Warrantless Searches (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Brown|fnmv1|2011 ONSC 6250 (CanLII)}}|| -||N||N|| vehicle pulled over after chase; alleged detained by police pursuit
|{{CanLIIR-S|Brown|fnmv1|2011 ONSC 6250 (CanLII)}}|| -||N||N|| vehicle pulled over after chase; alleged detained by police pursuit
|-
|-
| ''R v Ryan'',<br>2010 NJ No. 173|| N || Y || Y || breath test
| {{CanLIIR-SN|Ryan|2010 NJ No. 173}}|| N || Y || Y || breath test
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|GC|27xmm|2010 NSPC 10 (CanLII)}}|| N|| N||N || while executing search warrant, pat-down search of accused for weapons; finds drugs
|{{CanLIIR-S|GC|27xmm|2010 NSPC 10 (CanLII)}}|| N|| N||N || while executing search warrant, pat-down search of accused for weapons; finds drugs
|-
|-
|''R v Cunsolo'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/26ghq 2009 CanLII 60775] (ON S.C.) ||N||Y||N|| premature arrest of fraudster
|{{CanLIIR-S|Cunsolo|26ghq|2009 CanLII 60775 (ONSC)}} ||N||Y||N|| premature arrest of fraudster
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|NO|22ms4|2009 ABCA 75 (CanLII)}}||N||Y||Y|| police observe hand-to-hand, search accused, find drugs
|{{CanLIIR-S|NO|22ms4|2009 ABCA 75 (CanLII)}}||N||Y||Y|| police observe hand-to-hand, search accused, find drugs
Line 39: Line 39:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Sepulveda|1l13l|2005 BCPC 236 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| pat-down search of woman known to police; accused spit on officer
|{{CanLIIR-S|Sepulveda|1l13l|2005 BCPC 236 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N|| pat-down search of woman known to police; accused spit on officer
|-
|-
|''R v KW'',<br>2004 O.J. No.5327 (OCJ)  
|{{CanLIIR-SN|KW|2004 O.J. No.5327 (OCJ)}}
|| || Y || || police officers had no grounds to suspect that the accused was connected to any criminal activity; he “must be doing something” because of the very general surrounding circumstances.
|| || Y || || police officers had no grounds to suspect that the accused was connected to any criminal activity; he “must be doing something” because of the very general surrounding circumstances.
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Power|56v9|2003 SKQB 334 (CanLII)}}|| || || ||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Power|56v9|2003 SKQB 334 (CanLII)}}|| || || ||
|-
|-
|''R v Burke'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1npm7 1997 CanLII 10867] (NL C.A.)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Burke|1npm7|1997 CanLII 10867 (NL C.A.)}}
||N||N||N|| overturn s.9 breach; officer had sufficient reason to pull over accused
||N||N||N|| overturn s.9 breach; officer had sufficient reason to pull over accused
|}
|}


* {{CanLIIRP|Dauda|fphng|2011 ONCJ 799 (CanLII)||| s.8 and 9 violation, exlcuded under 24(2); seen avoiding police, threw something away; found <4 g cocaine
* {{CanLIIRP|Dauda|fphng|2011 ONCJ 799 (CanLII)}||| s.8 and 9 violation, exlcuded under 24(2); seen avoiding police, threw something away; found <4 g cocaine


==Vehicle Stops==
==Vehicle Stops==
Line 61: Line 61:
| {{CanLIIR-S|McCammon|frj67|2012 MBQB 154 (CanLII)}}|| - ||Y || Y || evidence excluded
| {{CanLIIR-S|McCammon|frj67|2012 MBQB 154 (CanLII)}}|| - ||Y || Y || evidence excluded
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Blazevic|27c82|2010 ONSC 137 (CanLII)|, [2010] OJ. No 67 || Y || ? || Y || Officers investigating impaired driving by pulling accused over. They find out he is violating conditions and arrest him. They search his car and find 1.46 lb of marijuana. Drugs are excluded.
| {{CanLIIRP-S|Blazevic|27c82|2010 ONSC 137 (CanLII)|, [2010] OJ. No 67}} || Y || ? || Y || Officers investigating impaired driving by pulling accused over. They find out he is violating conditions and arrest him. They search his car and find 1.46 lb of marijuana. Drugs are excluded.
