Jury Selection: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]*)\'\', \[http\:\/\/canlii\.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9_]+) ([1-2][0-9]{3} CanLII [0-9]+)\] (\([A-Z]+\)){" to "{{CanLIIR|$1|$2|$3 $4}}{" |
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\'\, \[http\:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9]+) ([1-2][0-9]+ CanLII [0-9]+)\] \(SCC\)\, (\[[0-9]+\] [0-9]+ SCR [0-9]+)\{" to "{{CanLIIR|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{" |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Any legal errors in jury selection will require a new trial.<ReF> | Any legal errors in jury selection will require a new trial.<ReF>{{CanLIIR|Barrow|1ftjh|1987 CanLII 11 (CanLII)}}{{TheCourt}}{{atp|714}}</ref> | ||
This includes errors of law by the judge or unreasonable exercise of discretion in managing the selection process.<ReF> | This includes errors of law by the judge or unreasonable exercise of discretion in managing the selection process.<ReF> | ||
''R v Barnes'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1f9r8 1999 CanLII 3782] (ON CA), (1999), 46 OR (3d) 116{{atL|1f9r8|30}}, 138 CCC (3d) 500 (CA){{perONCA|Moldaver JA}}</ref> | ''R v Barnes'', [http://canlii.ca/t/1f9r8 1999 CanLII 3782] (ON CA), (1999), 46 OR (3d) 116{{atL|1f9r8|30}}, 138 CCC (3d) 500 (CA){{perONCA|Moldaver JA}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 29 January 2021
- < Procedure and Practice
- < Trials
- < Juries
- < Jury Selection
General Principles
Every person charged with a crime has a right to a fair trial before an impartial tribunal. This right includes the right to an impartial jury.[1]
The right to a jury is protected by s. 1(d) which guarantees the right to be tried by an "independent and impartial tribunal" and s. 11(f) which guarantees the right to a jury that is "impartial and representative".[2]
A jury selected to decide a case as the trier-of-fact is formally known as a "petit jury". It usually consists of 12 persons. The petit jury is selected at random from a "jury panel" who is a group of several hundred people selected from the "jury roll".[3]
Any legal errors in jury selection will require a new trial.[4] This includes errors of law by the judge or unreasonable exercise of discretion in managing the selection process.[5]
- ↑
R v Sherratt, [1991] 1 SCR 509, 1991 CanLII 86 (SCC), (1991), 63 CCC (3d) 192 (SCC), per L'Heureux-Dube J, at para 57
R v Douse, 2009 CanLII 34990 (ONSC), per Durno J, at para 40
- ↑
Sherratt, supra, at para 35
- ↑
R v Pan, 2014 ONSC 1393 (CanLII), per Boswell J, at paras 34 to 37
- ↑ R v Barrow, 1987 CanLII 11 (CanLII), per curiam, at p. 714
- ↑ R v Barnes, 1999 CanLII 3782 (ON CA), (1999), 46 OR (3d) 116, at para 30, 138 CCC (3d) 500 (CA), per Moldaver JA