Procedure on Seizure of Property: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "c.f." to "cf." |
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1''," |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==General Principles== | ==General Principles== | ||
Upon seizing property under s. 489, the police are obliged to safeguard the items they have seized.<ref> | Upon seizing property under s. 489, the police are obliged to safeguard the items they have seized.<ref> | ||
R v Strilec, [http://canlii.ca/t/29d54 2010 BCCA 198] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Ryan JA}}<br> | ''R v Strilec'', [http://canlii.ca/t/29d54 2010 BCCA 198] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Ryan JA}}<br> | ||
R v Wint [http://canlii.ca/t/225zz 2009 ONCA 52] (CanLII){{TheCourt}}<br> | R v Wint [http://canlii.ca/t/225zz 2009 ONCA 52] (CanLII){{TheCourt}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Section 489.1 governs the procedure to be followed by the police upon seizing property, whether under warrant, warrantless, or otherwise under an Act of Parliament including s. 489. This applies to seizure on search incident to arrest as well as seizure incidental to a search warrant.<ref> | Section 489.1 governs the procedure to be followed by the police upon seizing property, whether under warrant, warrantless, or otherwise under an Act of Parliament including s. 489. This applies to seizure on search incident to arrest as well as seizure incidental to a search warrant.<ref> | ||
R v Backhouse, [http://canlii.ca/t/1jvwn 2005 CanLII 4937] (ON CA){{perONCA|Rosenberg JA}}</ref> | ''R v Backhouse'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1jvwn 2005 CanLII 4937] (ON CA){{perONCA|Rosenberg JA}}</ref> | ||
{{Quotation| | {{Quotation| | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
Section 8 of the Charter can apply to the detention of items seized under s. 489 and 489.1.<ref> | Section 8 of the Charter can apply to the detention of items seized under s. 489 and 489.1.<ref> | ||
R v Garcia-Machado, [http://canlii.ca/t/g373v 2014 ONCJ 81] (CanLII), [2014] OJ No 818{{perONCJ|Band J}} at para 50<br> | R v Garcia-Machado, [http://canlii.ca/t/g373v 2014 ONCJ 81] (CanLII), [2014] OJ No 818{{perONCJ|Band J}} at para 50<br> | ||
cf. R v Persaud, [2008] OJ No 5077 (SCJ){{NOCANLII}}<br> | cf. ''R v Persaud'', [2008] OJ No 5077 (SCJ){{NOCANLII}}<br> | ||
cf. R v Vinneau, [http://canlii.ca/t/2cqj2 2010 NBPC 19] (CanLII), [2010] NBJ No 122 (PC){{perNBPC|LeBlanc J}}<br> | cf. ''R v Vinneau'', [http://canlii.ca/t/2cqj2 2010 NBPC 19] (CanLII), [2010] NBJ No 122 (PC){{perNBPC|LeBlanc J}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Unreasonable retention of property may give rise to a s. 8 violation.<ref> | Unreasonable retention of property may give rise to a s. 8 violation.<ref> | ||
R v Kirubanathan [2011] OJ No 5766 (S.C.J.){{NOCANLII}}<br> | R v Kirubanathan [2011] OJ No 5766 (S.C.J.){{NOCANLII}}<br> | ||
R v Poulin [2004] OJ No 1354 (S.C.J.){{NOCANLII}}<Br> | R v Poulin [2004] OJ No 1354 (S.C.J.){{NOCANLII}}<Br> | ||
R v Villaroman, [http://canlii.ca/t/fx9ch 2012 ABQB 630] (CanLII), [2012] AJ No 1425 (Q.B.){{perABQB|Yamauchi J}}, appealed on other matters to [http://canlii.ca/t/gsq3b 2016 SCC 33] (CanLII){{perSCC|Cromwell J}}<Br> | ''R v Villaroman'', [http://canlii.ca/t/fx9ch 2012 ABQB 630] (CanLII), [2012] AJ No 1425 (Q.B.){{perABQB|Yamauchi J}}, appealed on other matters to [http://canlii.ca/t/gsq3b 2016 SCC 33] (CanLII){{perSCC|Cromwell J}}<Br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
