Stay of Proceedings (Cases): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1''," |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Chen,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/25tlr 2009 ONCJ 453] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Fairgrieve J}} || stayed || breach s. 7 for crown changing mind to stay charges. Stay upheld. | | ''R v Chen'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/25tlr 2009 ONCJ 453] (CanLII){{perONCJ|Fairgrieve J}} || stayed || breach s. 7 for crown changing mind to stay charges. Stay upheld. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Arcand, <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/20hqp 2008 ONCA 595] (CanLII){{perONCA|Cronk JA}}||denied || alleged disclosure issues, laying additional charges, differential treatment of accused. | |''R v Arcand'', <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/20hqp 2008 ONCA 595] (CanLII){{perONCA|Cronk JA}}||denied || alleged disclosure issues, laying additional charges, differential treatment of accused. | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Vader,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw36g 2013 ABQB 68] (CanLII){{perABQB| Ross J}} || not stayed || | | ''R v Vader'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw36g 2013 ABQB 68] (CanLII){{perABQB| Ross J}} || not stayed || | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Tweedly, <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fxkfs 2013 BCSC 910] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Greyell J}} || stayed || Two police witnesses lost their notes. The notes were used in the ITO of a search warrant. | |''R v Tweedly'', <Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fxkfs 2013 BCSC 910] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Greyell J}} || stayed || Two police witnesses lost their notes. The notes were used in the ITO of a search warrant. | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ! Case Name !! Result !! Summary | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Maskell, <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm5zv 2011 ABPC 176] (CanLII){{perABPC|Groves J}} || stay || force used while arresting for driving while disqualified | |''R v Maskell'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm5zv 2011 ABPC 176] (CanLII){{perABPC|Groves J}} || stay || force used while arresting for driving while disqualified | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Steele,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28z27 2010 ABQB 191] (CanLII){{perABQB| Macklin J}} || stay ||excessive force in arresting accused | |''R v Steele'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/28z27 2010 ABQB 191] (CanLII){{perABQB| Macklin J}} || stay ||excessive force in arresting accused | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Delay== | ==Delay== | ||
* [[Charter Delay (Cases)]] | * [[Charter Delay (Cases)]] | ||
Revision as of 12:13, 13 January 2019
Section 7: Prosecutor Abuse of Process
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Chen, 2009 ONCJ 453 (CanLII), per Fairgrieve J |
stayed | breach s. 7 for crown changing mind to stay charges. Stay upheld. |
| R v Arcand, 2008 ONCA 595 (CanLII), per Cronk JA |
denied | alleged disclosure issues, laying additional charges, differential treatment of accused. |
Section 7 - Disclosure
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Vader, 2013 ABQB 68 (CanLII), per Ross J |
not stayed | |
| R v Tweedly, 2013 BCSC 910 (CanLII), per Greyell J |
stayed | Two police witnesses lost their notes. The notes were used in the ITO of a search warrant. |
Section 12 - Cruel and Unusual Punishment
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Tang 2011 ONCJ 525 (CanLII), per Reinhardt J |
stay granted |
Abuse by Police
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Maskell, 2011 ABPC 176 (CanLII), per Groves J |
stay | force used while arresting for driving while disqualified |
| R v Steele, 2010 ABQB 191 (CanLII), per Macklin J |
stay | excessive force in arresting accused |