Kienapple (Cases): Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "\|[\s]*\'\'R v ([^\']+)\'\',\<[Bb][Rr]\>[\s]*(\[[0-9]{4}\][\s]*[^,]+)\,[\s]*\[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9]+) ([0-9]{4} [a-zA-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(([^\)]*)\)\{\{" to "{{CanLIIRP-S|$1|$3|$4 ($5)|, $2}}{{" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{LevelZero}} | {{LevelZero}} | ||
{{HeaderProcCases}} | {{HeaderProcCases}} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
| {{CanLIIR-S|Ramage|2bkq5|2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid | | {{CanLIIR-S|Ramage|2bkq5|2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | {{CanLIIRPC-S|John v The Queen|1ftxp|1985 CanLII 15 (SCC)|, [1985] 2 SCR 476}}{{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{CanLIIRP-S|Davis|1fql7|1999 CanLII 638 (SCC)|, [1999] 3 SCR 759}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}|| | {{CanLIIRP-S|Davis|1fql7|1999 CanLII 638 (SCC)|, [1999] 3 SCR 759}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{CanLIIRP-S|Prince|1ftr3|1986 CanLII 40 (SCC)|, [1986] 2 SCR 480}}{{perSCC|Dickson CJ}}|| | |{{CanLIIRP-S|Prince|1ftr3|1986 CanLII 40 (SCC)|, [1986] 2 SCR 480}}{{perSCC|Dickson CJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{CanLIIRP-S|Pringle|1ft4b|1989 CanLII 65 (SCC)|, [1989] 1 SCR 1645}}{{perSCC|Lamer J}}|| | |{{CanLIIRP-S|Pringle|1ft4b|1989 CanLII 65 (SCC)|, [1989] 1 SCR 1645}}{{perSCC|Lamer J}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{CanLIIRP-S|Wigman|1ftnb|1985 CanLII 1 (SCC)|, [1987] 1 SCR 246}}{{TheCourtSCC}}|| | |{{CanLIIRP-S|Wigman|1ftnb|1985 CanLII 1 (SCC)|, [1987] 1 SCR 246}}{{TheCourtSCC}}|| | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 20:45, 7 March 2021
Kienapple
1999 CanLII 638 (SCC), , [1999] 3 SCR 759, perLamer CJ||
| Case Name | Summary |
|---|---|
| R v Hope, 2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII), per Stack J | sexual assault and sexual interference |
| R v Ramage, 2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII), per Doherty JA | Impaired & Dangerous driving valid |
| John v The Queen, 1985 CanLII 15 (SCC), , [1985] 2 SCR 476, per Estey and Lamer JJ |
|
| R v Prince, 1986 CanLII 40 (SCC), , [1986] 2 SCR 480, per Dickson CJ |
|
| R v Pringle, 1989 CanLII 65 (SCC), , [1989] 1 SCR 1645, per Lamer J |
|
| R v Wigman, 1985 CanLII 1 (SCC), , [1987] 1 SCR 246, per curiam |