Identity (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\'\,<br> \[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-z0-9]+) ([0-9]+ [A-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \([a-zA-Z]+\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{" |
m Text replacement - "\'\'R v ([a-zA-Z]+)\'\',<br> \[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9]+) ([0-9]{4} [A-Z]{4} [0-9]+)\] \(CanLII\)\{" to "{{CanLIIR-S|$1|$2|$3 (CanLII)}}{" |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
{{TCase|R v L.(W.M),<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bp5w 2010 BCCA 355] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Groberman J}} || conviction upheld -- D argued that prior encounter by Police affected ID}} | {{TCase|R v L.(W.M),<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/2bp5w 2010 BCCA 355] (CanLII){{perBCCA|Groberman J}} || conviction upheld -- D argued that prior encounter by Police affected ID}} | ||
{{TCase| | {{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Thompson|2680h|2009 NSPC 51 (CanLII)}}{{perNSPC|Tax J}} || acquitted}} | ||
{{TCase| | {{TCase|{{CanLIIR-S|Martin|1vgv5|2007 NSCA 121 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Oland JA}} | conviction| }} | ||
{{TCase| | {{TCase| {{CanLIIR-S|Hill|1l8g1|2005 NSCA 108 (CanLII)}}{{perNSCA|Hamilton JA}} || }} | ||
{{TCase| ''R v Goulart-Nelson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1hz5s 2004 CanLII 32077] (Ont.C.A.){{TheCourtONCA}} | | }} | {{TCase| ''R v Goulart-Nelson'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1hz5s 2004 CanLII 32077] (Ont.C.A.){{TheCourtONCA}} | | }} |
Revision as of 15:26, 6 February 2021
- < Criminal Law
- < Cases
Identification
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Banish, 2012 ABPC 350 (CanLII), per Fraser J | ID in sexual assault case established by proof of IP and email address source and vehicle ownership. Victim could not visually ID assailant. | |
R v Oliver, 2012 CanLII 38957 (NL SCTD), per Adams J |
acquitted | |
R v Wheyee, 2012 ABPC 35 (CanLII), per Fradsham J | acquitted | home invasion -- acquitted- thorough canvas of evidence |
R v Colwell, 2011 ONCJ 611 (CanLII), per Reinhardt J | acquitted | assault |
R v Smith, 2011 BCCA 362 (CanLII), per Neilson JA | guilty | |
R v Flynn, 2011 CanLII 77299 (NL PC), per Orr J |
acquitted | dog tracking |
R v McNaughton, 2011 ABPC 356 (CanLII), per Lamoureux J | acquitted | drug trafficking -- no line up made |
R v Wilband, 2011 ABPC 298 (CanLII), per Fraser J | convicted | bank robbery |
R v Benmore, 2011 CanLII 77762 (NL PC), per Flynn J |
guilty | attempted case |
R v Pierce, 2011 BCCA 485 (CanLII), per Smith J | conviction upheld | |
R v Al-Kisadi, 2011 ONSC 6412 (CanLII), per Kelly J |
acquitted | |
R v John, 2010 ONSC 6085 (CanLII), per Code J | acquitted | |
R v T.(R.), 2010 ONCJ 289 (CanLII), per Barnes J |
||
R v L.(W.M), 2010 BCCA 355 (CanLII), per Groberman J |
conviction upheld -- D argued that prior encounter by Police affected ID | |
R v Thompson, 2009 NSPC 51 (CanLII), per Tax J | acquitted | |
R v Martin, 2007 NSCA 121 (CanLII), per Oland JA | conviction | |
R v Hill, 2005 NSCA 108 (CanLII), per Hamilton JA | ||
R v Goulart-Nelson, 2004 CanLII 32077 (Ont.C.A.), per curiam |
||
R v Zurowski, 2003 ABCA 315 (CanLII), per McClung JA (2:1) | acquitted on appeal to SCC | |
R v Williams [2003] OJ No 4095, 2003 CanLII 21327 (ON CA), per curiam |
||
R v Hibbert, 2002 SCC 39 (CanLII), per Arbour J | ||
R v Dhillon (2002), 166 CCC (3d) 262 (ONCA), 2002 CanLII 41540 (ONCA), per Laskin and Goudge JJA |
acquitted | witness shown only one photo |
R v Thompson 2000 CanLII 5746 (ON C.A.), per Moldaver and MacPherson JJA |
||
R v Wristen 1999 CanLII 3824 (ON C.A.), per Laskin and Rosenberg JA |
||
R v Field 1999 BCCA 382 (CanLII), (1999), 126 BCAC 103{, per Esson JA |
||
R v Reitsma, 1998 CanLII 825 (SCC), [1998] 1 SCR 769, rev’g (1997), 125 CCC (3d) 1 (BCCA) |
||
R v Vu [1998] BCJ No. 986 1998 CanLII 6791 (BCSC), per Romilly J |
||
R v Vu [1997] BCJ No. 756 1997 CanLII 2864 (BCCA), per Hall JA |
