to co-workers before death admissible | | ''R v McCotter'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpvlp 2012 BCCA 54] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Ryan JA}} || statements made to co-workers before death admissible | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Candir,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2754x 2009 ONCA 915] (CanLII){{perONCA|Watt JA}} || admissible | | ''R v Candir'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/2754x 2009 ONCA 915] (CanLII){{perONCA|Watt JA}} || admissible | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Fairburn,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/24mpd 2009 CanLII 37714] (ONSC){{perONSC|Poupore J}} || admissible | | ''R v Fairburn'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/24mpd 2009 CanLII 37714] (ONSC){{perONSC|Poupore J}} || admissible | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Mohammed,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1s081 2007 ONCA 513] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} || admissible | | ''R v Mohammed'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1s081 2007 ONCA 513] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} || admissible | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Assoun,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n38p 2006 NSCA 47] (CanLII){{TheCourt}}|| | | ''R v Assoun'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n38p 2006 NSCA 47] (CanLII){{TheCourt}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Ackland,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1nc1j 2006 ABQB 347] (CanLII){{perABQB|Germain J}} || deceased mother's statement excluded | | ''R v Ackland'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1nc1j 2006 ABQB 347] (CanLII){{perABQB|Germain J}} || deceased mother's statement excluded | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Solic, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1lxcz 2003 ABQB 1069] (CanLII){{perABQB|Slatter J}} || deceased gave video statement; admissible | | ''R v Solic'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1lxcz 2003 ABQB 1069] (CanLII){{perABQB|Slatter J}} || deceased gave video statement; admissible | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
| R v McCormack ''et al.'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1z16w 2008 ONCJ 286] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Beatty J}} || prior written statement evidence partially admitted | | R v McCormack ''et al.'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1z16w 2008 ONCJ 286] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Beatty J}} || prior written statement evidence partially admitted | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Tomlinson, [http://canlii.ca/t/21j01 2008 CanLII 58424] (ONSC){{perONSC|Archibald J}} || oral utterance to police; inadmissible | | ''R v Tomlinson'', [http://canlii.ca/t/21j01 2008 CanLII 58424] (ONSC){{perONSC|Archibald J}} || oral utterance to police; inadmissible | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Devine, [http://canlii.ca/t/1qtfp 2007 ABCA 49] (CanLII){{TheCourtABCA}} (2:1) || girlfriend keeps changing story; ID evidence admitted | | ''R v Devine'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1qtfp 2007 ABCA 49] (CanLII){{TheCourtABCA}} (2:1) || girlfriend keeps changing story; ID evidence admitted | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Rombough, [http://canlii.ca/t/1sgk0 2006 ABPC 262] (CanLII){{perABPC|Kerby J}} || video statement admitted | | ''R v Rombough'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1sgk0 2006 ABPC 262] (CanLII){{perABPC|Kerby J}} || video statement admitted | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Nejad, [http://canlii.ca/t/1p370 2004 BCSC 1819] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Truscott J}} || statement to police admitted | | ''R v Nejad'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1p370 2004 BCSC 1819] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Truscott J}} || statement to police admitted | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Duong, [http://canlii.ca/t/6gmb 