Kienapple (Cases): Difference between revisions

From Criminal Law Notebook
m Text replacement - "\|[\s]*\'\'R v ([^\']+)\'\',\<[Bb][Rr]\>[\s]*(\[[0-9]{4}\][\s]*[^,]+)\,[\s]*\[http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/([a-zA-Z0-9]+) ([0-9]{4} [a-zA-Z]+ [0-9]+)\] \(([^\)]*)\)\{\{" to "{{CanLIIRP-S|$1|$3|$4 ($5)|, $2}}{{"
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--****-->
{{LevelZero}}
{{LevelZero}}
{{HeaderProcCases}}
{{HeaderProcCases}}
Line 13: Line 12:
| {{CanLIIR-S|Ramage|2bkq5|2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
| {{CanLIIR-S|Ramage|2bkq5|2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII)}}{{perONCA|Doherty JA}} || Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
|-
|-
|''John v The Queen'',<br> [1985] 2 SCR 476, [http://canlii.ca/t/1ftxp 1985 CanLII 15] (SCC){{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}||  
| {{CanLIIRPC-S|John v The Queen|1ftxp|1985 CanLII 15 (SCC)|, [1985] 2 SCR 476}}{{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}||  
|-
|-
{{CanLIIRP-S|Davis|1fql7|1999 CanLII 638 (SCC)|, [1999] 3 SCR 759}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}||
{{CanLIIRP-S|Davis|1fql7|1999 CanLII 638 (SCC)|, [1999] 3 SCR 759}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}||
|-
|-
{{CanLIIRP-S|Prince|1ftr3|1986 CanLII 40 (SCC)|, [1986] 2 SCR 480}}{{perSCC|Dickson CJ}}||
|{{CanLIIRP-S|Prince|1ftr3|1986 CanLII 40 (SCC)|, [1986] 2 SCR 480}}{{perSCC|Dickson CJ}}||
|-
|-
{{CanLIIRP-S|Pringle|1ft4b|1989 CanLII 65 (SCC)|, [1989] 1 SCR 1645}}{{perSCC|Lamer J}}||
|{{CanLIIRP-S|Pringle|1ft4b|1989 CanLII 65 (SCC)|, [1989] 1 SCR 1645}}{{perSCC|Lamer J}}||
|-
|-
{{CanLIIRP-S|Wigman|1ftnb|1985 CanLII 1 (SCC)|, [1987] 1 SCR 246}}{{TheCourtSCC}}||
|{{CanLIIRP-S|Wigman|1ftnb|1985 CanLII 1 (SCC)|, [1987] 1 SCR 246}}{{TheCourtSCC}}||
|}
|}

Revision as of 21:45, 7 March 2021

Kienapple

See also: Kienapple Principle
R v Davis,
1999 CanLII 638 (SCC), , [1999] 3 SCR 759, perLamer CJ||
Case Name Summary
R v Hope, 2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII), per Stack J sexual assault and sexual interference
R v Ramage, 2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII), per Doherty JA Impaired & Dangerous driving valid
John v The Queen,
1985 CanLII 15 (SCC), , [1985] 2 SCR 476, per Estey and Lamer JJ
R v Prince,
1986 CanLII 40 (SCC), , [1986] 2 SCR 480, per Dickson CJ
R v Pringle,
1989 CanLII 65 (SCC), , [1989] 1 SCR 1645, per Lamer J
R v Wigman,
1985 CanLII 1 (SCC), , [1987] 1 SCR 246, per curiam