Child Pornography (Trial Verdicts): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+ [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1'',"
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)<br>" to "''$1''<br>"
Line 12: Line 12:
|''R v Giuseppe Michienzi'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw9r5 2013 ONSC 1025] (CanLII){{perONSC|Bryant J}} ||guilt of poss'n, not guilty of making available ||
|''R v Giuseppe Michienzi'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw9r5 2013 ONSC 1025] (CanLII){{perONSC|Bryant J}} ||guilt of poss'n, not guilty of making available ||
|-
|-
|R v Douglas<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw4zq 2013 SKQB 33]] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}}|| guilty of poss'n and making avail. || through treatment of evidence and law
|''R v Douglas''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fw4zq 2013 SKQB 33]] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}}|| guilty of poss'n and making avail. || through treatment of evidence and law
|-
|-
| R v Lorenz<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fsdc5 2012 SKQB 293] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}} || acquitted for making CP ||
| ''R v Lorenz''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fsdc5 2012 SKQB 293] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Schwann J}} || acquitted for making CP ||
|-
|-
|  R v Jacques<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs3jm 2012 SKQB 277] (CanLII){{perSKQB|McMurtry J}} || guilty of possession and not guilty of making available || P2P case
''R v Jacques''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fs3jm 2012 SKQB 277] (CanLII){{perSKQB|McMurtry J}} || guilty of possession and not guilty of making available || P2P case
|-
|-
|  R v Clayton <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqr7d 2012 ABQB 196] (CanLII){{perABQB| Eidsvik J}} || conviction || gigatribe distribution
|  R v Clayton <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fqr7d 2012 ABQB 196] (CanLII){{perABQB| Eidsvik J}} || conviction || gigatribe distribution
|-
|-
| R v Allart<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqc6k 2012 BCCA 100] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Groberman JA}} || conviction for poss’n CP ||
| ''R v Allart''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqc6k 2012 BCCA 100] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Groberman JA}} || conviction for poss’n CP ||
|-
|-
|  ''R v Jeffrey'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fpkt9 2012 SKPC 12] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Agnew J}} || guilty of distributing ||
|  ''R v Jeffrey'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fpkt9 2012 SKPC 12] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Agnew J}} || guilty of distributing ||
|-
|-
|  R v Wanamaker<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/flb5k 2011 ABQB 310] (CanLII){{perABQB|H McDonald J}} || guilty||
''R v Wanamaker''<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/flb5k 2011 ABQB 310] (CanLII){{perABQB|H McDonald J}} || guilty||
|-
|-
| R v SS<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fm7rf 2011 SKPC 102] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Koskie J}} || not guilty ||judge could not determine age of youths in images
| R v SS<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fm7rf 2011 SKPC 102] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Koskie J}} || not guilty ||judge could not determine age of youths in images
|-
|-
|  R v Carrano<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpgrn 2011 ONSC 7718] (CanLII){{perONSC|Trotter J}} || acquittal for innocent possession of CP||
''R v Carrano''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpgrn 2011 ONSC 7718] (CanLII){{perONSC|Trotter J}} || acquittal for innocent possession of CP||
|-
|-
|  R v Jones<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fncds 2011 ONCA 632] (CanLII){{perONCA|Blair JA}} ||  || new trial ordered
''R v Jones''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fncds 2011 ONCA 632] (CanLII){{perONCA|Blair JA}} ||  || new trial ordered
|-
|-
|  R v Smith<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fq71j 2011 BCSC 1826] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Brown J}} || ||
''R v Smith''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fq71j 2011 BCSC 1826] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Brown J}} || ||
|-
|-
|  R v Love<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2fl9j 2011 ABPC 40] (CanLII){{perABPC|Philp J}} ||not guilty || not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession
''R v Love''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2fl9j 2011 ABPC 40] (CanLII){{perABPC|Philp J}} ||not guilty || not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession
|-
|-
|  R v R.D.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b7hh 2010 BCCA 313] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bennett JA}} || not guilty||
|  R v R.D.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2b7hh 2010 BCCA 313] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Bennett JA}} || not guilty||
|-
|-
|  R v Garbett<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29qq4 2010 ONSC 2762] (CanLII){{perONSC|Tulloch J}} || ||
''R v Garbett''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29qq4 2010 ONSC 2762] (CanLII){{perONSC|Tulloch J}} || ||
|-
|-
|  R v Spencer<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp3pb 2011 SKCA 144] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Caldwell JA}} || conviction upheld ||
''R v Spencer''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fp3pb 2011 SKCA 144] (CanLII){{perSKCA|Caldwell JA}} || conviction upheld ||
|-
|-
|  R v Leugner<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpf08 2011 SKQB 469] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Keene J}} || ||accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books
''R v Leugner''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fpf08 2011 SKQB 469] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Keene J}} || ||accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books
|-
|-