|-
|-
|''R v Reddy'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/27gb1 2010 BCCA 11] (CanLII), [2010] BCJ No 49 || Y || Y || Y|| Officers see accused sitting in someone else's car parked in front of a drug house. They arrest him on suspicion of breaching conditions and search car and his jacket. Handguns were found. All evidence seized excluded.
|{{CanLIIRP-S|Reddy|27gb1|2010 BCCA 11 (CanLII)|, [2010] BCJ No 49}} || Y || Y || Y|| Officers see accused sitting in someone else's car parked in front of a drug house. They arrest him on suspicion of breaching conditions and search car and his jacket. Handguns were found. All evidence seized excluded.
|}
|}


Line 71: Line 71:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !!Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !!Summary
|-
|-
|''R v Rose'',<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/fpmdv2012 ONSC 350] (CanLII)|| ?||Y||Y|| arrested accused based on finding marijuana on co-accused.
|{{CanLIIR-S|Rose|fpmdv2012 ONSC 350 (CanLII)}}|| ?||Y||Y|| arrested accused based on finding marijuana on co-accused.
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIR-S|Osolky|25sqz|2009 ONCJ 445 (CanLII)}}|| Y || N || Y || patdown search; evidence excluded
| {{CanLIIR-S|Osolky|25sqz|2009 ONCJ 445 (CanLII)}}|| Y || N || Y || patdown search; evidence excluded
Line 77: Line 77:
|{{CanLIIR-S|F(CJ)|1wkt1|2008 SKPC 51 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N||officer responds to mischief complaint; sees youths; accused run away; searches him and finds weapon;
|{{CanLIIR-S|F(CJ)|1wkt1|2008 SKPC 51 (CanLII)}}|| N||N||N||officer responds to mischief complaint; sees youths; accused run away; searches him and finds weapon;
|-
|-
|''R v Ferdinand'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1hkkx 2004 CanLII 5854] (ON SC), 2004 O.J. No. 3209 (SCJ)  
|{{CanLIIRP-S|Ferdinand|1hkkx|2004 CanLII 5854 (ON SC)|, 2004 O.J. No. 3209 (SCJ)}}
|| Y || || Y ||officer’s hunch about the actions of the accused, (based on his “Spidey sense,”) was insufficient basis
|| Y || || Y ||officer’s hunch about the actions of the accused, (based on his “Spidey sense,”) was insufficient basis
|}
|}
Line 86: Line 86:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !!Evidence at issue !!Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !!Evidence at issue !!Summary
|-
|-
|''R v Sandhu'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/264g3 2009 CanLII 55322] (ON SC)|| Y|| ?|| Y|| 205 kg of cocaine || Warrantless seizure from a truck was "egregious"
|{{CanLIIR-S|Sandhu|264g3|2009 CanLII 55322 (ON SC)}}|| Y|| ?|| Y|| 205 kg of cocaine || Warrantless seizure from a truck was "egregious"
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Turpin|fr8tt|2012 SKCA 50 (CanLII)}}||Y||Y||Y|| drugs||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Turpin|fr8tt|2012 SKCA 50 (CanLII)}}||Y||Y||Y|| drugs||
Line 108: Line 108:
| {{CanLIIR-S|TTH|1q28c|2006 ABPC 320 (CanLII)}}|| Y || - || N ||  ||search vehicle based on unsafe driving and suspicious comments from driver
| {{CanLIIR-S|TTH|1q28c|2006 ABPC 320 (CanLII)}}|| Y || - || N ||  ||search vehicle based on unsafe driving and suspicious comments from driver
|-
|-
|''R v Batzer'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1lm3g 2005 CanLII 33026] (ON C.A.) ||Y||N||Y||  ||search of glovebox of car after detaining accused on rough description
|{{CanLIIR-S|Batzer|1lm3g|2005 CanLII 33026 (ON C.A.)}} ||Y||N||Y||  ||search of glovebox of car after detaining accused on rough description
|-
|-
|''R v Cox'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1lrhg 1999 CanLII 13119] (NB C.A.)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Cox|1lrhg|1999 CanLII 13119 (NB C.A.)}}
||Y||Y||Y||  ||plainclothes officer searched car at roadblock due to smell of "bulk" tobacco
||Y||Y||Y||  ||plainclothes officer searched car at roadblock due to smell of "bulk" tobacco
|-
|-
| ''R v Keshane'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1mdpr 1995 CanLII 4054] (SKCA) || Y || - || N ||  ||warrantless search of a trunk of accused's car
|{{CanLIIR-S|Keshane|1mdpr|1995 CanLII 4054 (SKCA)}} || Y || - || N ||  ||warrantless search of a trunk of accused's car
|-
|-
| R v D. (I.D.),<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/1pfnf 1987 CanLII 206] (SKCA) || Y|| - || ? || ||search of vehicle on spotting it stopped in ditch and detect smell of alcohol
