Kienapple (Cases): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| {{CanLIIRPC-S|John v The Queen|1ftxp|1985 CanLII 15 (SCC)|, [1985] 2 SCR 476}}{{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}|| | | {{CanLIIRPC-S|John v The Queen|1ftxp|1985 CanLII 15 (SCC)|, [1985] 2 SCR 476}}{{perSCC|Estey and Lamer JJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
{{CanLIIRP-S|Davis|1fql7|1999 CanLII 638 (SCC)|, [1999] 3 SCR 759}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}|| | |{{CanLIIRP-S|Davis|1fql7|1999 CanLII 638 (SCC)|, [1999] 3 SCR 759}}{{perSCC|Lamer CJ}}|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{CanLIIRP-S|Prince|1ftr3|1986 CanLII 40 (SCC)|, [1986] 2 SCR 480}}{{perSCC|Dickson CJ}}|| | |{{CanLIIRP-S|Prince|1ftr3|1986 CanLII 40 (SCC)|, [1986] 2 SCR 480}}{{perSCC|Dickson CJ}}|| | ||
Revision as of 21:45, 7 March 2021
Kienapple
| Case Name | Summary |
|---|---|
| R v Hope, 2011 NLTD 143 (CanLII), per Stack J | sexual assault and sexual interference |
| R v Ramage, 2010 ONCA 488 (CanLII), per Doherty JA | Impaired & Dangerous driving valid |
| John v The Queen, 1985 CanLII 15 (SCC), , [1985] 2 SCR 476, per Estey and Lamer JJ |
|
| R v Davis, 1999 CanLII 638 (SCC), , [1999] 3 SCR 759, per Lamer CJ |
|
| R v Prince, 1986 CanLII 40 (SCC), , [1986] 2 SCR 480, per Dickson CJ |
|
| R v Pringle, 1989 CanLII 65 (SCC), , [1989] 1 SCR 1645, per Lamer J |
|
| R v Wigman, 1985 CanLII 1 (SCC), , [1987] 1 SCR 246, per curiam |