| R v Leugner<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/29p3f 2010 SKPC 50] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kovatch J}} || guilty of importing and possession|| fictional stories of child sexual abuse
| ''R v Leugner''<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/29p3f 2010 SKPC 50] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kovatch J}} || guilty of importing and possession|| fictional stories of child sexual abuse
|-
|-
|  R v Rudiger<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c72l 2010 BCPC 182] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Blaskovits J}} || guilty || possession; considered definition
''R v Rudiger''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2c72l 2010 BCPC 182] (CanLII){{perBCPC|Blaskovits J}} || guilty || possession; considered definition
|-
|-
|  R v Pressacco<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2919s 2010 SKQB 114] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Currie J}} || guilty of possessing and accessing CP ||
''R v Pressacco''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2919s 2010 SKQB 114] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Currie J}} || guilty of possessing and accessing CP ||
|-
|-
|  R v C.M.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/24f51 2009 MBPC 35] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Martin J}} || guilty of making and possessing CP ||
|  R v C.M.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/24f51 2009 MBPC 35] (CanLII){{perMBPC|Martin J}} || guilty of making and possessing CP ||
|-
|-
|  R v Grant<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/22kq2 2009 BCCA 72] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty ||
''R v Grant''<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/22kq2 2009 BCCA 72] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty ||
|-
|-
|  R v Trapp<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/26h9x 2009 SKPC 109] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kolenick J}} || conviction for making CP available ||
''R v Trapp''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/26h9x 2009 SKPC 109] (CanLII){{perSKPC|Kolenick J}} || conviction for making CP available ||
|-
|-
|  ''R v Ballendine'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fmdm1 2009 BCSC 1938] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Cullen J}} || not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else||
|  ''R v Ballendine'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fmdm1 2009 BCSC 1938] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Cullen J}} || not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else||
|-
|-
|  R v Johannson<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/223vf 2008 SKQB 451] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Gabrielson J}} || guilty of making available ||
''R v Johannson''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/223vf 2008 SKQB 451] (CanLII){{perSKQB|Gabrielson J}} || guilty of making available ||
|-
|-
|  R v Dittrich<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wr2f 2008 CanLII 19217] (ON SC){{perONSC|Jenkins J}} || guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making||
''R v Dittrich''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wr2f 2008 CanLII 19217] (ON SC){{perONSC|Jenkins J}} || guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making||
|-
|-
|  R v Dabrowski<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1sw9b 2007 ONCA 619] (CanLII){{perONCA|MacPherson JA}}|| ||
''R v Dabrowski''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1sw9b 2007 ONCA 619] (CanLII){{perONCA|MacPherson JA}}|| ||
|-
|-
|  R v Tripp<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ssbc 2007 NBPC 32] (CanLII){{perNBPC|Arseneault J}} || not guilty for possession||
''R v Tripp''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1ssbc 2007 NBPC 32] (CanLII){{perNBPC|Arseneault J}} || not guilty for possession||
|-
|-
|  R v Horvat<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n42j 2006 CanLII 13426] (ON SC){{perONSC|Lack J}} || guilty||
''R v Horvat''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n42j 2006 CanLII 13426] (ON SC){{perONSC|Lack J}} || guilty||
|-
|-
|  R v Beattie<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1k3qf 2005 CanLII 10273] (ON CA){{perONCA|Laskin JA}} || acquittal overturned ||pornographic stories
''R v Beattie''<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1k3qf 2005 CanLII 10273] (ON CA){{perONCA|Laskin JA}} || acquittal overturned ||pornographic stories
|-
|-
|  R v J.E.I.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1m3l7 2005 BCCA 584] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty || considers dominant purpose
|  R v J.E.I.<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1m3l7 2005 BCCA 584] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Finch CJ}} || guilty || considers dominant purpose
Line 74: Line 74:
|  R v S. (V.P.)<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4xh7 2001 BCSC 619] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Bauman J}} || guilty  ||considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose
|  R v S. (V.P.)<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4xh7 2001 BCSC 619] (CanLII){{perBCSC| Bauman J}} || guilty  ||considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose
|-
|-
| R v Nedelec<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4wvm 2001 BCSC 1334] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Wedge J}} || guilty of possession || considers definition
| ''R v Nedelec''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/4wvm 2001 BCSC 1334] (CanLII){{perBCSC|Wedge J}} || guilty of possession || considers definition
|-
|-
|  R v Weir<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5qng 1998 ABQB 56] (CanLII){{perABQB|PLJ Smith J}} || guilty of distribution||
''R v Weir''<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/5qng 1998 ABQB 56] (CanLII){{perABQB|PLJ Smith J}} || guilty of distribution||


{{SCaseEnd}}
{{SCaseEnd}}

Revision as of 13:58, 13 January 2019

Case Digests

Case Name Result Summary
R v Tyler Perkins,
2013 ONSC 1807 (CanLII), per Ferguson J
evidence excluded S. 8, 9, 10(b) of Charter raised.