1998 CanLII 3585] (ON C.A.){{TheCourtONCA}} || reject prior testimony of co-accused placing accused at scene; witness proven liar | | ''R v Duong'', [http://canlii.ca/t/6gmb 1998 CanLII 3585] (ON C.A.){{TheCourtONCA}} || reject prior testimony of co-accused placing accused at scene; witness proven liar | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Hrynyk, [http://canlii.ca/t/4pjh 1998 ABPC 160] (CanLII){{perABPC|Ketchum J}} || under oath statement admitted | | ''R v Hrynyk'', [http://canlii.ca/t/4pjh 1998 ABPC 160] (CanLII){{perABPC|Ketchum J}} || under oath statement admitted | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
| R v Thomas (R.J.), [http://canlii.ca/t/25jsf 2009 MBCA 85] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Monnin JA}} ||"forgetful" witness gave video statement; admitted. | | R v Thomas (R.J.), [http://canlii.ca/t/25jsf 2009 MBCA 85] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Monnin JA}} ||"forgetful" witness gave video statement; admitted. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Woodard, [http://canlii.ca/t/23cvr 2009 MBCA 42] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Chartier JA}} || "forgetful" witness; prior statement admissible | | ''R v Woodard'', [http://canlii.ca/t/23cvr 2009 MBCA 42] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Chartier JA}} || "forgetful" witness; prior statement admissible | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v EC'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1sr4m 2007 SKPC 27] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Gray J}} || witness "forgets"; prior statement admissible | | ''R v EC'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1sr4m 2007 SKPC 27] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Gray J}} || witness "forgets"; prior statement admissible | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Moreau, [http://canlii.ca/t/1nbhg 2006 NUCJ 8] (CanLII){{perNUCJ|Kilpatrick J}} || prior statement not admitted | | ''R v Moreau'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1nbhg 2006 NUCJ 8] (CanLII){{perNUCJ|Kilpatrick J}} || prior statement not admitted | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Malik and Bagri, [http://canlii.ca/t/1gnbq 2004 BCSC 2004] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Josephson J}} || forgetful witness gave statement; admitted as past recollection recorded | | R v Malik and Bagri, [http://canlii.ca/t/1gnbq 2004 BCSC 2004] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Josephson J}} || forgetful witness gave statement; admitted as past recollection recorded | ||
Line 245: | Line 245: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Cansanay, [http://canlii.ca/t/23z38 2009 MBCA 59] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Monnin JA}} || gang members refuse to testify; overturn exclusion of statements | | ''R v Cansanay'', [http://canlii.ca/t/23z38 2009 MBCA 59] (CanLII){{perMBCA|Monnin JA}} || gang members refuse to testify; overturn exclusion of statements | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v U. (S.), [http://canlii.ca/t/1svv5 2007 NUCJ 20] (CanLII){{perNUCJ|Johnson J}} || statement admitted | | R v U. (S.), [http://canlii.ca/t/1svv5 2007 NUCJ 20] (CanLII){{perNUCJ|Johnson J}} || statement admitted | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Goodstoney, [http://canlii.ca/t/1jvpb 2005 ABQB 128] (CanLII){{perABQB|Rooke J}} || 2 out of 3 KGB statements rejected | | ''R v Goodstoney'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1jvpb 2005 ABQB 128] (CanLII){{perABQB|Rooke J}} || 2 out of 3 KGB statements rejected | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Scott, [http://canlii.ca/t/1jddq 2004 NSCA 141] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Fichaud JA}} || KGB statement wrongly admitted in [http://canlii.ca/t/1gmnh 2004 NSSC 13] (CanLII) | |''R v Scott'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1jddq 2004 NSCA 141] (CanLII){{perNSCA|Fichaud JA}} || KGB statement wrongly admitted in [http://canlii.ca/t/1gmnh 2004 NSSC 13] (CanLII) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Charles, [http://canlii.ca/t/1mcrn 1997 CanLII 9699] (SKCA){{perSKCA|Cameron JA}} || 3 prior statements inadmissible | | ''R v Charles'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1mcrn 1997 CanLII 9699] (SKCA){{perSKCA|Cameron JA}} || 3 prior statements inadmissible | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Disabled witness=== | ===Disabled witness=== | ||