A failure to report to the justice that the property was seized without a warrant is a violation of s. 8 of the Charter.<ref> | A failure to report to the justice that the property was seized without a warrant is a violation of s. 8 of the Charter.<ref> | ||
e.g. R v Butters, [http://canlii.ca/t/gm5m8 2015 ONCA 783] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} at para 5<Br> | e.g. ''R v Butters'', [http://canlii.ca/t/gm5m8 2015 ONCA 783] (CanLII){{TheCourt}} at para 5<Br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
{{seealso|List of Criminal Code Forms}} | {{seealso|List of Criminal Code Forms}} | ||
Section 489.1 requires the seizing officer to file a [[List of Criminal Code Forms|Form 5.2]] to the Justice who authorized the search. This requirement applies to seizures under s. 487 and s. 11 CDSA.<ref> | Section 489.1 requires the seizing officer to file a [[List of Criminal Code Forms|Form 5.2]] to the Justice who authorized the search. This requirement applies to seizures under s. 487 and s. 11 CDSA.<ref> | ||
e.g. R v Carpio, [http://canlii.ca/t/g1rmg 2013 BCPC 305] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Mrozinski J}} - discusses requirements under CDSA<br> | e.g. ''R v Carpio'', [http://canlii.ca/t/g1rmg 2013 BCPC 305] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Mrozinski J}} - discusses requirements under CDSA<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
A failure to file a report to justice under Form 5.2 does not render a valid search invalid, however, it ''will'' render detention of the items unreasonable and in breach of s. 8 of the Charter.<ref> | A failure to file a report to justice under Form 5.2 does not render a valid search invalid, however, it ''will'' render detention of the items unreasonable and in breach of s. 8 of the Charter.<ref> | ||
R v Craig, [http://canlii.ca/t/gpbj5 2016 BCCA 154] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bennett JA}} at para 177 to 184<br> | ''R v Craig'', [http://canlii.ca/t/gpbj5 2016 BCCA 154] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bennett JA}} at para 177 to 184<br> | ||
R v Arason, (1992), [http://canlii.ca/t/1d9tq 1992 CanLII 1008] (BC CA), 78 CCC (3d) 1 (BCCA){{perBCCA|Cumming JA}} - court says failure to file the form does not affect the validity of the search<Br> | ''R v Arason'', (1992), [http://canlii.ca/t/1d9tq 1992 CanLII 1008] (BC CA), 78 CCC (3d) 1 (BCCA){{perBCCA|Cumming JA}} - court says failure to file the form does not affect the validity of the search<Br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
The filing of a report is considered the "gateway" to "important procedural protections under s. 489.1 and 490 and so must be timely.<ref> | The filing of a report is considered the "gateway" to "important procedural protections under s. 489.1 and 490 and so must be timely.<ref> | ||
R v Reeves, [http://canlii.ca/t/hphzk 2017 ONCA 365]{{perONCA|LaForme JA}} at para 78, pending appeal to SCC<Br> | ''R v Reeves'', [http://canlii.ca/t/hphzk 2017 ONCA 365]{{perONCA|LaForme JA}} at para 78, pending appeal to SCC<Br> | ||
R v Garcia-Machado, [http://canlii.ca/t/gkjkl 2015 ONCA 569] (CanLII){{perONCA|Hoy ACJ}} at para 55<Br> | R v Garcia-Machado, [http://canlii.ca/t/gkjkl 2015 ONCA 569] (CanLII){{perONCA|Hoy ACJ}} at para 55<Br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