R v Giuseppe Michienzi,
2013 ONSC 1025 (CanLII), per Bryant J
guilt of poss'n, not guilty of making available
R v Douglas
2013 SKQB 33] (CanLII), per Schwann J
guilty of poss'n and making avail. through treatment of evidence and law
R v Lorenz
2012 SKQB 293 (CanLII), per Schwann J
acquitted for making CP
R v Jacques
2012 SKQB 277 (CanLII), per McMurtry J
guilty of possession and not guilty of making available P2P case
R v Clayton
2012 ABQB 196 (CanLII), per Eidsvik J
conviction gigatribe distribution
R v Allart
2012 BCCA 100 (CanLII), per Groberman JA
conviction for poss’n CP
R v Jeffrey,
2012 SKPC 12 (CanLII), per Agnew J
guilty of distributing
R v Wanamaker
2011 ABQB 310 (CanLII), per H McDonald J
guilty
R v SS
2011 SKPC 102 (CanLII), per Koskie J
not guilty judge could not determine age of youths in images
R v Carrano
2011 ONSC 7718 (CanLII), per Trotter J
acquittal for innocent possession of CP
R v Jones
2011 ONCA 632 (CanLII), per Blair JA
new trial ordered
R v Smith
2011 BCSC 1826 (CanLII), per Brown J
R v Love
2011 ABPC 40 (CanLII), per Philp J
not guilty not guilty due to lack of evidence of possession
R v R.D.
2010 BCCA 313 (CanLII), per Bennett JA
not guilty
R v Garbett
2010 ONSC 2762 (CanLII), per Tulloch J
R v Spencer
2011 SKCA 144 (CanLII), per Caldwell JA
conviction upheld
R v Leugner
2011 SKQB 469 (CanLII), per Keene J
accused argued officially induced error on possession of CP books
R v Leugner
2010 SKPC 50 (CanLII), per Kovatch J
guilty of importing and possession fictional stories of child sexual abuse
R v Rudiger
2010 BCPC 182 (CanLII), per Blaskovits J
guilty possession; considered definition
R v Pressacco
2010 SKQB 114 (CanLII), per Currie J
guilty of possessing and accessing CP
R v C.M.
2009 MBPC 35 (CanLII), per Martin J
guilty of making and possessing CP
R v Grant
2009 BCCA 72 (CanLII), per Finch CJ
guilty
R v Trapp
2009 SKPC 109 (CanLII), per Kolenick J
conviction for making CP available
R v Ballendine,
2009 BCSC 1938 (CanLII), per Cullen J
not guilty for making, but guilty for everything else
R v Johannson
2008 SKQB 451 (CanLII), per Gabrielson J
guilty of making available
R v Dittrich
2008 CanLII 19217 (ON SC), per Jenkins J
guilty of possession, not guilty of accessing and making
R v Dabrowski
2007 ONCA 619 (CanLII), per MacPherson JA
R v Tripp
2007 NBPC 32 (CanLII), per Arseneault J
not guilty for possession
R v Horvat
2006 CanLII 13426 (ON SC), per Lack J
guilty
R v Beattie
2005 CanLII 10273 (ON CA), per Laskin JA
acquittal overturned pornographic stories
R v J.E.I.
2005 BCCA 584 (CanLII), per Finch CJ
guilty considers dominant purpose
R v S. (V.P.)
2001 BCSC 619 (CanLII), per Bauman J
guilty considered definition of sexual organ and dominant purpose
R v Nedelec
2001 BCSC 1334 (CanLII), per Wedge J
guilty of possession considers definition
R v Weir
1998 ABQB 56 (CanLII), per PLJ Smith J
guilty of distribution