Line 260: | Line 260: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Pearson, [http://canlii.ca/t/23263 1994 CanLII 8751] (BCCA){{perBCCA|Taylor JA}}|| | | ''R v Pearson'', [http://canlii.ca/t/23263 1994 CanLII 8751] (BCCA){{perBCCA|Taylor JA}}|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 268: | Line 268: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Weselak, [http://canlii.ca/t/1qwr2 1999 CanLII 14165] (MBQB){{perMBQB|Menzies J}} || admitted PI testimony of child | | ''R v Weselak'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1qwr2 1999 CanLII 14165] (MBQB){{perMBQB|Menzies J}} || admitted PI testimony of child | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Otherwise unavailable=== | ===Otherwise unavailable=== | ||
Line 275: | Line 275: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Clark, [http://canlii.ca/t/1z3vs 2008 ABQB 384] (CanLII){{perABQB|Lee J}} || missing witness; PI testimony admissible | | ''R v Clark'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1z3vs 2008 ABQB 384] (CanLII){{perABQB|Lee J}} || missing witness; PI testimony admissible | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Lewis, [http://canlii.ca/t/5dc1 2003 NSPC 3] (CanLII){{perNSPC|C Williams J}} || witness gave 2 statements, was available but failed to attend court; statement inadmissible | | ''R v Lewis'', [http://canlii.ca/t/5dc1 2003 NSPC 3] (CanLII){{perNSPC|C Williams J}} || witness gave 2 statements, was available but failed to attend court; statement inadmissible | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v May, [http://canlii.ca/t/frjqj 2012 BCSC 802] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Williams J}} || admissible - Preliminary Inquiry transcript | | ''R v May'', [http://canlii.ca/t/frjqj 2012 BCSC 802] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Williams J}} || admissible - Preliminary Inquiry transcript | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Confession=== | ===Confession=== | ||
Line 286: | Line 286: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Edgar, [http://canlii.ca/t/2br4d 2010 ONCA 529] (CanLII){{perONCA|Sharpe JA}} || prior statements admitted | | ''R v Edgar'', [http://canlii.ca/t/2br4d 2010 ONCA 529] (CanLII){{perONCA|Sharpe JA}} || prior statements admitted | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Misc== | ==Misc== | ||
Line 300: | Line 300: | ||
! Case Name !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Abel, [http://canlii.ca/t/fq2cl 2011 NLTD 173] (CanLII){{perNLSC|Stack J}} || hearsay evidence of murder victim reporting multiple incidents of violence to family was inadmissible under principled approach | | ''R v Abel'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fq2cl 2011 NLTD 173] (CanLII){{perNLSC|Stack J}} || hearsay evidence of murder victim reporting multiple incidents of violence to family was inadmissible under principled approach | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Pasqualino, [http://canlii.ca/t/1zg5v 2008 ONCA 554] (CanLII){{perONCA|LaForme JA}} || admitted for est. motive, intent and animus -- statement of victim reporting past physical and verbal abuse. | | ''R v Pasqualino'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1zg5v 2008 ONCA 554] (CanLII){{perONCA|LaForme JA}} || admitted for est. motive, intent and animus -- statement of victim reporting past physical and verbal abuse. