Section 276 Applications (Cases): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "(ON SC)" to "(ONSC)" |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{TCase| {{CanLIIR-S|Nepinak|2dt95|2010 BCSC 1677 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Romilly J}} | not admitted | }} | {{TCase| {{CanLIIR-S|Nepinak|2dt95|2010 BCSC 1677 (CanLII)}}{{perBCSC|Romilly J}} | not admitted | }} | ||
{{TCase| {{CanLIIR-S|Salehi|227jz|2009 CanLII 2034 ( | {{TCase| {{CanLIIR-S|Salehi|227jz|2009 CanLII 2034 (ONSC)}}{{perONSC|Himel J}} | not admitted| }} | ||
{{TCase| {{CanLIIR-S|JT|2cqcd|2010 ONSC 5246 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC| Ricchetti J}} | admitted| }} | {{TCase| {{CanLIIR-S|JT|2cqcd|2010 ONSC 5246 (CanLII)}}{{perONSC| Ricchetti J}} | admitted| }} | ||
Revision as of 15:35, 21 March 2021
Extrinsic Sexual Activity of the Complainant
| Case Name | Result | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R v Boone, 2016 ONCA 227 (CanLII), per Sharpe JA | some admitted | The accused is alleged to have had unprotected sex while HIV positive without notifying partner. Judge permitted to use a prior inconsistent statement of complainant relating to past sexual practice. |
| R v Butts, 2012 ONCA 24 (CanLII), per curiam | admitted | exclusion of sexual conduct under 276 results in new trial |
| R v Sanghar, 2012 ABPC 34 (CanLII), per Ogle J | admitted | evidence of prior intercourse between inmates admitted in s. 272 charge |
| R v Gill, 2011 ONCJ 345(*no CanLII links) | ||
| R v Quesnelle, 2010 ONSC 2698 (CanLII), per Thorburn J | admitted | evidence that the accused paid for sex with victim twice in the months before allegation. |
| R v R.R.W. (No. 1), , 2010 NLTD 136(*no CanLII links) | admitted | |
| R v Nepinak, 2010 BCSC 1677 (CanLII), per Romilly J | not admitted | |
| R v Salehi, 2009 CanLII 2034 (ONSC), per Himel J | not admitted | |
| R v JT, 2010 ONSC 5246 (CanLII), per Ricchetti J | admitted | |
| R v Harris, 1997 CanLII 6317 (ON CA), per Moldaver JA |