Arrest and Detention: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m 1 revision imported
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:


==See Also==
==See Also==
* [[Release and Attendance]]
* [[Compelling the Accused to Attend Court|Release and Attendance]]
* [[Screening Device]]
* [[Screening Device]]
<!--[[Investigation-related Procedure (Cases)]] I've blocked this out since all the case listings are far too out of date and incomplete and I have no intention of keeping up with the results of these types of cases-->
<!--[[Investigation-related Procedure (Cases)]] I've blocked this out since all the case listings are far too out of date and incomplete and I have no intention of keeping up with the results of these types of cases-->

Revision as of 21:25, 25 February 2018

Introduction

The police powers of detention and arrest are some of the most important powers available to a peace officer in their investigation of criminal activity. It is also some of the most invasive powers upon a person's liberty. This is a classic issue of procedural law that circumscribes the peace officers authority in these matters.

These chapters cover not only the powers of police to detain or arrest, but also the right a person has when the police engage in such conduct and remedies for breaches of those rights.

The transition from investigative detention to arrest and search is a fluid and dynamic process in situations such a traffic stop. It is not to be segmented into discrete parts.[1]

In general terms, the law should not "unduly hamper" the police in criminal investigations.[2]

State Agency
Arrest and detention by private security on the basis of committing a criminal offence and then delivery to the police does not amount to state conduct.[3]

  1. see R v Schrenk (C.A.), 2010 MBCA 38 (CanLII), 255 Man.R. (2d) 12
    R v Amofa (R.), 2011 ONCA 368 (CanLII), 282 O.A.C. 114 at para 19
  2. R v Hart, 2012 NLCA 61 (CanLII)
  3. R v Dell, 2005 ABCA 246 (CanLII)
    See also Charter Applications#State Agent

Topics

See Also