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Moo, [http://canlii.ca/t/25kzl 2009 ONCA 645] (CanLII){{perONCA|Watt JA}} || statement by deceased reporting nature of relationship and marriage -- admitted for 1) motive, intent, and animus 2) rebut accused claim of unintentional killing and 3) credibility if accused testifies | | ''R v Moo'', [http://canlii.ca/t/25kzl 2009 ONCA 645] (CanLII){{perONCA|Watt JA}} || statement by deceased reporting nature of relationship and marriage -- admitted for 1) motive, intent, and animus 2) rebut accused claim of unintentional killing and 3) credibility if accused testifies | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Candir, [http://canlii.ca/t/2754x 2009 ONCA 915] (CanLII){{perONCA|Watt JA}} ||150 statements of deceased to show state of mind -- admitted for motive, animus and identity of killer and state of mind of killer (para 51) | | ''R v Candir'', [http://canlii.ca/t/2754x 2009 ONCA 915] (CanLII){{perONCA|Watt JA}} ||150 statements of deceased to show state of mind -- admitted for motive, animus and identity of killer and state of mind of killer (para 51) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Polimac, [http://canlii.ca/t/29plv 2010 ONCA 346] (CanLII){{perONCA|Doherty JA}}|| admitted to establish motive in domestic homicide | | ''R v Polimac'', [http://canlii.ca/t/29plv 2010 ONCA 346] (CanLII){{perONCA|Doherty JA}}|| admitted to establish motive in domestic homicide | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Bari, [http://canlii.ca/t/1q41l 2006 NBCA 119] (CanLII){{perNBCA|Deschênes JA}} || admissible to show victim's fear / state of mind | | ''R v Bari'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1q41l 2006 NBCA 119] (CanLII){{perNBCA|Deschênes JA}} || admissible to show victim's fear / state of mind | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Van Osselaer, [http://canlii.ca/t/58kj 2002 BCCA 464] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Hall JA}} || admissible to show nature of relationship bw accused and deceased, show motive and identity of killer, shows intent, rebut defence of accident, narrative | | R v Van Osselaer, [http://canlii.ca/t/58kj 2002 BCCA 464] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Hall JA}} || admissible to show nature of relationship bw accused and deceased, show motive and identity of killer, shows intent, rebut defence of accident, narrative | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Misir, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fn6n 2001 BCCA 202] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Proudfoot JA}} || admitted to prove intent, motive and identity, and relationship between the parties | | ''R v Misir'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1fn6n 2001 BCCA 202] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Proudfoot JA}} || admitted to prove intent, motive and identity, and relationship between the parties | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Nickerson, [http://canlii.ca/t/1h36w 1996 CanLII 3664] (NS SC), [1996] NSJ No. 342{{perNSSC|Haliburton J}} || 3 witnesses recanted, saying they forgot, were intoxicated at time, were misunderstood by police--court admitted prior statements--reliability found based on separate and corroborating statements, the witnesses understood need for truth, and it was accurately recorded | | ''R v Nickerson'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1h36w 1996 CanLII 3664] (NS SC), [1996] NSJ No. 342{{perNSSC|Haliburton J}} || 3 witnesses recanted, saying they forgot, were intoxicated at time, were misunderstood by police--court admitted prior statements--reliability found based on separate and corroborating statements, the witnesses understood need for truth, and it was accurately recorded | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 10:20, 13 January 2019
Categorical Exceptions
State of Mind
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Wysochan 1930 CanLII 483 (SK CA), (1930) 54 CCC 172 (SKCA), per Haultain CJ |
"there's a bullet in my body" -- admitted |
R v Edwards (1994), 1994 CanLII 1461 (ON CA), 91 CCC 3d 123 (ONCA), per McKinlay JA | cell phone messages suggestive of trafficking -- admitted for purpose of establishing the activities of accused and intent to respond. |
Res Gestae
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Keewatin, 2013 ABPC 1 (CanLII), per Sully J |
rejected |
R v Villeda, 2011 ABCA 85 (CanLII), per curiam |
complainant's 911 call admitted in evidence as res gestae hearsay dispite issues with impairment |
