Mandamus, Certiorari, and Prohibition (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "<Br>" to "<br>"
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)<br>" to "''$1''<br>"
Line 7: Line 7:
! Case Name !!Summary
! Case Name !!Summary
|-
|-
|R v Faber<br>(1987), 38 CCC (3d) 49 (Que. Sup. Ct.), [http://canlii.ca/t/gcr90 1987 CanLII 6849] (QC CS){{perQCCS|Boilard J}} ||The Applicant sought to compel the attorney general to withdraw a stay of proceedings against someone charged with murder
|''R v Faber''<br>(1987), 38 CCC (3d) 49 (Que. Sup. Ct.), [http://canlii.ca/t/gcr90 1987 CanLII 6849] (QC CS){{perQCCS|Boilard J}} ||The Applicant sought to compel the attorney general to withdraw a stay of proceedings against someone charged with murder
|-
|-
|R v Coughlan<br> (1969), [1970] 3 CCC 61 (Alta. T.D.), [http://canlii.ca/t/htvj8 1969 CanLII 949] (AB QB){{perABQB|Riley J}} ||The Applicant sought to compel a magistrate to issue a summons or warrant who refused to do so after a hearing. The reviewing judge refused to order the writ as it was a discretionary decision of the magistrate.
|''R v Coughlan''<br> (1969), [1970] 3 CCC 61 (Alta. T.D.), [http://canlii.ca/t/htvj8 1969 CanLII 949] (AB QB){{perABQB|Riley J}} ||The Applicant sought to compel a magistrate to issue a summons or warrant who refused to do so after a hearing. The reviewing judge refused to order the writ as it was a discretionary decision of the magistrate.
|-
|-
|}
|}

Revision as of 14:48, 13 January 2019

Case Name Summary
R v Faber
(1987), 38 CCC (3d) 49 (Que. Sup. Ct.), 1987 CanLII 6849 (QC CS), per Boilard J
The Applicant sought to compel the attorney general to withdraw a stay of proceedings against someone charged with murder
R v Coughlan
(1969), [1970] 3 CCC 61 (Alta. T.D.), 1969 CanLII 949 (AB QB), per Riley J
The Applicant sought to compel a magistrate to issue a summons or warrant who refused to do so after a hearing. The reviewing judge refused to order the writ as it was a discretionary decision of the magistrate.