Charter Remedies: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.<ref> | The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Simpson|1frmt|1995 CanLII 120 (SCC)|, [1995] 1 SCR 449 rev’g (1994), [http://canlii.ca/t/1nplw 1994 CanLII 4528 (NL CA)], 117 Nfld & PEIR 110}}{{atsL||67 to 69}} (CCC)<br> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Where there is an error in principle, relies on irrelevant factors, or is unreasonable, the appellate court may intervene.<Ref> | Where there is an error in principle, relies on irrelevant factors, or is unreasonable, the appellate court may intervene.<Ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Babos|g36g4|2014 SCC 16 (CanLII)|, [2014] 1 SCR 309}}{{perSCC|Moldaver J}}{{atsL|g36g4|48| to 49}} | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
; Unreasonable Detention | ; Unreasonable Detention | ||
Where an officer detains someone for longer than what is permitted under s. 503(1)(a), the remedies include sentence credit at sentencing.<ref> | Where an officer detains someone for longer than what is permitted under s. 503(1)(a), the remedies include sentence credit at sentencing.<ref> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|B(S)||2014 ONCA 527 (CanLII)|121 OR (3d) 145}}{{ | {{CanLIIRP|B(S)|g7x2k|2014 ONCA 527 (CanLII)|121 OR (3d) 145}}{{perONCA|Rosenberg JA}}{{AtL|g7x2k|13}}<br> | ||
{{CanLIIRP|Rashid||2010 ONCA 591 (CanLII)|259 CCC (3d) 289}}{{AtsL||6|-7}}<br> | {{CanLIIRP|Rashid|2ckc7|2010 ONCA 591 (CanLII)|259 CCC (3d) 289}}{{TheCourtONCA}}{{AtsL|2ckc7|6|-7}}<br> | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
Revision as of 12:18, 25 October 2020
Section 24(1) of the Charter
The choice of remedy upon violation of a constitutional provision is entitled to discretion.[1]
Where there is an error in principle, relies on irrelevant factors, or is unreasonable, the appellate court may intervene.[2]
- Unreasonable Detention
Where an officer detains someone for longer than what is permitted under s. 503(1)(a), the remedies include sentence credit at sentencing.[3]
- ↑
R v Simpson, 1995 CanLII 120 (SCC), , [1995] 1 SCR 449 rev’g (1994), 1994 CanLII 4528 (NL CA), 117 Nfld & PEIR 110, at to 69 paras 67 to 69{{{3}}} (CCC)
- ↑ R v Babos, 2014 SCC 16 (CanLII), , [2014] 1 SCR 309, per Moldaver J, at paras 48 to 49
- ↑
R v B(S), 2014 ONCA 527 (CanLII), 121 OR (3d) 145, per Rosenberg JA, at para 13
R v Rashid, 2010 ONCA 591 (CanLII), 259 CCC (3d) 289, per curiam, at paras 6-7