R v Khan, 2010 ONCJ 580 (CanLII), per Schwarzl J |
complainant's 911 call admissible for prosecution as res gestae |
Statutory
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Alcantara, 2012 ABQB 219 (CanLII), per Greckol J |
prelim evidence was admitted under s. 715 | |
R v Beah, 2013 ONSC 2490 (CanLII), per Strathy J |
application under .715(1)(d) granted |
Principled Exception to Hearsay
General
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Frederickson, 2013 BCSC 779 (CanLII), per Grist J |
rejected in part | |
R v Clarke, 2013 MBQB 26 (CanLII), per Saull J |
admitted | |
R v House, 2012 ONSC 6749 (CanLII), per Broad J |
rejected (agreed stmt) admitted (interview) |
|
R v Serre 2012 ONSC 3210 (CanLII), per Aitken J |
admitted | guilty plea and agreed statement of facts of a co-accused are admitted only as far as it covers first-hand knowledge. |
R v Deelespp, 2002 ABPC 85 (CanLII), per Allen J |
admitted | |
R v Agwa and Ojulu, 2011 MBPC 21 (CanLII), per Elliott J |
admitted | |
R v Sasakamoose, 2008 SKPC 164 (CanLII), per Kolenick J |
rejected | |
R v EC, 2007 SKPC 27 (CanLII), per Gray J |
||
R v KPH, 2007 ABQB 728 (CanLII), per Thomas J |
||
R v Kontzamanis, 2007 BCSC 1603 (CanLII), per Dillon J |
dismissed | |
R v Williams, 2006 NSCA 23 (CanLII), [2006] NSJ No. 63 (NSCA), per Oland JA |
||
R v Sigovin [2006] OJ No 1967 (Ont. Ct. Jus.)(*no CanLII links) |
admitted | |
R v White, 2006 ABQB 888 (CanLII), per Moreau J | dismissed | |
R v Adam et al, 2006 BCSC 1355 (CanLII), per Romilly J | ||
R v Aronis, 2005 CanLII 2057 (ON SC), [2005] OJ No 286 (Ont. S.C.), per Howden J | ||
R v Beckmann, 2005 ABQB 227 (CanLII), [2005] AJ No 385 (Alta. QB), per Lee J | ||
R v Levesque [2004] OJ No 2528 (Ont. S.C.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v AM, 2004 ONCJ 185 (CanLII), [2004] O.J. No 3770 (Ont. S.C.), per Hackett J | ||
R v Johnson, 2004 NSCA 91 (CanLII), [2004] NSJ No. 280 (NSCA), per Oland JA | ||
R v Michaud, 2004 CanLII 7714 (ON CA), [2004] OJ No 2098, (Ont. C.A.), per curiam | ||
R v PSB, 2004 NSCA 25 (CanLII), [2004] NSJ No. 49 (NSCA), per Cromwell JA | ||
R v Singh [2004] OJ No 1799 (Ont. Ct. Jus)(*no CanLII links) | admitted | Domestic offence |
R v Scott, 2004 NSCA 141 (CanLII), [2004] NSJ No. 451 (NSCA), per Fichaud JA | ||
R v Malik, 2004 BCSC 299 (CanLII), [2004] BCJ No. 456 (BCSC), per Josephson J | ||
R v Morehouse, 2004 ABQB 97 (CanLII), [2004] AJ No 123 (Alta. Q.B.), per Rooke J | ||
R v Strauss, 2004 SKPC 146 (CanLII), [2004] S.J. No. 846 (Sask. Prov. Ct.), per Carter J | ||
R v Wodage [2004] M.J. No. 61 (Man. Prov. Ct.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Prince, 2004 BCPC 163 (CanLII), [2004] BCJ No. 1277 (BC. Prov. Ct.), per Brecknell J | ||
R v Czibulka, 2004 CanLII 22985 (ON CA), [2004] OJ No 3273 (Ont. C.A.), per Rosenberg JA | ||
R v Nolin, 2003 CanLII 5923 (MB PC), [2003] M.J. No. 270 (Man. Prov. Ct.), per Sandhu J | ||
R v Wilder, 2003 BCSC 1840 (CanLII), [2003] BCJ No. 2884, per Romilly J | ||
R v Campbell, 2002 NSCA 35 (CanLII), [2002] NSJ No. 120 (NSCA), per Bateman JA | ||
R v Nazareth [2002] OJ No 4085 (Ont. Ct. Jus.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Nejad, 2002 BCPC 617 (CanLII), [2002] BCJ No. 3067 (B.C. Prov. Ct.), per Chen J | statement admitted | domestic violence -- gave different story from handwritten statement--statement consistent with 911 call and other evidence--no duress in statement, written over 45 minutes |
R v EJF, 2001 NSCA 158 (CanLII), [2001] NSJ No. 434 (NSCA), per Bateman JA | ||
R v Oakley, 2001 NSPC 36 (CanLII), [2001] NSJ No. 537 (NS Prov. Ct.), per C Williams J | ||
R v Pennell, 2001 NSPC 12 (CanLII), [2001] NSJ No. 211(NS Prov. Ct.), per C Williams J | ||
R v Nguyen, 2001 ABCA 98 (CanLII), [2001] AJ No 513 (Alta. C.A.), per curiam | ||
R v Glowatski, 2001 BCCA 678 (CanLII), [2001] BCJ No. 2499 (BCCA), per Hall JA | ||
R v Auger, 2001 NWTSC 30 (CanLII), [2001] N.W.T.J. No. 45 (NWT Sup. Ct.), per Schuler J | ||
