User:Admin: Difference between revisions
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
==Templates== | ==Templates== | ||
<nowiki> | <nowiki> | ||
{{SummaryPending}} | {{SummaryPending}}<br> | ||
{{LinkNeeded}} | {{LinkNeeded}}<br> | ||
{{DraftCharge}} | {{DraftCharge}}<br> | ||
==Record Suspensions and Pardons== | ==Record Suspensions and Pardons==<br> | ||
{{NoRecordSuspension|s. 162 [voyeurism]}} | {{NoRecordSuspension|s. 162 [voyeurism]}}<br> | ||
{{RecordSuspension|s. 266 [assault]}} | {{RecordSuspension|s. 266 [assault]}}<br> | ||
</nowiki> | </nowiki> | ||
Revision as of 21:20, 12 February 2019
This is my user account. Contact me at [email protected]. I am also on twitter @pjdostal.
Create:
MEDIA POLICY
Crown policy Manual
Some writing tools:
New Decisions
Templates
{{SummaryPending}}<br> {{LinkNeeded}}<br> {{DraftCharge}}<br> ==Record Suspensions and Pardons==<br> {{NoRecordSuspension|s. 162 [voyeurism]}}<br> {{RecordSuspension|s. 266 [assault]}}<br>
- Quote box
The court may allow video testimony if it is "appropriate" in "all the circumstances" including:
- the location and personal circumstances of the witness
- the costs that would be incurred if the witness had to be physically present; and
- the nature of the witness’ anticipated evidence.