Mandamus, Certiorari, and Prohibition (Cases): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|{{CanLIIRP-S|Faber|gcr90|1987 CanLII 6849 (QC CS)| (1987), 38 CCC (3d) 49 (Que. Sup. Ct.)}}{{perQCCS|Boilard J}} ||The Applicant sought to compel the attorney general to withdraw a stay of proceedings against someone charged with murder | |{{CanLIIRP-S|Faber|gcr90|1987 CanLII 6849 (QC CS)| (1987), 38 CCC (3d) 49 (Que. Sup. Ct.)}}{{perQCCS|Boilard J}} ||The Applicant sought to compel the attorney general to withdraw a stay of proceedings against someone charged with murder | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{ | |{{CanLIIRP-S|Coughlan|htvj8|1969 CanLII 949 (AB QB)| (1969), [1970] 3 CCC 61 (Alta. T.D.)}}{{perABQB|Riley J}} ||The Applicant sought to compel a magistrate to issue a summons or warrant who refused to do so after a hearing. The reviewing judge refused to order the writ as it was a discretionary decision of the magistrate. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 08:05, 23 February 2021
| Case Name | Summary |
|---|---|
| R v Faber, 1987 CanLII 6849 (QC CS), (1987), 38 CCC (3d) 49 (Que. Sup. Ct.), per Boilard J |
The Applicant sought to compel the attorney general to withdraw a stay of proceedings against someone charged with murder |
| R v Coughlan, 1969 CanLII 949 (AB QB), (1969), [1970] 3 CCC 61 (Alta. T.D.), per Riley J |
The Applicant sought to compel a magistrate to issue a summons or warrant who refused to do so after a hearing. The reviewing judge refused to order the writ as it was a discretionary decision of the magistrate. |