ITO Drafting and Search Execution Checklist: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{{ | {{LevelZero}} | ||
{{HeaderForms}} | |||
{{HeaderSearch}} | {{HeaderSearch}} | ||
==Drafting Practices== | ==Drafting Practices== | ||
Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! '''Content''' ! | ! '''Content''' | ||
! | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
Line 44: | Line 46: | ||
# {{Box}} Form 5.2 filled out and filed with the Justice of the Peace | # {{Box}} Form 5.2 filled out and filed with the Justice of the Peace | ||
# {{Box}} | # {{Box}} | ||
* Copy of warrant served on home-owner(s) and/or occupants. Copy left at location of search. | |||
* Document any damage done to the location of search. | |||
* Document any voluntary/consent searches performed. | |||
* Are all seized items recorded and request for Detention Order is made to Authorizing Justice. | |||
* Document the return of any seized items. | |||
* Any forms required by police policies are completed. | |||
* Should warrant not be executed, the warrant should be returned to the court. | |||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 70: | Line 79: | ||
* make the source of information clear for each statement of fact | * make the source of information clear for each statement of fact | ||
* if any evidence was obtained unconstitutionally, indicate what amount if any that evidence formed the basis of the warrant | * if any evidence was obtained unconstitutionally, indicate what amount if any that evidence formed the basis of the warrant | ||
* make sure to sign the document--> | * make sure to sign the document | ||
* {{Box}} Verify and initial a copy of warrant and ITO for the police file. | |||
* {{Box}} Does the wording of (a) offence, (b) place to be searched, and (c) items to be searched, for as found in ITO match wording found in warrant? | |||
* {{Box}} Does the warrant and ITO identify the person authorized to search. | |||
* Reliance on Confidential Sources | |||
** {{Box}} Detail history and reliability of confidential source | |||
** {{Box}} The wording in the ITO able to protect identity of source. | |||
* Grounds for Sealing Order (487.3): | |||
** {{Box}} protect on-going investigation (complete sealing with time limitation) | |||
** {{Box}} protect source (sealing of portions that would tend to reveal identity of source) | |||
** {{Box}} protect young individuals, witnesses, victims or accused (sealing of portions that would tend to reveal identity) | |||
** {{Box}} protect investigative technique (sealing of portions that would tend to reveal identity of source) | |||
** {{Box}} protect _________________ | |||
* {{Box}} Prepared a draft redaction of ITO in case of unsealing. | |||
<!-- | |||
; Execution of Search | |||
--> |
Revision as of 11:17, 4 March 2019
Drafting Practices
Content | |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
After Search | |
|
- identify the type of warrant sought as well as relevant sections.
- the judicial authority the request is made to (JP, Superior Court Justice, Provincial Court Judge)
- detail the identity of the affiant
- name, title, rank, length of employment,
- working group, mandate, my role in ground, type of offences investigated
- personal relevant experence
- sources of information
- databases relied upon
- personal sources (name, age, residence, criminal record)
- persons of interest (name, age, residences, charges, criminal record)
- property at issue: (if forfeiture or seizure)
- describe it (location, size, who is in possession of item, all information on ownership/owners)
- avoid over-breadth, vagueness
- location to be searched
- address, region, description of location
- summary of investigation
- previous applications
- reasons for any special requests (telewarrant, night-time search)
- conclusion / requested order
Tips for contents:
- make the source of information clear for each statement of fact
- if any evidence was obtained unconstitutionally, indicate what amount if any that evidence formed the basis of the warrant
- make sure to sign the document
- ☐ Verify and initial a copy of warrant and ITO for the police file.
- ☐ Does the wording of (a) offence, (b) place to be searched, and (c) items to be searched, for as found in ITO match wording found in warrant?
- ☐ Does the warrant and ITO identify the person authorized to search.
- Reliance on Confidential Sources
- ☐ Detail history and reliability of confidential source
- ☐ The wording in the ITO able to protect identity of source.
- Grounds for Sealing Order (487.3):
- ☐ protect on-going investigation (complete sealing with time limitation)
- ☐ protect source (sealing of portions that would tend to reveal identity of source)
- ☐ protect young individuals, witnesses, victims or accused (sealing of portions that would tend to reveal identity)
- ☐ protect investigative technique (sealing of portions that would tend to reveal identity of source)
- ☐ protect _________________
- ☐ Prepared a draft redaction of ITO in case of unsealing.