Seizure of Property: Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\', \[http\:\/\/canlii\.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) ([1-2][0-9]{3} [BASMOQNP][CBKNCSL][A-Z]+ [0-9]+\] \(CanLII\))\{" to "{{CanLIIR|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{"
m Text replacement - "] (CanLII) (CanLII)" to " (CanLII)"
Line 16: Line 16:


Where the police do not seize property and merely make observations, they may still give evidence regarding the items and are not violating the "best evidence rule".<ref>
Where the police do not seize property and merely make observations, they may still give evidence regarding the items and are not violating the "best evidence rule".<ref>
{{CanLIIR|Pham|52mw|1999 BCCA 571] (CanLII) (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Braidwood JA}}<br>
{{CanLIIR|Pham|52mw|1999 BCCA 571 (CanLII)}}{{perBCCA|Braidwood JA}}<br>
</ref>
</ref>



Revision as of 20:04, 27 January 2021

Introduction

Property can be seized and then detain by police under the Code in several ways.

Detention can occur as:

For any warrantless seizure of property, the burden is upon the Crown to prove that it did not violate s. 8 of the Charter. To put the burden on the accused "ignores the reality that the Crown is in the best position to know how and why the seizure took place"[1]

Where the police do not seize property and merely make observations, they may still give evidence regarding the items and are not violating the "best evidence rule".[2]

  1. R v Hass, 2005 CanLII 26440 (ON CA), per Goudge JA, at para 37
  2. R v Pham, 1999 BCCA 571 (CanLII), per Braidwood JA

Topics

General Seizure Powers

Detention, Access, Disposal of Things Seized Under Section 489 or 487.11

Other Seizure and Detention Powers

See Also