'''Timing of Filing'''<br> | '''Timing of Filing'''<br> | ||
The report to justice must be filed "as soon as practiable". Failure to do so may result in a violation of s. 8.<ref> | The report to justice must be filed "as soon as practiable". Failure to do so may result in a violation of s. 8.<ref> | ||
R v Butters, [http://canlii.ca/t/g6r5l 2014 ONCJ 228] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Paciocco J}}, at paras 49 to 57 <br> | ''R v Butters'', [http://canlii.ca/t/g6r5l 2014 ONCJ 228] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Paciocco J}}, at paras 49 to 57 <br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
A late filing of Form 5.2 even by a few days will also violate s. 8 of the Charter.<ref> | A late filing of Form 5.2 even by a few days will also violate s. 8 of the Charter.<ref> | ||
R v Montgomery, [http://canlii.ca/t/gtr51 2016 BCCA 379] (CanLII){{perQCCA|Frankel JA}}{{ats|159 to 160}}<br> | ''R v Montgomery'', [http://canlii.ca/t/gtr51 2016 BCCA 379] (CanLII){{perQCCA|Frankel JA}}{{ats|159 to 160}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Revision as of 12:11, 13 January 2019
General Principles
Upon seizing property under s. 489, the police are obliged to safeguard the items they have seized.[1]
Section 489.1 governs the procedure to be followed by the police upon seizing property, whether under warrant, warrantless, or otherwise under an Act of Parliament including s. 489. This applies to seizure on search incident to arrest as well as seizure incidental to a search warrant.[2]
Restitution of property or report by peace officer
489.1 (1) Subject to this or any other Act of Parliament, where a peace officer has seized anything under a warrant issued under this Act or under section 487.11 or 489 or otherwise in the execution of duties under this or any other Act of Parliament, the peace officer shall, as soon as is practicable,
- (a) where the peace officer is satisfied,
- (i) that there is no dispute as to who is lawfully entitled to possession of the thing seized, and
- (ii) that the continued detention of the thing seized is not required for the purposes of any investigation or a preliminary inquiry, trial or other proceeding,
return the thing seized ... to the person lawfully entitled to its possession and report to the justice who issued the warrant ... or, if no warrant was issued, a justice having jurisdiction in respect of the matter, that he has done so; or
- (b) where the peace officer is not satisfied as described in subparagraphs (a)(i) and (ii),
- (i) bring the thing seized before the justice referred to in paragraph (a), or
- (ii) report to the justice that he has seized the thing and is detaining it or causing it to be detained
to be dealt with by the justice in accordance with subsection 490(1).
...
Form
(3) A report to a justice under this section shall be in the form set out as Form 5.2 in Part XXVIII, varied to suit the case...
R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 72; 1993, c. 40, s. 17; 1997, c. 18, s. 49.
– CCC
Under s. 489.1(1)(b)(ii), where the police seize property either in execution of a warrant or otherwise in execution of their duties, they must file a Report to Justice that is filed with the justice of the peace.
This will permit the officer to hold onto the property for a period of 90 days without laying charges. Where further time is needed the officer must apply for a further detention order under s. 490.
