Child Pornography (Trial Verdicts): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+ [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1''," |
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)<br>" to "''$1''<br>" |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|''R v Giuseppe Michienzi'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw9r5 2013 ONSC 1025] (CanLII){{perONSC|Bryant J}} ||guilt of poss'n, not guilty of making available || | |''R v Giuseppe Michienzi'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw9r5 2013 ONSC 1025] (CanLII){{perONSC|Bryant J}} ||guilt of poss'n, not guilty of making available || | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R v Douglas<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw4zq 2013 SKQB 33]] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}}|| guilty of poss'n and making avail. || through treatment of evidence and law | |''R v Douglas''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw4zq 2013 SKQB 33]] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}}|| guilty of poss'n and making avail. || through treatment of evidence and law | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Lorenz<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fsdc5 2012 SKQB 293] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}} || acquitted for making CP || | | ''R v Lorenz''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fsdc5 2012 SKQB 293] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}} || acquitted for making CP || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Jacques<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs3jm 2012 SKQB 277] (CanLII){{perSKQB|McMurtry J}} || guilty of possession and not guilty of making available || P2P case | | ''R v Jacques''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs3jm 2012 SKQB 277] (CanLII){{perSKQB|McMurtry J}} || guilty of possession and not guilty of making available || P2P case | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Clayton <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqr7d 2012 ABQB 196] (CanLII){{perABQB| Eidsvik J}} || conviction || gigatribe distribution | | R v Clayton <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqr7d 2012 ABQB 196] (CanLII){{perABQB| Eidsvik J}} || conviction || gigatribe distribution | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Allart<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqc6k 2012 BCCA 100] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Groberman JA}} || conviction for poss’n CP || | | ''R v Allart''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqc6k 2012 BCCA 100] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Groberman JA}} || conviction for poss’n CP || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v Jeffrey'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpkt9 2012 SKPC 12] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Agnew J}} || guilty of distributing || | | ''R v Jeffrey'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpkt9 2012 SKPC 12] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Agnew J}} || guilty of distributing || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Wanamaker<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/flb5k 2011 ABQB 310] (CanLII){{perABQB|H McDonald J}} || guilty|| | | ''R v Wanamaker''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/flb5k 2011 ABQB 310] (CanLII){{perABQB|H McDonald J}} || guilty|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v SS<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm7rf 2011 SKPC 102] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Koskie J}} || not guilty ||judge could not determine age of youths in images | | R v SS<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fm7rf 2011 SKPC 102] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Koskie J}} || not guilty ||judge could not determine age of youths in images | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Carrano<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpgrn 2011 ONSC 7718] (CanLII){{perONSC|Trotter J}} || acquittal for innocent possession of CP|| | | ''R v Carrano''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpgrn 2011 ONSC 7718] (CanLII){{perONSC|Trotter J}} || acquittal for innocent possession of CP|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Jones<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fncds 2011 ONCA 632] (CanLII){{perONCA|Blair JA}} || || new trial ordered | | ''R v Jones''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fncds 2011 ONCA 632] (CanLII){{perONCA|Blair JA}} || || new trial ordered | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Smith<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fq71j 2011 BCSC 1826] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Brown J}} || || | | ''R v Smith''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fq71j 2011 BCSC 1826] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Brown J}} || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Love<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2fl9j 2011 ABPC 40] (CanLII){{perABPC|Philp J}} ||not guilty || not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession | | ''R v Love''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2fl9j 2011 ABPC 40] (CanLII){{perABPC|Philp J}} ||not guilty || not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v R.D.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b7hh 2010 BCCA 313] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bennett JA}} || not guilty|| | | R v R.D.