||
R v Tat and Long (1997) 117 CCC (3d) 481 1997 CanLII 2234 (ONCA), per Doherty JA |
||
R v Miaponoose, 1996 CanLII 1268 (ONCA), per Charron JA |
||
R v Tam (1995), 1995 CanLII 1805 (BC CA), 100 CCC (3d) 196 (BCCA), per Prowse JA |
||
R v Fengstad 1994 CanLII 240 (BC C.A.), (1994), 27 C.R. (4th) 383 (BCCA), per curiam |
||
R v Dilling, 1993 CanLII 1943 (BCCA), per Goldie JA |
||
R v Izzard 1990 CanLII 11055 (ON CA), [1990] 54 CCC (3d) 252, per Morden JA |
||
R v Quercia, 1990 CanLII 2595 (ONCA), per Doherty JA |
||
R v Hang 1990 CanLII 8 (BCCA), (1990), 55 CCC (3d) 195 (BCCA), per curiam |
||
R v Virk (1983), 33 C.R. (3d) 378 (BCCA) (*no CanLII links) |
||
R v Faryna [1982] 3 CCC (3d) 58, 1982 CanLII 3796 (MB CA), per Huband JA (2:1) |
||
R v Spatola, 1970 CanLII 390 (ON CA), [1970] 3 O.R. 74-84, per Laskin JA (2:1) |
duty to direct jury on frailties of ID | |
R v Howarth (1970), 1 CCC (2d) 546 (Ont.C.A.), 1970 CanLII 1065 (ON CA), per Gale CJ |
||
R v Smith 1952 CanLII 116 (ON CA), [1952] 103 CCC 58 (Ont. CA), per MacKay JA |
||
R v Smierciak [1947] 2 DLR 156, 1946 CanLII 331 (ON CA), per Laidlaw JA |
Voice identification
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Badgerow, 2010 ONSC 937 (CanLII), per Taylor J |
Line-up ID
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Bear, 2012 ABCA 85 (CanLII), per curiam | lineup ID sufficient even thought witness ID’d at 70-80% accuracy stating that it “maybe” was the accused | |
R v Lussier, 1998 CanLII 4143 (BCCA), per MacKenzie JA |
line-up conducted, accused ID'd by complainant sometime later and admitted she was not sure | |
R v Atfield 1983 ABCA 44 (CanLII), [1983] AJ No 870, per Belzil JA |
some time after sexual assault, accused was ID'd in a line-up by a "fleeting glance" eye-witness. The line up process used by the police in that case as "unacceptable, botched and farcical". |
Out of Court ID
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Basi, 2008 ONCJ 469 (CanLII), per Bovard J | acquitted | |
R v Moran, 2008 SKPC 33 (CanLII), per Hinds J | ||
R v Meier, 2009 SKPC 29 (CanLII), per Morgan J | ||
R v Bigsky, 2006 SKCA 145 (CanLII), per Jackson JA | ||
R v Coutu et al., 2008 MBCA 151 (CanLII), per Freedman JA |
||
R v Goran, 2008 ONCA 195 (CanLII), per Blair JA | ||
R v Jones, 2005 CanLII 60168 (MBPC), per Kopstein J |
||
R v Delorme, 2004 SKPC 130 (CanLII), per Kolenick J |
ID by Constable
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Schmidt, 2012 BCPC 247 (CanLII), per Woods J | convicted | based on recognition evidence |
R v Cranham, 2012 ONCA 457 (CanLII), per curiam | conviction quashed | |
R v Jerry Lee Dun, 2006 PESCAD 19 (CanLII), per Mitchell CJ | new trial | |
R v Tash, 2011 ONSC 5191 (CanLII), per Belobaba J | one officer sees person throw object away, radios second officer who sees accused matching description. Good opportunity to observe. |
Of a Driver
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Ryan, 2011 NLCA 53 (CanLII), per Hoegg JA | convicted | - |
R v Corsor, 2011 BCPC 212 (CanLII), per Raven J | acquittal | |
R v Tarcisyo, 2010 SKQB 234 (CanLII), per Gabrielson J | conviction | pull over-- driver pulls away after brief interaction with police |
R v Desnomie, 2010 SKCA 64 (CanLII), [2010] S.J. No. 273, per Gerwing JA |
||
R v Horkoff, 2010 SKCA 79 (CanLII), [2010] S.J. No. 332, per Richards JA |
conviction | |
R v Armbruster, 2010 SKCA 25 (CanLII), [2010] 4 W.W.R. 575, per Richards JA |
||
R v Weigel, 2008 SKCA 122 (CanLII), [2008] S.J. No. 603, per Richards JA |
||
R v Roppel, 2006 ONCJ 445(*no CanLII links) |
guilty | officer chasing car, than foot chase. Came within an arms-length of accused. |
R v Cover (2004), 2004 CarswellOnt 6224 (ONSC)(*no CanLII links) |
guilty | officer giving chase, made eye-contact while near driver's window, had seen driver several times in area, familiar with accused by photo on wanted bulletin. Officer ID'd accused shortly after arrest |
Video tape ID
Case Name | Result | Summary |
---|---|---|
R v Leaney, [1989] 2 SCR 393 1989 CanLII 28 (SCC), per McLachlin J |