|{{CanLIIRP-S|D(ID)|1pfnf|1987 CanLII 206 (SKCA)}} || Y|| - || ? || ||search of vehicle on spotting it stopped in ditch and detect smell of alcohol
|}
|}


Line 139: Line 139:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Webster|21ls8|2008 BCCA 458 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Webster|21ls8|2008 BCCA 458 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Favorite'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1wb3h 2008 CanLII 13364] ||N||N||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Favorite|1wb3h|2008 CanLII 13364}} ||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Charles'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1t13k 2007 CanLII 39760] (ON SC) ||Y||?||Y||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Charles|1t13k|2007 CanLII 39760 (ON SC)}} ||Y||?||Y||
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Huynh|1m3cb|2005 ABPC 238 (CanLII)}}||N ||-||-|| no s.8 breach found
|{{CanLIIR-S|Huynh|1m3cb|2005 ABPC 238 (CanLII)}}||N ||-||-|| no s.8 breach found
|-
|-
|''R v Calderon'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1hpvs 2004 CanLII 7569] ||Y||Y||Y||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Calderon|1hpvs 2004 CanLII 7569}} ||Y||Y||Y||
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ladouceur|5k1p|2002 SKCA 73 (CanLII)}}||?||Y||Y||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ladouceur|5k1p|2002 SKCA 73 (CanLII)}}||?||Y||Y||
Line 153: Line 153:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Power|56v9|2003 SKQB 334 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Power|56v9|2003 SKQB 334 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|R v Yan & Chan,<br>  [http://canlii.ca/t/5dj9 2002 BCPC 574] (CanLII)||Y||-||Y|| pull over on basis of broad search for cat burglar; smells marijuana from car ; breach of s. 8 found -- evidence excluded
|{{CanLIIR-S|Yan & Chan|5dj9|2002 BCPC 574 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||Y|| pull over on basis of broad search for cat burglar; smells marijuana from car ; breach of s. 8 found -- evidence excluded
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Duong|4z0q|2002 BCCA 43 (CanLII)}}|| N || || || no s.8 breach -- smell of marijuana coming out front door of house
|{{CanLIIR-S|Duong|4z0q|2002 BCCA 43 (CanLII)}}|| N || || || no s.8 breach -- smell of marijuana coming out front door of house
Line 159: Line 159:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Zagar|5rc4|1998 ABPC 59 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||Y||  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Zagar|5rc4|1998 ABPC 59 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||Y||  
|-
|-
|''R v Lawrence'',<br> [1994] O.J. No. 3272 {{NOCANLII}} || N||N||N|| smell fresh burnt marijuana; allowed search down pants of accused
|{{CanLIIR-SN|Lawrence| [1994] O.J. No. 3272}} || N||N||N|| smell fresh burnt marijuana; allowed search down pants of accused
|-
|-
|''R v Iturriaga'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1dblb 1993 CanLII 2517] (BC CA) || Y||?||Y||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Iturriaga|1dblb|1993 CanLII 2517 (BC CA)}} || Y||?||Y||
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 170: Line 170:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !! Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|-
|''Hewlett v R'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fsdd1 2012 CanLII 46405] (NL SCTD) ||N||-||N|| search warrant
|{{CanLIIR-S|Hewlett|fsdd1|2012 CanLII 46405 (NL SCTD)}} ||N||-||N|| search warrant
|-
|-
|R v Gorman and Gorman,<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/fs99l 2012 ONSC 4605] (CanLII) ||N||-||N|| search warrant
|{{CanLIIR-S|Gorman and Gorman|fs99l|2012 ONSC 4605 (CanLII)}} ||N||-||N|| search warrant
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Franko|fr8f7|2012 ABQB 282 (CanLII)}}||N||-||N|| confidential source reports drug dealers activities
|{{CanLIIR-S|Franko|fr8f7|2012 ABQB 282 (CanLII)}}||N||-||N|| confidential source reports drug dealers activities
Line 190: Line 190:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Safi|29m7q|2010 ABCA 151 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Safi|29m7q|2010 ABCA 151 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Raphael'',<br> [2010] O.J. No. 5916, 2010 ONSC 5709  
