From Criminal Law Notebook
|
|
| Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| {{reflist|2}} | | {{reflist|2}} |
|
| |
|
| ==Section 24(2)== | | ==Section 24(2) of the Charter== |
| {{seealso|Discretionary Exclusion of Evidence}} | | {{seealso|Discretionary Exclusion of Evidence}} |
|
| |
|
| ==See Also== | | ==See Also== |
| * [[Costs]] | | * [[Costs]] |
Revision as of 18:43, 3 July 2020
Section 24(1) of the Charter
- See also: Stay of Proceedings
The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.[1]
Where there is an error in principle, relies on irrelevant factors, or is unreasonable, the appellate court may intervene.[2]
- ↑
R. v Simpson, 1995 CanLII 120 (SCC), [1995] 1 SCR 449 rev’g (1994), 1994 CanLII 4528 (NL CA), 117 Nfld & PEIR 110 at paras. 67-9, 88 CCC (3d) 377 (CA)(complete citation pending)
- ↑
R. v Babos, 2014 SCC 16 at paras. 48-9, [2014] 1 SCR 309(complete citation pending)
Section 24(2) of the Charter
- See also: Discretionary Exclusion of Evidence
See Also
