Kienapple (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "([a-zA-Z]+) v The Queen," to "''$1 v The Queen''," |
m Text replacement - "SCC){{TheCourt}}" to "SCC){{TheCourtSCC}}" |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| ''R v Pringle'',<br> [1989] 1 SCR 1645, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ft4b 1989 CanLII 65] (SCC){{perSCC|Lamer J}}|| | | ''R v Pringle'',<br> [1989] 1 SCR 1645, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ft4b 1989 CanLII 65] (SCC){{perSCC|Lamer J}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ''R v Wigman'',<br> [1987] 1 SCR 246, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftnb 1985 CanLII 1] (SCC){{ | | ''R v Wigman'',<br> [1987] 1 SCR 246, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftnb 1985 CanLII 1] (SCC){{TheCourtSCC}}|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 20:08, 17 January 2019
Kienapple
| Case Name | Summary |
|---|---|
| R v Hope, 2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII), per Stack J |
sexual assault and sexual interference |
| R v Ramage, 2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII), per Doherty JA |
Impaired & Dangerous driving valid |
| John v The Queen, [1985] 2 SCR 476, 1985 CanLII 15 (SCC), per Estey and Lamer JJ |
|
| R v Davis, [1999] 3 SCR 759, 1999 CanLII 638 (SCC), per Lamer CJ |
|
| R v Prince, [1986] 2 SCR 480, 1986 CanLII 40 (SCC), per Dickson CJ |
|
| R v Pringle, [1989] 1 SCR 1645, 1989 CanLII 65 (SCC), per Lamer J |
|
| R v Wigman, [1987] 1 SCR 246, 1985 CanLII 1 (SCC), per curiam |