|{{CanLIIR-SN|Raphael| [2010] O.J. No. 5916, 2010 ONSC 5709 }}
||Y||Y||Y||
||Y||Y||Y||
|-
|-
|Bjornson,  <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/27522 2009 BCSC 1779] (CanLII)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Bjornson|27522|2009 BCSC 1779 (CanLII)}}
||N||N||N||  
||N||N||N||  
|-
|-
Line 204: Line 204:
|{{CanLIIR-S|McCallum|1nw48|2006 SKQB 287 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|McCallum|1nw48|2006 SKQB 287 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|''Goodine v R'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1q247 2006 NBCA 109] (CanLII)|| N||?||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Goodine|1q247|2006 NBCA 109 (CanLII)}}|| N||?||N||
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Layton|20pj5|2006 BCPC 655 (CanLII)}}||N||?||?||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Layton|20pj5|2006 BCPC 655 (CanLII)}}||N||?||?||
|-
|-
|''R v Murphy'', <br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1n2l1 2006 CanLII 12417] (ON CA)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Murphy|1n2l1|2006 CanLII 12417 (ON CA)}}
|| N ||N ||N||confidential informer gave sufficient details to form grounds of arrest
|| N ||N ||N||confidential informer gave sufficient details to form grounds of arrest
|-
|-
Line 215: Line 215:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Campbell|55zz|2003 MBCA 76 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Campbell|55zz|2003 MBCA 76 (CanLII)}}||Y||-||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Myers'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/6m2q 2003 CanLII 36859] (ON SC)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Myers|6m2q|2003 CanLII 36859 (ON SC)}}
||Y||N||N||
||Y||N||N||
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ungaro|5b7w|2003 BCPC 137 (CanLII)}}||Y||?||Y||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Ungaro|5b7w|2003 BCPC 137 (CanLII)}}||Y||?||Y||
|-
|-
|''R v Philpott'',<br> [2002] O.J. No. 4872  
|{{CanLIIR-SN|Philpott| [2002] O.J. No. 4872}}
|| || || || search warrant
|| || || || search warrant
|-
|-
|''R v Jones'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1wc6g 2001 CanLII 28336] (ON SC)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Jones|1wc6g|2001 CanLII 28336 (ON SC)}}
|| Y||-||Y|| warrant to search apartment
|| Y||-||Y|| warrant to search apartment
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Warford|4vd7|2001 NFCA 64 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|{{CanLIIR-S|Warford|4vd7|2001 NFCA 64 (CanLII)}}||N||N||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Lewis'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/4q25 1998 CanLII 7116] (ON CA)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Lewis|4q25|1998 CanLII 7116 (ON CA)}}
||Y||-||N||
||Y||-||N||
|-
|-
|''R v Smellie'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1dcng 1994 CanLII 1612] (BC CA)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Smellie|1dcng|1994 CanLII 1612 (BC CA)}}
|| N||N||N|| multiple informers
|| N||N||N|| multiple informers
|-
|-
|''R v Zammit'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1p79b 1993 CanLII 3424] (ON CA)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Zammit|1p79b|1993 CanLII 3424 (ON CA)}}
|| Y || - || Y||  
|| Y || - || Y||  
|-
|-
|''R v Lamy'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1npk6 1993 CanLII 3368] (MB CA)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Lamy|1npk6|1993 CanLII 3368 (MB CA)}}
|| Y||-||Y||
|| Y||-||Y||
|-
|-
|''R v Charlton'',<br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1d9c1 1992 CanLII 367] (BC CA)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Charlton|1d9c1|1992 CanLII 367 (BC CA)}}
||N||N||N||
||N||N||N||
|-
|-
| ''R v Cheecham'',<br> (1989) 51 CCC (3d) 498  
| {{CanLIIR-S|Cheecham|(1989) 51 CCC (3d) 498}}
||Y||?||Y||
||Y||?||Y||
|-
|-
|''R v Pastro'',<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1pfnp 1988 CanLII 214] (SKCA)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Pastro|1pfnp|1988 CanLII 214 (SKCA)}}
||Y||?||Y||
||Y||?||Y||
|}
|}
Line 265: Line 265:
| {{CanLIIR-S|Chubak|2224h|2009 ABCA 8 (CanLII)}}||?||?||?||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Chubak|2224h|2009 ABCA 8 (CanLII)}}||?||?||?||
|-
|-
| ''R v Lamour'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1rbqt 2007 CanLII 15242] (ON S.C.)
