Circumstantial Evidence (Case Digests): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "(ON CA)" to "(ONCA)" |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* {{CanLIIR|Grant|1pzxw|2006 ABPC 306 (CanLII)}}{{fix}} | * {{CanLIIR|Grant|1pzxw|2006 ABPC 306 (CanLII)}}{{fix}} | ||
* {{CanLIIR|SWM|1m1b0|2005 BCSC 1601 (CanLII)}}{{fix}} -- conviction -- father was last person with child before discovery of injuries, coupled with evidence of past bad acts | * {{CanLIIR|SWM|1m1b0|2005 BCSC 1601 (CanLII)}}{{fix}} -- conviction -- father was last person with child before discovery of injuries, coupled with evidence of past bad acts | ||
* {{CanLIIRP|Tsigaridas|6k70|1994 CanLII 1289 ( | * {{CanLIIRP|Tsigaridas|6k70|1994 CanLII 1289 (ONCA)|, [1994] O.J. No 1999 (Ont C.A.)}}{{fix}} -- acquittal -- evidence showing that keys to restaurant were shared with employees negates exclusive opportunity of owner to burn down business | ||
* {{CanLIIR-N|Keller|(1970) 1 CCC (2d) 203}} -- convicted -- fingerprint on matchbook found at scene sufficient to connect accused with break and enter. | * {{CanLIIR-N|Keller|(1970) 1 CCC (2d) 203}} -- convicted -- fingerprint on matchbook found at scene sufficient to connect accused with break and enter. | ||
--> | --> | ||