R v Morrissey [2001] OJ No 498 (Ont. Ct. Jus.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Armstrong [2001] OJ No 2348 (Ont. Sup. Ct. Jus.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v J.M. [2001] OJ No 1748 (Ont. Ct. Jus.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Lavallee, 2000 CanLII 19585 (SK PC), [2000] S.J. No. 43 (Sask. Prov. Ct.), per Ebert J | ||
R v Diu, 2000 CanLII 4535 (ON CA), [2000] OJ No 1770 (Ont. C.A.), per Sharpe JA | ||
R v Deschenes [2000] OJ No 4658 (Ont. Ct. Jus.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v R.B. [2000] OJ No 1888 (Ont. Ct. Jus.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Schwartzenburg [2000] OJ No 2655 (Ont. S.C. Jus.)(*no CanLII links) | not admitted | domestic offence |
R v Van Osselaer, 1999 CanLII 5913 (BC SC), 1999 CanLII 6976 (BC SC), [1999] BCJ No. 3140 (BCSC), per MacAulay J | ||
R v St. Croix, 1999 CanLII 19721 (NL SCTD), [1999] N.J. 214 (Nfld. S.C.), per Barry J | ||
R v MacLeod [1999] OJ No 4325(*no CanLII links) | statement admitted | domestic offence--victim claimed at trial it was accident--not under oath or video tapted |
R v Duong [1999] OJ No 1651 (Ont. Ct. Jus.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Merz, 1999 CanLII 1647 (ON CA), (1999) 140 CCC (3d) 259 (Ont. C.A.), per Doherty JA | ||
R v Bartlett [1999] OJ No 3313 (Ont. Ct. Jus.)(*no CanLII links) | statement admitted | domestic offence--statement given within an hour of incident, detailed and signed--witness agreed contents were reliable to what was said-- |
R v S.H. [1998] O.J. No 613 (Ont. Prov. Ct.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Fraser, 1997 CanLII 2562 (NS SC), [1997] NSJ No. 541 (NSSC), per Carver J | ||
R v Conway, 1997 CanLII 2726 (ON CA), (1997) 121 CCC (3d) 397 (Ont C.A.), per Labrosse JA | ||
R v O’Keefe [1997] N.J. No. 314 (Nfld. Prov. Ct.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Chartrand [1997] M.J. No. 552 (Man. Q.B.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Mohamed [1997] OJ No 1298 (Ont. Prov. Ct.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Campbell [1997] OJ No 5837 (Ont. Prov. Ct.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v W.B. [1997] OJ No 5382 (Ont. Prov. Ct.)(*no CanLII links) | domestic assault, threats--witness gave video statement, left country--admitted statement--corroboration | |
R v Leopold [1996] NSJ No. 544 (NS Prov. Ct)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Pottie, 1996 CanLII 5604 (NS CA), [1996] NSJ No. 138 (NSCA), per Puglsey JA | ||
R v Collins [1996] OJ No 2881 (Ont Prov. Ct.)(*no CanLII links) | statement admitted | recanted witness |
R v J.K. [1996] BCJ No. 2751 (B.C.Y.C.)(*no CanLII links) | ||
R v Woycheshen [1996] M.J. No. 570 (Man. Prov. Ct.)(*no CanLII links) | statement not admitted | |
R v Smart [1995] OJ No 4182 (Ont. Prov. Ct.)(*no CanLII links) |
Deceased witness
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Chretien, 2009 CanLII 9390 (ON SC), per Aitken J |
video statement admitted for truth of contents under KGB |
R v Kociuk, 2009 MBQB 162 (CanLII), per Joyal ACJ |
confession to murder by a deceased third party held admissible |
R v McCotter, 2012 BCCA 54 (CanLII), per Ryan JA |
statements made to co-workers before death admissible |
R v Candir, 2009 ONCA 915 (CanLII), per Watt JA |
admissible |
R v Fairburn, 2009 CanLII 37714 (ONSC), per Poupore J |
admissible |
R v Mohammed, 2007 ONCA 513 (CanLII), per curiam |
admissible |
R v Assoun, 2006 NSCA 47 (CanLII), per curiam |
|
R v Ackland, 2006 ABQB 347 (CanLII), per Germain J |
deceased mother's statement excluded |
R v Solic, 2003 ABQB 1069 (CanLII), per Slatter J |
deceased gave video statement; admissible |
Recanting witness
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v CM, 2012 ABPC 102 (CanLII), per Franklin J | witness gave preliminary inquiry testimony, later said that it was all a lie--prior statement admitted |
R v McCormack et al., 2008 ONCJ 286 (CanLII), per Beatty J | prior written statement evidence partially admitted |
R v Tomlinson, 2008 CanLII 58424 (ONSC), per Archibald J | oral utterance to police; inadmissible |
R v Devine, 2007 ABCA 49 (CanLII), per curiam (2:1) | girlfriend keeps changing story; ID evidence admitted |
R v Rombough, 2006 ABPC 262 (CanLII), per Kerby J | video statement admitted |
