Objections Cheatsheet: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
Line 20: Line 20:
* {{Box}} Evidence that generally is inadmissible
* {{Box}} Evidence that generally is inadmissible
** {{Box}} [[Hearsay]]
** {{Box}} [[Hearsay]]
** {{Box}} Asking witness for expert opinion
** {{Box}} Asking witness for expert opinion (see [[Expert Evidence]])
** {{Box}} Eliciting Privileged information (see [[Solicitor-Client Privilege]]; [[Informer Privilege]]; [[Litigation Privilege]])
** {{Box}} Eliciting Privileged information (see [[Solicitor-Client Privilege]]; [[Informer Privilege]]; [[Litigation Privilege]])
* {{Box}} Eliciting evidence outside of incident
* {{Box}} Eliciting evidence outside of incident

Revision as of 10:23, 15 February 2019

Generally

See also: Examinations-in-Chief and Cross-Examinations
  • Irrelevance (see Relevance)
  • Eliciting evidence supporting a Motion not before the Court
  • No foundation/Assumes facts not proven
  • Improperly Phrased Questions
    • Compound Question
    • Vague/Misleading question
    • Misquoting prior evidence/statement
  • Uncivil Questions
    • Asked and answered
    • Badgering, harassing witness
    • arguing with witness
    • Monologuing/Editorizating
  • Contradicting Collateral Facts (see Collateral Fact Rule)
  • Evidence that generally is inadmissible
  • Eliciting evidence outside of incident
  • Leading Question (on examination-in-chief only)

On Sexual Assault Cases

Prior Sexual History
  • Sexual contact with anyone, except contact at issue in trial
Sexual Assault Myths
  • Failure of the complainant to "fight back"
  • Failure of the complainant to "scream" or "call for help"
  • Failure of the complainant to report the assault in a timely manner


On Calling Counter-Evidence

  • Failure to confront opposing witness with counter-story (Rule in Browne v Dunn)