Jury Selection: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
Line 10: Line 10:
</ref>
</ref>


It is from the "panel" that a "petit jury" of usually 12 persons is selected. It is the "petit" jury that will be the group who are the finders-of-fact for a particular case.<Ref>
A jury selected to decide a case as the trier-of-fact is formally known as a "petit jury". It usually consists of 12 persons. The petit jury is selected at random from a "jury panel" who is a group of several hundred people selected from the "jury roll".<Ref>
R v Pan, [http://canlii.ca/t/gfm83 2014 ONSC 1393] (CanLII), at paras 34 to 37<Br>
R v Pan, [http://canlii.ca/t/gfm83 2014 ONSC 1393] (CanLII), at paras 34 to 37<Br>
</ref>
</ref>

Revision as of 09:11, 4 March 2018

General Principles

Every person charged with a crime has a right to a fair trial before an impartial tribunal. This right includes the right to an impartial jury.[1]

The right to a jury is protected by s. 1(d) which guarantees the right to be tried by an "independent and impartial tribunal" and s. 11(f) which guarantees the right to a jury that is "impartial and representative".[2]

A jury selected to decide a case as the trier-of-fact is formally known as a "petit jury". It usually consists of 12 persons. The petit jury is selected at random from a "jury panel" who is a group of several hundred people selected from the "jury roll".[3]

Any legal errors in jury selection will require a new trial.[4] This includes errors of law by the judge or unreasonable exercise of discretion in managing the selection process.[5]

  1. R v Sherratt, [1991] 1 SCR 509, 1991 CanLII 86 (SCC), (1991), 63 CCC (3d) 192 (S.C.C.), per L'Heureux-Dube J, at para 57
    R v Douse, 2009 CanLII 34990 at para 40
  2. Sherratt, supra at para 35
  3. R v Pan, 2014 ONSC 1393 (CanLII), at paras 34 to 37
  4. R v Barrow, 1987 CanLII 11 (SCC), [1987] 2 SCR 694 at p. 714
  5. R v Barnes 1999 CanLII 3782 (ON CA), (1999), 46 OR (3d) 116 at para 30, 138 CCC (3d) 500 (CA)

Topics