| {{CanLIIR-S|Lamour|1rbqt|2007 CanLII 15242 (ON S.C.)}}
||Y||?||N|| arrested accused from impaired driving; did inventory search that included non-plain view items
||Y||?||N|| arrested accused from impaired driving; did inventory search that included non-plain view items
|-
|-
| ''R v Roberts'',<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/1t1qg 2007 CanLII 39895] (ON S.C.)
| {{CanLIIR-S|Roberts|1t1qg|2007 CanLII 39895 (ON S.C.)}}
||N||N||N|| search vehicle incident to arrest for firearm lawful
||N||N||N|| search vehicle incident to arrest for firearm lawful
|-
|-
|''R v Kitaitchik'', <Br>[http://canlii.ca/t/1cx77 2002 CanLII 45000] (ON C.A.)
|{{CanLIIR-S|Kitaitchik|1cx77|2002 CanLII 45000 (ON C.A.)}}
||Y||?||N|| warrantless seizure of clothing worn by accused in murder investigation  
||Y||?||N|| warrantless seizure of clothing worn by accused in murder investigation  
|}
|}
Line 280: Line 280:
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !! Summary
! Case Name !! s.8 !! s.9 !! s.24 !! Summary
|-
|-
|R v Latham and Ryan,<Br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fqt8b 2012 BCPC 78] (CanLII)|| Y|| -|| Y|| warrantless search of basement apartment
|{{CanLIIR-S|Latham and Ryan|fqt8b|2012 BCPC 78 (CanLII)}}|| Y|| -|| Y|| warrantless search of basement apartment
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Helary|fpql0|2012 SKPC 15 (CanLII)}}|| Y||?||Y||  
|{{CanLIIR-S|Helary|fpql0|2012 SKPC 15 (CanLII)}}|| Y||?||Y||  
Line 286: Line 286:
|{{CanLIIR-S|Laliberte|fpg3p|2011 SKPC 190 (CanLII)}}|| Y||-||N|| source info brings police to house; they are invited into vestibule; smell marijuana; enter into reminder of house after accused runs away. No consent to enter.
|{{CanLIIR-S|Laliberte|fpg3p|2011 SKPC 190 (CanLII)}}|| Y||-||N|| source info brings police to house; they are invited into vestibule; smell marijuana; enter into reminder of house after accused runs away. No consent to enter.
|-
|-
|''R v Got'',<Br> 2011 BCPC 328 {{NOCANLII}}||Y||?||?|| warrantless entry into residence found in violation of s.8
|{{CanLIIR-SN|Got|2011 BCPC 328}}||Y||?||?|| warrantless entry into residence found in violation of s.8
|-
|-
|{{CanLIIR-S|Stevens|fphjm|2011 ONCJ 794 (CanLII)}}|| Y ||-||Y|| police enter home without warrant and search house
|{{CanLIIR-S|Stevens|fphjm|2011 ONCJ 794 (CanLII)}}|| Y ||-||Y|| police enter home without warrant and search house
Line 303: Line 303:
| {{CanLIIR-S|Mann|fsdzc|2012 BCSC 1247 (CanLII)}}||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Mann|fsdzc|2012 BCSC 1247 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| R v Munro & Munro,<br> [http://canlii.ca/t/fphhc 2012 ONSC 43] (CanLII) || cell phone search indicent to arrest -- admitted  
| {{CanLIIR-S|Munro & Munro|fphhc|2012 ONSC 43 (CanLII)}} || cell phone search indicent to arrest -- admitted  
|-
|-
| {{CanLIIR-S|Groves|fm7j4|2011 ONCJ 350 (CanLII)}}||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Groves|fm7j4|2011 ONCJ 350 (CanLII)}}||
Line 317: Line 317:
| {{CanLIIR-S|Zahrebelny|2ftfr|2010 NSPC 91 (CanLII)}}||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Zahrebelny|2ftfr|2010 NSPC 91 (CanLII)}}||
|-
|-
| ''R v Finnikin'', <br>[http://canlii.ca/t/29jjs 2009 CanLII 82187] (ON SC)||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Finnikin|29jjs|2009 CanLII 82187 (ON SC)}}||
|}
|}


Revision as of 12:47, 6 March 2021

Retrieved from "https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php?title=Warrantless_Searches_(Cases)&oldid=64002"