Spousal Immunity: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "{{quotation|" to "{{quotation1|" |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{LevelZero}}{{HeaderTestimony}} | {{LevelZero}}{{HeaderTestimony}} | ||
==General Principles== | ==General Principles== | ||
{{seealso| | {{seealso|Privilege}} | ||
==Spousal Competence== | |||
; Common law rule of spousal competence | |||
At common law a spouse of an accused is incompetent to testify except where the charge involves the person, liberty, or health, of the spouse.<ref> | At common law a spouse of an accused is incompetent to testify except where the charge involves the person, liberty, or health, of the spouse.<ref> | ||
''R v Hawkins'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1fr51 1996 CanLII 154] (SCC), [1996] 3 SCR 1043{{perSCC|Lamer CJ and Iacobucci J}}</ref> | ''R v Hawkins'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1fr51 1996 CanLII 154] (SCC), [1996] 3 SCR 1043{{perSCC|Lamer CJ and Iacobucci J}} | ||
</ref> | |||
Section 4(2) of the ''Canada Evidence Act'' | ; Evidence Act rule of spousal competence | ||
Section 4(2) of the ''Canada Evidence Act'' modifies the common law by stating that: | |||
{{quotation1| | {{quotation1| | ||
4<br> | 4<br> | ||
{{Removed|(1)}} | |||
; Spouse of accused | ; Spouse of accused | ||
(2) No person is incompetent, or uncompellable, to testify for the prosecution by reason only that they are married to the accused. | (2) No person is incompetent, or uncompellable, to testify for the prosecution by reason only that they are married to the accused. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
{{Removed|(3)}} | |||
(3) | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
(4) and (5) [Repealed, {{LegHistory10s|2015, c. 13}}, s. 52]<br> | (4) and (5) [Repealed, {{LegHistory10s|2015, c. 13}}, s. 52]<br> | ||
...<Br> | ...<Br> | ||
R.S., 1985, c. C-5, s. 4; R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.)}}, s. 17; {{LegHistory00s|2002, c. 1}}, s. 166; {{LegHistory10s|2014, c. 25}}, s. 34, c. 31, s. 27; {{LegHistory10s|2015, c. 13}}, s. 52. | {{Removed|(6)}} | ||
R.S., 1985, c. C-5, s. 4; | |||
R.S., {{LegHistory80s|1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.)}}, s. 17; | |||
{{LegHistory00s|2002, c. 1}}, s. 166; | |||
{{LegHistory10s|2014, c. 25}}, s. 34, c. 31, s. 27; | |||
{{LegHistory10s|2015, c. 13}}, s. 52. | |||
|[http://canlii.ca/t/52hk6#sec4 CEA] | |[http://canlii.ca/t/52hk6#sec4 CEA] | ||
}} | }} | ||
; Competence for Defence | ; Competence for Defence | ||
Revision as of 13:37, 5 March 2020
General Principles
Spousal Competence
- Common law rule of spousal competence
At common law a spouse of an accused is incompetent to testify except where the charge involves the person, liberty, or health, of the spouse.[1]
- Evidence Act rule of spousal competence
Section 4(2) of the Canada Evidence Act modifies the common law by stating that:
4
[omitted (1)]
- Spouse of accused
(2) No person is incompetent, or uncompellable, to testify for the prosecution by reason only that they are married to the accused.
[omitted (3)]
(4) and (5) [Repealed, 2015, c. 13, s. 52]
...
[omitted (6)]
R.S., 1985, c. C-5, s. 4; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 17; 2002, c. 1, s. 166; 2014, c. 25, s. 34, c. 31, s. 27; 2015, c. 13, s. 52.– CEA
- Competence for Defence
- Accused and spouse
4 (1) Every person charged with an offence, and, except as otherwise provided in this section, the wife or husband, as the case may be, of the person so charged, is a competent witness for the defence, whether the person so charged is charged solely or jointly with any other person.
...
R.S., 1985, c. C-5, s. 4; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 17; 2002, c. 1, s. 166; 2014, c. 25, s. 34, c. 31, s. 27; 2015, c. 13, s. 52.– CEA
- ↑ R v Hawkins, 1996 CanLII 154 (SCC), [1996] 3 SCR 1043, per Lamer CJ and Iacobucci J
Spousal Privilege
Spousal privilege is a class protection of certain communications between husband and wife. It is a protection that is separate and apart from spousal competency.[1]
A spouse who is found to be competent and compellable may still invoke privilege to protect their communications.[2]
This class of privilege does not exist at common law, but rather was created by way of s. 4(3) of the Evidence Act, which states:
4 (3) No husband is compellable to disclose any communication made to him by his wife during their marriage, and no wife is compellable to disclose any communication made to her by her husband during their marriage.
– CEA
Third parties may "testify to communications between husband and wife that were overheard, intercepted, or otherwise discovered".[3]
- ↑ See McWilliams' Canadian Criminal Evidence, 4th ed., vol. 1, looseleaf (Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book, 2010) at para 13:40.10
- ↑ R v Zylstra, 1995 CanLII 893 (ON CA), per curiam
- ↑ R v RRW (No. 2), 2010 NLTD 137 (CanLII), per Goodridge J citing McWilliams’ at para 13:40.50