Kienapple (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "(R v [A-Z][a-z]+)," to "''$1'',"
m Text replacement - "([a-zA-Z]+) v The Queen," to "''$1 v The Queen'',"
Line 13: Line 13:
| ''R v Ramage'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bkq5 2010 ONCA 488] (CanLII){{perONCA|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
| ''R v Ramage'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bkq5 2010 ONCA 488] (CanLII){{perONCA|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
|-
|-
|John v The Queen,<br> [1985] 2 SCR 476, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftxp 1985 CanLII 15] (SCC){{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}||  
|''John v The Queen'',<br> [1985] 2 SCR 476, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftxp 1985 CanLII 15] (SCC){{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}||  
|-
|-
| ''R v Davis'',<br>[1999] 3 SCR 759, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fql7 1999 CanLII 638] (SCC){{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}||
| ''R v Davis'',<br>[1999] 3 SCR 759, [http://canlii.ca/t/1fql7 1999 CanLII 638] (SCC){{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}||

Revision as of 23:55, 16 January 2019

Kienapple

See also: Kienapple Principle
Case Name Summary
R v Hope,
2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII), per Stack J
sexual assault and sexual interference
R v Ramage,
2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII), per Doherty JA
Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
John v The Queen,
[1985] 2 SCR 476, 1985 CanLII 15 (SCC), per Estey and Lamer JJ
R v Davis,
[1999] 3 SCR 759, 1999 CanLII 638 (SCC), per Lamer CJ
R v Prince,
[1986] 2 SCR 480, 1986 CanLII 40 (SCC), per Dickson CJ
R v Pringle,
[1989] 1 SCR 1645, 1989 CanLII 65 (SCC), per Lamer J
R v Wigman,
[1987] 1 SCR 246, 1985 CanLII 1 (SCC), per curiam