Any property seized pursuant to a search warrant "must be carreid before the justice who issued the warrant to be dealt with by him according to law".[3]
"Justice"
The reference to "justice" requires that the application be heard by a justice of the peace or a judge of the provincial court.[4]
Charter
Section 8 of the Charter can apply to the detention of items seized under s. 489 and 489.1.[5]
Unreasonable retention of property may give rise to a s. 8 violation.[6]
A failure to report to the justice that the property was seized without a warrant is a violation of s. 8 of the Charter.[7]
- ↑
R v Strilec, 2010 BCCA 198 (CanLII), per Ryan JA
R v Wint 2009 ONCA 52 (CanLII), per curiam
- ↑ R v Backhouse, 2005 CanLII 4937 (ON CA), per Rosenberg JA
- ↑
AG (Nova Scotia) v MacIntyre, [1982] 1 SCR 175, 1982 CanLII 14 (SCC), per Dickson J at p. 179
- ↑ see s. 2 "justice" and Definition of Judicial Officers and Offices
- ↑
R v Garcia-Machado, 2014 ONCJ 81 (CanLII), [2014] OJ No 818, per Band J at para 50
cf. R v Persaud, [2008] OJ No 5077 (SCJ)(*no CanLII links)
cf. R v Vinneau, 2010 NBPC 19 (CanLII), [2010] NBJ No 122 (PC), per LeBlanc J
- ↑
R v Kirubanathan [2011] OJ No 5766 (S.C.J.)(*no CanLII links)
R v Poulin [2004] OJ No 1354 (S.C.J.)(*no CanLII links)
R v Villaroman, 2012 ABQB 630 (CanLII), [2012] AJ No 1425 (Q.B.), per Yamauchi J, appealed on other matters to 2016 SCC 33 (CanLII), per Cromwell J
- ↑
e.g. R v Butters, 2015 ONCA 783 (CanLII), per curiam at para 5
Report to Justice
Section 489.1 requires the seizing officer to file a Form 5.2 to the Justice who authorized the search. This requirement applies to seizures under s. 487 and s. 11 CDSA.[1]
489.1
...
Form
(3) A report to a justice under this section shall be in the form set out as Form 5.2 in Part XXVIII [see forms], varied to suit the case and shall include, in the case of a report in respect of a warrant issued by telephone or other means of telecommunication, the statements referred to in subsection 487.1(9).
R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 72; 1993, c. 40, s. 17; 1997, c. 18, s. 49.
[annotation(s) added]
– CCC
A failure to file a report to justice under Form 5.2 does not render a valid search invalid, however, it will render detention of the items unreasonable and in breach of s. 8 of the Charter.[2]
The filing of a report is considered the "gateway" to "important procedural protections under s. 489.1 and 490 and so must be timely.[3] Courts should be "wary of any attempt to characterize the failure to meet the reporting requirements ... as trivial or insignificant".[4]
Timing of Filing
The report to justice must be filed "as soon as practiable". Failure to do so may result in a violation of s. 8.[5]
A late filing of Form 5.2 even by a few days will also violate s. 8 of the Charter.[6]
Section 487 Warrants
Section 487 also contemplates a requirement for a report to justice being made:
Information for search warrant
487. (1) A justice who is satisfied by information on oath in Form 1 [see forms] that there are reasonable grounds to believe that there is in a building, receptacle or place
...
- (e) subject to any other Act of Parliament, to, as soon as practicable, bring the thing seized before, or make a report in respect thereof to, the justice or some other justice for the same territorial division in accordance with section 489.1.
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 487; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 68; 1994, c. 44, s. 36; 1997, c. 18, s. 41, c. 23, s. 12; 1999, c. 5, s. 16; 2008, c. 18, s. 11.
[annotation(s) added]
– CCC
- ↑
e.g. R v Carpio, 2013 BCPC 305 (CanLII), per Mrozinski J - discusses requirements under CDSA
- ↑
R v Craig, 2016 BCCA 154 (CanLII), per Bennett JA at para 177 to 184
R v Arason, (1992), 1992 CanLII 1008 (BC CA), 78 CCC (3d) 1 (BCCA), per Cumming JA - court says failure to file the form does not affect the validity of the search
- ↑
R v Reeves, 2017 ONCA 365, per LaForme JA at para 78, pending appeal to SCC
R v Garcia-Machado, 2015 ONCA 569 (CanLII), per Hoy ACJ at para 55
- ↑
Reeves, supra at para 78
- ↑
R v Butters, 2014 ONCJ 228 (CanLII), per Paciocco J, at paras 49 to 57
- ↑
R v Montgomery, 2016 BCCA 379 (CanLII), per Frankel JA, at paras 159 to 160
See Also
- Detention Order for Things Seized Under Section 489 or 487.11 - Detention Orders