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b7hh 2010 BCCA 313] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bennett JA}} || not guilty|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Garbett<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29qq4 2010 ONSC 2762] (CanLII){{perONSC|Tulloch J}} || || | | ''R v Garbett''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29qq4 2010 ONSC 2762] (CanLII){{perONSC|Tulloch J}} || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Spencer<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp3pb 2011 SKCA 144] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Caldwell JA}} || conviction upheld || | | ''R v Spencer''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp3pb 2011 SKCA 144] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Caldwell JA}} || conviction upheld || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Leugner<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpf08 2011 SKQB 469] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Keene J}} || ||accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books | | ''R v Leugner''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpf08 2011 SKQB 469] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Keene J}} || ||accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Leugner<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/29p3f 2010 SKPC 50] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kovatch J}} || guilty of importing and possession|| fictional stories of child sexual abuse | | ''R v Leugner''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/29p3f 2010 SKPC 50] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kovatch J}} || guilty of importing and possession|| fictional stories of child sexual abuse | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Rudiger<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c72l 2010 BCPC 182] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Blaskovits J}} || guilty || possession; considered definition | | ''R v Rudiger''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c72l 2010 BCPC 182] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Blaskovits J}} || guilty || possession; considered definition | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Pressacco<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2919s 2010 SKQB 114] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Currie J}} || guilty of possessing and accessing CP || | | ''R v Pressacco''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2919s 2010 SKQB 114] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Currie J}} || guilty of possessing and accessing CP || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v C.M.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/24f51 2009 MBPC 35] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Martin J}} || guilty of making and possessing CP || | | R v C.M.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/24f51 2009 MBPC 35] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Martin J}} || guilty of making and possessing CP || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Grant<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/22kq2 2009 BCCA 72] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty || | | ''R v Grant''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/22kq2 2009 BCCA 72] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Trapp<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/26h9x 2009 SKPC 109] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kolenick J}} || conviction for making CP available || | | ''R v Trapp''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/26h9x 2009 SKPC 109] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kolenick J}} || conviction for making CP available || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v Ballendine'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fmdm1 2009 BCSC 1938] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Cullen J}} || not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else|| | | ''R v Ballendine'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fmdm1 2009 BCSC 1938] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Cullen J}} || not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Johannson<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/223vf 2008 SKQB 451] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Gabrielson J}} || guilty of making available || | | ''R v Johannson''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/223vf 2008 SKQB 451] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Gabrielson J}} || guilty of making available || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Dittrich<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wr2f 2008 CanLII 19217] (ON SC){{perONSC|Jenkins J}} || guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making|| | | ''R v Dittrich''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wr2f 2008 CanLII 19217] (ON SC){{perONSC|Jenkins J}} || guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Dabrowski<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1sw9b 2007 ONCA 619] (CanLII){{perONCA|MacPherson JA}}|| || | | ''R v Dabrowski''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1sw9b 2007 ONCA 619] (CanLII){{perONCA|MacPherson JA}}|| || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Tripp<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ssbc 2007 NBPC 32] (CanLII){{perNBPC|Arseneault J}} || not guilty for possession|| | | ''R v Tripp''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ssbc 2007 NBPC 32] (CanLII){{perNBPC|Arseneault J}} || not guilty for possession|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Horvat<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n42j 2006 CanLII 13426] (ON SC){{perONSC|Lack J}} || guilty|| | | ''R v Horvat''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n42j 2006 CanLII 13426] (ON SC){{perONSC|Lack J}} || guilty|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Beattie<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1k3qf 2005 CanLII 10273] (ON CA){{perONCA|Laskin JA}} || acquittal overturned ||pornographic stories | | ''R v Beattie''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1k3qf 2005 CanLII 10273] (ON CA){{perONCA|Laskin JA}} || acquittal overturned ||pornographic stories | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v J.E.I.