R v Nejad, 2004 BCSC 1819 (CanLII), per Truscott J | statement to police admitted |
R v Duong, 1998 CanLII 3585 (ON C.A.), per curiam | reject prior testimony of co-accused placing accused at scene; witness proven liar |
R v Hrynyk, 1998 ABPC 160 (CanLII), per Ketchum J | under oath statement admitted |
Forgetful witnesses
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Thomas (R.J.), 2009 MBCA 85 (CanLII), per Monnin JA | "forgetful" witness gave video statement; admitted. |
R v Woodard, 2009 MBCA 42 (CanLII), per Chartier JA | "forgetful" witness; prior statement admissible |
R v EC, 2007 SKPC 27 (CanLII), per Gray J | witness "forgets"; prior statement admissible |
R v Moreau, 2006 NUCJ 8 (CanLII), per Kilpatrick J | prior statement not admitted |
R v Malik and Bagri, 2004 BCSC 2004 (CanLII), per Josephson J | forgetful witness gave statement; admitted as past recollection recorded |
Refusal to testify
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Cansanay, 2009 MBCA 59 (CanLII), per Monnin JA | gang members refuse to testify; overturn exclusion of statements |
R v U. (S.), 2007 NUCJ 20 (CanLII), per Johnson J | statement admitted |
R v Goodstoney, 2005 ABQB 128 (CanLII), per Rooke J | 2 out of 3 KGB statements rejected |
R v Scott, 2004 NSCA 141 (CanLII), per Fichaud JA | KGB statement wrongly admitted in 2004 NSSC 13 (CanLII) |
R v Charles, 1997 CanLII 9699 (SKCA), per Cameron JA | 3 prior statements inadmissible |
Disabled witness
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Pearson, 1994 CanLII 8751 (BCCA), per Taylor JA |
Youthful witness
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Weselak, 1999 CanLII 14165 (MBQB), per Menzies J | admitted PI testimony of child |
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Clark, 2008 ABQB 384 (CanLII), per Lee J | missing witness; PI testimony admissible |
R v Lewis, 2003 NSPC 3 (CanLII), per C Williams J | witness gave 2 statements, was available but failed to attend court; statement inadmissible |
R v May, 2012 BCSC 802 (CanLII), per Williams J | admissible - Preliminary Inquiry transcript |
Confession
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Edgar, 2010 ONCA 529 (CanLII), per Sharpe JA | prior statements admitted |
Misc
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Singh-Murray, 2011 NBPC 33 (CanLII), per McCarroll J | KGB statement not admissible |
Domestic Violence cases
Case Name | Summary |
---|---|
R v Abel, 2011 NLTD 173 (CanLII), per Stack J | hearsay evidence of murder victim reporting multiple incidents of violence to family was inadmissible under principled approach |
R v Pasqualino, 2008 ONCA 554 (CanLII), per LaForme JA | admitted for est. motive, intent and animus -- statement of victim reporting past physical and verbal abuse. |
R v Moo, 2009 ONCA 645 (CanLII), per Watt JA | statement by deceased reporting nature of relationship and marriage -- admitted for 1) motive, intent, and animus 2) rebut accused claim of unintentional killing and 3) credibility if accused testifies |
R v Candir, 2009 ONCA 915 (CanLII), per Watt JA | 150 statements of deceased to show state of mind -- admitted for motive, animus and identity of killer and state of mind of killer (para 51) |
R v Polimac, 2010 ONCA 346 (CanLII), per Doherty JA | admitted to establish motive in domestic homicide |
R v Bari, 2006 NBCA 119 (CanLII), per Deschênes JA | admissible to show victim's fear / state of mind |
R v Van Osselaer, 2002 BCCA 464 (CanLII), per Hall JA | admissible to show nature of relationship bw accused and deceased, show motive and identity of killer, shows intent, rebut defence of accident, narrative |
R v Misir, 2001 BCCA 202 (CanLII), per Proudfoot JA | admitted to prove intent, motive and identity, and relationship between the parties |
R v Nickerson, 1996 CanLII 3664 (NS SC), [1996] NSJ No. 342, per Haliburton J | 3 witnesses recanted, saying they forgot, were intoxicated at time, were misunderstood by police--court admitted prior statements--reliability found based on separate and corroborating statements, the witnesses understood need for truth, and it was accurately recorded |