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1m3l7 2005 BCCA 584] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty || considers dominant purpose | | R v J.E.I.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1m3l7 2005 BCCA 584] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty || considers dominant purpose | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
| R v S. (V.P.)<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4xh7 2001 BCSC 619] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Bauman J}} || guilty ||considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose | | R v S. (V.P.)<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4xh7 2001 BCSC 619] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Bauman J}} || guilty ||considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Nedelec<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4wvm 2001 BCSC 1334] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Wedge J}} || guilty of possession || considers definition | | ''R v Nedelec''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4wvm 2001 BCSC 1334] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Wedge J}} || guilty of possession || considers definition | ||
|- | |- | ||
| R v Weir<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5qng 1998 ABQB 56] (CanLII){{perABQB|PLJ Smith J}} || guilty of distribution|| | | ''R v Weir''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5qng 1998 ABQB 56] (CanLII){{perABQB|PLJ Smith J}} || guilty of distribution|| | ||
{{SCaseEnd}} | {{SCaseEnd}} |
Revision as of 13:58, 13 January 2019
- < Criminal Law
- < Cases
|
Case Digests
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Tyler Perkins, 2013 ONSC 1807 (CanLII), per Ferguson J |
evidence excluded | S. 8, 9, 10(b) of Charter raised. |
R v Giuseppe Michienzi, 2013 ONSC 1025 (CanLII), per Bryant J |
guilt of poss'n, not guilty of making available | |
R v Douglas 2013 SKQB 33] (CanLII), per Schwann J |
guilty of poss'n and making avail. | through treatment of evidence and law |
R v Lorenz 2012 SKQB 293 (CanLII), per Schwann J |
acquitted for making CP | |
R v Jacques 2012 SKQB 277 (CanLII), per McMurtry J |
guilty of possession and not guilty of making available | P2P case |
R v Clayton 2012 ABQB 196 (CanLII), per Eidsvik J |
conviction | gigatribe distribution |
R v Allart 2012 BCCA 100 (CanLII), per Groberman JA |
conviction for poss’n CP | |
R v Jeffrey, 2012 SKPC 12 (CanLII), per Agnew J |
guilty of distributing | |
R v Wanamaker 2011 ABQB 310 (CanLII), per H McDonald J |
guilty | |
R v SS 2011 SKPC 102 (CanLII), per Koskie J |
not guilty | judge could not determine age of youths in images |
R v Carrano 2011 ONSC 7718 (CanLII), per Trotter J |
acquittal for innocent possession of CP | |
R v Jones 2011 ONCA 632 (CanLII), per Blair JA |
new trial ordered | |
R v Smith 2011 BCSC 1826 (CanLII), per Brown J |
||
R v Love 2011 ABPC 40 (CanLII), per Philp J |
not guilty | not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession |
R v R.D. 2010 BCCA 313 (CanLII), per Bennett JA |
not guilty | |
R v Garbett 2010 ONSC 2762 (CanLII), per Tulloch J |
||
R v Spencer 2011 SKCA 144 (CanLII), per Caldwell JA |
conviction upheld | |
R v Leugner 2011 SKQB 469 (CanLII), per Keene J |
accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books | |
R v Leugner 2010 SKPC 50 (CanLII), per Kovatch J |
guilty of importing and possession | fictional stories of child sexual abuse |
R v Rudiger 2010 BCPC 182 (CanLII), per Blaskovits J |
guilty | possession; considered definition |
R v Pressacco 2010 SKQB 114 (CanLII), per Currie J |
guilty of possessing and accessing CP | |
R v C.M. 2009 MBPC 35 (CanLII), per Martin J |
guilty of making and possessing CP | |
R v Grant 2009 BCCA 72 (CanLII), per Finch CJ |
guilty | |
R v Trapp 2009 SKPC 109 (CanLII), per Kolenick J |
conviction for making CP available | |
R v Ballendine, 2009 BCSC 1938 (CanLII), per Cullen J |
not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else | |
R v Johannson 2008 SKQB 451 (CanLII), per Gabrielson J |
guilty of making available | |
R v Dittrich 2008 CanLII 19217 (ON SC), per Jenkins J |
guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making | |
R v Dabrowski 2007 ONCA 619 (CanLII), per MacPherson JA |
||
R v Tripp 2007 NBPC 32 (CanLII), per Arseneault J |
not guilty for possession | |
R v Horvat 2006 CanLII 13426 (ON SC), per Lack J |
guilty | |
R v Beattie 2005 CanLII 10273 (ON CA), per Laskin JA |
acquittal overturned | pornographic stories |
R v J.E.I. 2005 BCCA 584 (CanLII), per Finch CJ |
guilty | considers dominant purpose |
R v S. (V.P.) 2001 BCSC 619 (CanLII), per Bauman J |
guilty | considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose |
R v Nedelec 2001 BCSC 1334 (CanLII), per Wedge J |
guilty of possession | considers definition |
R v Weir 1998 ABQB 56 (CanLII), per PLJ Smith J |
guilty of distribution |